The Appropriateness of the Poolability Assumption for Multiproduct Technologies: Evidence from the English Water and Sewerage Utilities

The empirical literature on the cost structure of multiproduct firms (e.g., public utilities providing in combination gas, water, and electricity) traditionally assumes a common technology across different products and stages of production, letting the issue of poolability unexplored. The appropriateness of this assumption is tested here by estimating a general cost function for samples of UK specialized and sewerage-diversified water utilities. The results show the existence of both aggregate scale economies and diseconomies of scope; more interestingly, the hypothesis that the two groups of water companies share the same technological parameters is rejected. Given the implications of this finding in terms of optimal industry configuration and possible restructuring policies (e.g., mergers and/or divestitures), our test suggests caution in pooling samples when undertaking empirical studies on data which refer to multiproduct technologies.

[1]  John W. Mayo,et al.  The Measurement of Vertical Economies and the Efficient Structure of the Electric Utility Industry , 1991 .

[2]  Juan A. Vega-Cervera,et al.  The use of parametric and non-parametric frontier methods to measure the productive efficiency in the industrial sector: A comparative study , 2001 .

[3]  David Saal Investigation into evidence for economies of scale in the water and sewerage industry in England and Wales: final report , 2004 .

[4]  David S. Saal,et al.  Determining the contribution of technical change, efficiency change and scale change to productivity growth in the privatized English and Welsh water and sewerage industry: 1985–2000 , 2007 .

[5]  E. Tsionas,et al.  A note on joint estimation of scale economies and productivity growth parameters , 2001 .

[6]  Quinn Weninger,et al.  Estimating multiproduct costs when some outputs are not produced , 2003 .

[7]  A. Zellner An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[8]  M. Ivaldi,et al.  Density and Integration Effects on Class I U.S. Freight Railroads , 2001 .

[9]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Efficiency measurement and regulation in US telecommunications: A robustness analysis , 2008 .

[10]  Richard T. Shin,et al.  Unnatural monopolies in local telephone , 1992 .

[11]  George Kapetanios,et al.  Cluster analysis of panel data sets using non-standard optimisation of information criteria , 2006 .

[12]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Scale economies, technology and technical change in the water industry: Evidence from the English water only sector , 2009 .

[13]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Economies of Scale and Scope in Multi-Utilities , 2008 .

[14]  D. Vannoni,et al.  Cost Savings From Generation and Distribution with an Application to Italian Electric Utilities* , 2004 .

[15]  W. Greene,et al.  Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  M. Farsi,et al.  Economies of scale and scope in the Swiss Multi-utilities Sector , 2008 .

[17]  Thanasis N. Christodoulopoulos Telecommunications in Greece: A study of production structure and natural monopoly issue , 1995 .

[18]  Davide Vannoni,et al.  Choosing among alternative cost function specifications: an application to Italian multi-utilities , 2004 .

[19]  Giovanni Fraquelli,et al.  Scope and scale economies in multi-utilities: evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations , 2004 .

[20]  Vertical and Horizontal Economies in the Electric Utility Industry : An Integrated Approach , 2005 .

[21]  M. Farsi,et al.  An analysis of cost efficiency in Swiss multi-utilities , 2008 .

[22]  Lester C. Hunt,et al.  Privatisation and Efficiency in the UK Water Industry: An Empirical Analysis , 2009 .

[23]  Maurizio Conti,et al.  Price cap regulation and the ratchet effect: a generalized index approach , 2009 .

[24]  Y. Braunstein,et al.  A Composite Cost Function for Multiproduct Firms with an Application to Economies of Scope in Banking , 1992 .