Auditory Sensory Substitution is Intuitive and Automatic with Texture Stimuli

Millions of people are blind worldwide. Sensory substitution (SS) devices (e.g., vOICe) can assist the blind by encoding a video stream into a sound pattern, recruiting visual brain areas for auditory analysis via crossmodal interactions and plasticity. SS devices often require extensive training to attain limited functionality. In contrast to conventional attention-intensive SS training that starts with visual primitives (e.g., geometrical shapes), we argue that sensory substitution can be engaged efficiently by using stimuli (such as textures) associated with intrinsic crossmodal mappings. Crossmodal mappings link images with sounds and tactile patterns. We show that intuitive SS sounds can be matched to the correct images by naive sighted participants just as well as by intensively-trained participants. This result indicates that existing crossmodal interactions and amodal sensory cortical processing may be as important in the interpretation of patterns by SS as crossmodal plasticity (e.g., the strengthening of existing connections or the formation of new ones), especially at the earlier stages of SS usage. An SS training procedure based on crossmodal mappings could both considerably improve participant performance and shorten training times, thereby enabling SS devices to significantly expand blind capabilities.

[1]  Charles Spence,et al.  Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Shachar Maidenbaum,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Sensory Substitution: Closing the Gap between Basic Research and Widespread Practical Visual Rehabilitation Author's Personal Copy , 2022 .

[3]  BENJAMIN WHITE,et al.  Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection , 1969, Nature.

[4]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Learning to Perceive with a Visuo — Auditory Substitution System: Localisation and Object Recognition with ‘The Voice’ , 2007, Perception.

[5]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Perceptual load influences auditory space perception in the ventriloquist aftereffect , 2011, Cognition.

[6]  Ron Kupers,et al.  Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals , 2011, Neuroreport.

[7]  M. Ptito,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  Marc O Ernst,et al.  Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  Amir Amedi,et al.  Reading with Sounds: Sensory Substitution Selectively Activates the Visual Word Form Area in the Blind , 2012, Neuron.

[10]  R. Campbell,et al.  Audiovisual Integration of Speech Falters under High Attention Demands , 2005, Current Biology.

[11]  P. Stoerig,et al.  Seeing ‘Where’ through the Ears: Effects of Learning-by-Doing and Long-Term Sensory Deprivation on Localization Based on Image-to-Sound Substitution , 2008, PloS one.

[12]  Ophelia Deroy,et al.  How automatic are crossmodal correspondences? , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[13]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  The metamodal organization of the brain. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[14]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  Functional recruitment of visual cortex for sound encoded object identification in the blind , 2009, Neuroreport.

[15]  L. Marks,et al.  Cross-modality matching of brightness and loudness. , 1965, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Jamie Ward,et al.  Seeing with Sound? Exploring Different Characteristics of a Visual-to-Auditory Sensory Substitution Device , 2011, Perception.

[17]  C. Spence Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[18]  C. C. Pratt The spatial character of high and low tones. , 1930 .

[19]  Anne Treisman,et al.  Preattentive processing in vision , 1985, Computer Vision Graphics and Image Processing.

[20]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Interactive Coding of Visual Spatial Frequency and Auditory Amplitude-Modulation Rate , 2012, Current Biology.

[22]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language , 2001 .

[23]  C. Veraart,et al.  Functional Cerebral Reorganization for Auditory Spatial Processing and Auditory Substitution of Vision in Early Blind Subjects , 2006 .

[24]  Jung-Kyong Kim,et al.  Generalized Learning of Visual-to-auditory Substitution in Sighted Individuals , 2008 .

[25]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  Christian Scheiber,et al.  What neuroimaging tells us about sensory substitution , 2007, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[27]  William M. Stern,et al.  Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.