Unemployment and Effort at Work

We measure the sensitivity of work effort to local labour market conditions using self‐reported non‐work at the workplace in the American Time Use Survey (ATUS) 2003–12. Non‐work at work is quantitatively significant and varies positively with local unemployment, but in opposite directions at the extensive and intensive margins. The fraction of workers reporting positive values declines with unemployment, while time spent in non‐work conditional on any such time rises with unemployment. The results speak to issues of labour hoarding, efficiency wages and the cyclicality of labour productivity. We also demonstrate a relationship between the incidence of non‐work and unemployment benefits in state data linked to the ATUS. There are also pronounced occupational differences in the incidence and intensity of non‐work.

[1]  M. Kalecki.  Political Aspects of Full Employment , 2021, The Political Economy.

[2]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  The Downside of Downtime: The Prevalence and Work Pacing Consequences of Idle Time at Work , 2018, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  John H. Pencavel,et al.  The Productivity of Working Hours , 2015, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Yiannis Gabriel.  Empty Labor: Idleness and Workplace Resistance , 2015 .

[5]  J. Biddle.  Retrospectives: The Cyclical Behavior of Labor Productivity and the Emergence of the Labor Hoarding Concept , 2014 .

[6]  Mark Aguiar,et al.  Time Use during the Great Recession , 2013 .

[7]  Jay Stewart,et al.  Cyclical Variation in Labor Hours and Productivity Using the ATUS , 2012, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[8]  Matthew J. Notowidigdo,et al.  Should Unemployment Insurance Vary with the Unemployment Rate? Theory and Evidence , 2011 .

[9]  S. Ongena,et al.  Hazardous Times for Monetary Policy: What Do Twenty-Three Million Bank Loans Say about the Effects of Monetary Policy on Credit Risk-Taking? , 2007 .

[10]  Katharine G. Abraham,et al.  Non-Response in the American Time Use Survey: Who is Missing from the Data and How Much Does it Matter? , 2006 .

[11]  Jay Stewart,et al.  Data Watch: The American Time Use Survey , 2005 .

[12]  Harley Frazis,et al.  What Can Time-Use Data Tell Us about Hours of Work? Estimates of Hours Worked from the CPS Are Very Close to Estimates from the ATUS for CPS Reference Weeks; However, CPS Reference Weeks Are Not Representative of the Entire Month , 2004 .

[13]  Daniel S. Hamermesh.  Labor Demand , 1993 .

[14]  Peter Cappelli,et al.  An Interplant Test of the Efficiency Wage Hypothesis , 1991 .

[15]  F. Stafford,et al.  The Allocation of Time: Empirical Findings, Behavioral Models, and Problems of Measurement , 1991 .

[16]  D. Hamermesh.  Shirking or Productive Schmoozing: Wages and the Allocation of Time at Work , 1988 .

[17]  George A. Akerlof.  Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange , 1982 .

[18]  J. Heckman.  The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models , 1976 .

[19]  J. G. Cragg.  Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods , 1971 .

[20]  M. Kalecki.  POLITICAL ASPECTS OF FULL EMPLOYMENT1 , 1943 .

[21]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  The Production Process in a Competitive Economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian Models , 1985 .

[22]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device , 1984 .

[23]  G. Calvo.  Quasi-Walrasian Theories of Unemployment , 1979 .

[24]  Stanley Bernard Mathewson.  Restriction of output among unorganized workers , 1931 .