Examining the Effectiveness of Boot Camps: A Randomized Experiment with a Long-Term Follow Up

The boot camp model became a correctional panacea for juvenile offenders during the early 1990s, promising the best of both worlds—less recidivism and lower operating costs. Although there have been numerous studies of boot camp programs since that time, most have relied on nonrandomized comparison groups. The California Youth Authority’s (CYA’s) experimental study of its juvenile boot camp and intensive parole program (called LEAD)—versus standard custody and parole—was an important exception, but its legislatively mandated in-house evaluation was prepared before complete outcome data were available. The present study capitalizes on full and relatively long-term follow-up arrest data for the LEAD evaluation provided by the California Department of Justice in August 2002. Using both survival models and negative binomial regression models, the results indicate that there were no significant differences between groups in terms of time to first arrest or average arrest frequency.

[1]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Desisting from Crime: Continuity and Change in Long-Term Crime Patterns of Serious Chronic Offenders , 2005 .

[2]  Megan C. Kurlychek,et al.  An Outcome Evaluation of Pennsylvania's Boot Camp: Does Rehabilitative Programming within a Disciplinary Setting Reduce Recidivism? , 2003 .

[3]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  5. Modeling Multiple Failure Time Data: A Survey of Variance-Corrected Proportional Hazards Models with Empirical Applications to Arrest Data , 2003 .

[4]  A. Petrosino,et al.  The “Experimenting Agency” , 2003, Evaluation review.

[5]  R. B. Lake,et al.  Second Chances , 2002 .

[6]  David B. Wilson,et al.  Effects of Correctional Boot Camps on Offending , 2001 .

[7]  R. Martínez.  Crossing Over: A Mexican Family on the Migrant Trail , 2001 .

[8]  Doris Layton MacKenzie,et al.  Evidence-Based Corrections: Identifying What Works , 2000 .

[9]  Faith E. Lutze,et al.  Mental Abuse as Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Do Boot Camp Prisons Violate the Eighth Amendment? , 1999 .

[10]  Faith E. Lutze.  Are shock incarceration programs more rehabilitative than traditional prisons? A survey of inmates , 1998 .

[11]  J. A. Calvin.  Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[12]  M. Saar,et al.  Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention , 1998 .

[13]  Gregory E. Winkler.  Family Connections: A Treatment Foster Care Model for Adolescents with Delinquency , 1996 .

[14]  K. Land,et al.  A Comparison of Poisson, Negative Binomial, and Semiparametric Mixed Poisson Regression Models , 1996 .

[15]  Daniel B. Felker,et al.  Boot Camps for Juvenile Offenders: An Implementation Evaluation of Three Demonstration Programs: (497702006-001) , 1996 .

[16]  D. Mackenzie,et al.  Inmates' attitude change during incarceration: A comparison of boot camp with traditional prison , 1995 .

[17]  P. Allison.  Survival analysis using the SAS system : a practical guide , 1995 .

[18]  Thomas C. Castellano,et al.  "Boot Camp" Drug Treatment and Aftercare Interventions: An Evaluation Review , 1995 .

[19]  A. Piquero,et al.  The Impact of Shock Incarceration Programs on Prison Crowding , 1994 .

[20]  M. Geerken,et al.  Rap sheets in criminological research: Considerations and caveats , 1994 .

[21]  Robert D. Hoge,et al.  DOES CORRECTIONAL TREATMENT WORK? A CLINICALLY RELEVANT AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INFORMED META-ANALYSIS * , 1990 .

[22]  Merry Morash,et al.  A Critical Look at the Idea of Boot Camp as a Correctional Reform , 1990 .

[23]  Gary King,et al.  Statistical Models for Political Science Event Counts: Bias in Conventional Procedures and Evidence for the Exponential Poisson Regression Model , 1988 .

[24]  M. W. Pumphrey.  : The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic , 1973 .

[25]  K. Erikson,et al.  The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic , 1972 .

[26]  Katherine Bement Davis.  Probation and Parole , 1916 .