An investigation of the relationship between accuracy of customer baseline calculation and efficiency of Peak Time Rebate program

In this paper, the relationship between accuracy of Customer Baseline (CBL) calculation and efficiency of Peak Time Rebate (PTR) program for residential customers is investigated. To perform the analysis, well-established CBL calculation methods, HighXofY(NYISO), LowXofY, MidXofY, exponential moving average(ISONE) and regression are first introduced and then utilized to calculate the CBL. A dataset consisting of 262 residential customers is used for this analysis. In addition, the error analysis is performed using accuracy and bias metrics. Furthermore, to reach a valid conclusion about overall performance of CBL methods, an economic analysis of a PTR program is carried out. According to the results, in the case study, utility pays at least half of its revenue as a rebate merely due to the inaccuracy of CBL methods. In addition, it is shown that PTR causes a lot of inefficiencies in the residential sector because of the failure of CBL calculation methods to predict the customers load profile on event day.

[1]  H. Chao Demand response in wholesale electricity markets: the choice of customer baseline , 2011 .

[2]  Karl Aberer,et al.  When Bias Matters: An Economic Assessment of Demand Response Baselines for Residential Customers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Sung-Kwan Joo,et al.  Customer baseline load (CBL) calculation using exponential smoothing model with weather adjustment , 2009, 2009 Transmission & Distribution Conference & Exposition: Asia and Pacific.

[4]  Hongseok Kim,et al.  Data-Driven Baseline Estimation of Residential Buildings for Demand Response , 2015 .

[5]  Sanem Sergici,et al.  Piloting the Smart Grid , 2009 .

[6]  N Yamaguchi,et al.  Regression models for demand reduction based on cluster analysis of load profiles , 2009, 2009 IEEE PES/IAS Conference on Sustainable Alternative Energy (SAE).

[7]  Clifford Grimm Evaluating Baselines for Demand Response Programs , 2008 .

[8]  The Demand Response Baseline , 2009 .

[9]  Farrokh Rahimi,et al.  Demand Response as a Market Resource Under the Smart Grid Paradigm , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[10]  Sila Kiliccote,et al.  Statistical analysis of baseline load models for non-residential buildings , 2009 .

[11]  Hung-po Chao,et al.  Demand Management in Restructured Wholesale Electricity Markets , 2010 .

[12]  Sila Kiliccote,et al.  Estimating Demand Response Load Impacts: Evaluation of BaselineLoad Models for Non-Residential Buildings in California , 2008 .

[13]  Jun-Ho Choi,et al.  Case study of customer baseline(CBL) load determination in Korea based on statistical method , 2009, 2009 Transmission & Distribution Conference & Exposition: Asia and Pacific.

[14]  Amy Buege,et al.  Prepare for Impact: Measuring Large C&I Customer Response to DR Programs , 2006 .

[15]  Johanna L. Mathieu,et al.  Understanding the Effect of Baseline Modeling Implementation Choices on Analysis of Demand Response Performance , 2012 .

[16]  Johanna L. Mathieu,et al.  How Baseline Model Implementation Choices Affect Demand Response Assessments , 2015 .

[17]  Hongseok Kim,et al.  A framework for baseline load estimation in demand response: Data mining approach , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[18]  Payam Teimourzadeh Baboli,et al.  Including the behavioral aspects of customers in demand response model: Real time pricing versus peak time rebate , 2015, 2015 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).