GPR multi-component data analysis

In order to test the capabilities of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) detection, models were reproduced in a laboratory using both plastic and metal cylinders as well as sheets to represent anomalies buried in a plastic tank containing sand. These models, which represent pipes and dipping layers in a homogeneous medium (i.e., sand), were used to detect the object’s position and study its polarization properties based on the different dielectric contrasts between the object and the surrounding medium. We paid particular attention to the choice of medium through which the wavefield propagated, to be sure of its isotropy and homogeneity, in order for the velocity to be the same for every path travelled. Experimental tests were carried out by changing the dielectric contrasts from the target to the surrounding medium. In particular, the dielectric cylinders (which have a lower permittivity than that of the surrounding sand) were filled with different substances to represent targets such as PVC pipes, either empty or filled with hydrocarbons or water. The resulting scattered field depended on the electrical properties of both the cylinder and the surrounding material, the distance from the cylinder and the scattering angle. Further experimental tests were carried out by using multi-component GPR data to study the possibility of calculating the angle between the direction of the profile and that of the anomalies. The experimental data obtained as responses to the physical models proved that this method can be successfully applied to detect the orientation of dipping layers, cylinders and vertical fractures.

[1]  G. T. Ruck,et al.  Radar Cross Section Handbook Vol. 1 , 1970 .

[2]  Rf electrical properties of bituminous coal samples , 1970 .

[3]  R. D. Watts,et al.  THE ELECTROMAGNETIC RESPONSE OF A LOW‐LOSS, 2‐LAYER, DIELECTRIC EARTH FOR HORIZONTAL ELECTRIC DIPOLE EXCITATION , 1975 .

[4]  Julian B. Coon,et al.  Experimental uses of short pulse radar in coal seams , 1981 .

[5]  Charles Elachi,et al.  Radiation patterns of interfacial dipole antennas , 1982 .

[6]  R. M. Alford,et al.  Shear data in the presence of azimuthal anisotropy: Dilley, Texas , 1986 .

[7]  David J. Daniels,et al.  Introduction to subsurface radar , 1988 .

[8]  C. Balanis Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , 1989 .

[9]  S. Tillard Radar experiments in isotropic and anisotropic geological formations (granite and schists)1 , 1994 .

[10]  Motoyuki Sato,et al.  Subsurface fracture measurement with polarimetric borehole radar , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Multi-configuration Ground Penetrating Radar Data , 1999 .

[12]  Erich D. Guy,et al.  SIGNIFICANCE OF CROSSED-DIPOLE ANTENNAS FOR HIGH NOISE ENVIRONMENTS , 2000 .

[13]  Paul L. Stoffa,et al.  Migration using multiconfiguration GPR data , 2000, International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[14]  J. Daniels,et al.  Ground penetrating radar polarization and scattering from cylinders , 2000 .

[15]  Paul L. Stoffa,et al.  Application of Alford rotation to ground-penetrating radar data , 2001 .

[16]  Stanley J. Radzevicius Dipole antenna properties and their effects on ground penetrating radar data , 2001 .

[17]  Yoonho Song,et al.  Finding the strike direction of fractures using GPR , 2001 .

[18]  Polarization and acquisition in GPR surveys: tests on physical models , 2003 .