Attribute Elicitation in Marketing Research: A Comparison of Three Procedures

This article compares three attribute elicitation procedures commonlyapplied in marketing research—free elicitation (FE), hierarchicaldichotomization (HD), and Kelly's repertory grid—on type ofinformation generated, convergent validity, efficiency in datacollection, and consumers' reaction to the elicitation task. On mostcriteria, RG and HD were not significantly different. The maincontrasts were found between FE on the one hand and RG and HD on theother hand. FE yielded more attributes, a higher proportion of abstractattributes, and a higher level of articulation and was more timeefficient. FE was also evaluated more positively by respondents thanthe other two techniques. Despite these differences, the threeprocedures exhibited a considerable degree of convergent validity interms of the basic categories of concepts uncovered in the elicitationprocedure. Unless the marketing research technique for which theattributes are elicited requires attributes at a low level ofabstraction, the results suggest that FE is to be preferred to HD andRG.

[1]  D. Bannister,et al.  Personal construct theory: A summary and experimental paradigm , 1962 .

[2]  A. Greenwald Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? , 1976 .

[3]  J. Berge,et al.  Perceptual Mapping Based on Idiosyncratic Sets of Attributes , 1994 .

[4]  George S. Day,et al.  The Threats to Marketing Research , 1975 .

[5]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  The Stability of Responses Obtained By Free Elicitation: Implications For Measuring Attribute Salience and Memory Structure , 1979 .

[6]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[7]  Charles S. Madden,et al.  The Threats to Marketing Research: An Empirical Reappraisal , 1985 .

[8]  D. Gensch Empirically Testing a Disaggregate Choice Model for Segments , 1985 .

[9]  W. Mischel,et al.  Prototypes in Person Perception1 , 1979 .

[10]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Characteristic, Beneficial, and Image Attributes in Consumer Judgments of Similarity and Preference , 1993 .

[11]  Michael D. Johnson Comparability and Hierarchical Processing in Multialternative Choice , 1988 .

[12]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Managing Brand Equity , 1991 .

[13]  Allan D. Shocker,et al.  Multiattribute Approaches for Product Concept Evaluation and Generation: A Critical Review , 1979 .

[14]  Richard L. Celsi,et al.  Exploring the Structural Characteristics of Consumers' Knowledge , 1987 .

[15]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  The User's Guide to Multidimensional Scaling , 1985 .

[16]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Toward Conceptualizing and Measuring Cognitive Structures , 1981 .

[17]  G. Kelly The Psychology of Personal Constructs , 2020 .

[18]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[19]  Claes Fornell,et al.  The Nature and Methodological Implications of the Cognitive Representation of Products , 1987 .