A model of a robot's will based on higher-order desires

Autonomous robots implement decision making capacities on several layers of abstraction. Put in terms of desires, decision making evaluates desires to eventually commit to some most rational one. Drawing on the philosophical literature on volition and agency, this work introduces a conceptual model that enables robots to reason about which desires they want to want to realize, i.e., higher-order desires. As a result, six jointly exhaustive and pairwise disjoint types of choices are defined. Technical evaluation shows how to add a robot's will to its rational decision-making capacity. This guarantees that informed choices are possible even in cases rational decision making alone is indecisive. Further applications to modeling personality traits for human-robot interaction are discussed.

[1]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The dynamic window approach to collision avoidance , 1997, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[2]  R. Chang Voluntarist reasons and the sources of normativity , 2009 .

[3]  Felix Lindner,et al.  Affordance-Based Activity Placement in Human-Robot Shared Environments , 2013, ICSR.

[4]  Ipke Wachsmuth,et al.  Affective computing with primary and secondary emotions in a virtual human , 2009, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[5]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[6]  Bruce Christianson,et al.  A different approach of using Personas in human-robot interaction: Integrating Personas as computational models to modify robot companions' behaviour , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[7]  Felix Lindner Soziale Roboter und soziale Räume: eine Affordanz-basierte Konzeption zum rücksichtsvollen Handeln , 2015 .

[8]  Harry G. Frankfurt,et al.  The importance of what we care about: Freedom of the will and the concept of a person , 1971 .

[9]  Thomas Eiter,et al.  Answer Set Programming: A Primer , 2009, Reasoning Web.

[10]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Iterative design process for robots with personality , 2009 .

[11]  Thomas Rist,et al.  Integrating Models of Personality and Emotions into Lifelike Characters , 1999, IWAI.

[12]  Kai Oliver Arras,et al.  Robot-specific social cues in emotional body language , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Felix Lindner,et al.  A conceptual model of personal space for human-aware robot activity placement , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[14]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  Towards an intelligent system for generating an adapted verbal and nonverbal combined behavior in human–robot interaction , 2015, Autonomous Robots.

[15]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction , 2014, Journal of human-robot interaction.