Quantitative analysis of a reconstruction method for fully three-dimensional PET.

The major advantage of positron emission tomography (PET) using large area planar detectors over scintillator-based commercial ring systems is the potentially larger (by a factor of two or three) axial field-of-view (FOV). However, to achieve the space invariance of the point spread function necessary for Fourier filtering a polar angle rejection criterion is applied to the data during backprojection resulting in a trade-off between FOV size and sensitivity. A new algorithm due to Defrise and co-workers developed for list-mode data overcomes this problem with a solution involving the division of the image into several subregions. A comparison between the existing backprojection-then-filter algorithm and the new method (with three subregions) has been made using both simulated and real data collected from the MUP-PET positron camera. Signal-to-noise analysis reveals that improvements of up to a factor of 1.4 are possible resulting from an increased data usage of up to a factor of 2.5 depending on the axial extent of the imaged object. Quantitation is also improved.

[1]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  The Theory of Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction for PET , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  M. Defrise,et al.  Three dimensional reconstruction of PET data from a multi-ring camera , 1989 .

[3]  Michel Defrise,et al.  A new three-dimensional reconstruction method for positron cameras using plane detectors , 1988 .

[4]  K. Tam,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging in the position camera using Fourier techniques. , 1977, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  J. Colsher,et al.  Fully-three-dimensional positron emission tomography , 1980, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J. Suckling,et al.  DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR A HIGH-RATE POSITRON CAMERA BASED ON A BAF2/TMAE SYSTEM , 1989 .

[7]  C. Parkman,et al.  The High-Density Avalanche Chamber for Positron Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[8]  B. Schorr,et al.  Image Reconstruction for a Rotating Positron Tomograph , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  John A. McIntyre Computer Assisted Tomography without a Computer , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[10]  Martin J. Berger,et al.  Evaluation of the collision stopping power of elements and compounds for electrons and positrons , 1982 .

[11]  S. Webb,et al.  The performance of a multiwire proportional chamber positron camera for clinical use. , 1989, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  D. Townsend,et al.  Increased sensitivity and field of view for a rotating positron camera. , 1984, Physics in Medicine and Biology.

[13]  M. Defrise,et al.  An algorithm for three-dimensional reconstruction incorporating cross-plane rays. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[14]  B Schorr,et al.  A general method for three-dimensional filter computation. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  D. Townsend PET with the HIDAC camera , 1988 .

[16]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  Analytical study of the effect of collimation on the performance of PET cameras in 3-D imaging , 1990 .

[17]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[18]  S R Cherry,et al.  3D PET using a conventional multislice tomograph without septa. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  D. C. Howse,et al.  Description and performance of a prototype PET system for small volume imaging , 1988 .

[20]  Jong Beom Ra,et al.  A true three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm for the spherical positron emission tomograph , 1982 .

[21]  Z. H. Cho,et al.  True Three-Dimensional Reconstruction (TTR) Application of Algorithm toward Full Utilization of Oblique Rays , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Christopher J. Thompson The effect of collimation on single rates in multi-slice PET , 1989 .

[23]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Fully three-dimensional reconstruction for a PET camera with retractable septa , 1991 .