Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks.

It is often asserted that friends and acquaintances have more similar beliefs and attitudes than do strangers; yet empirical studies disagree over exactly how much diversity of opinion exists within local social networks and, relatedly, how much awareness individuals have of their neighbors' views. This article reports results from a network survey, conducted on the Facebook social networking platform, in which participants were asked about their own political attitudes, as well as their beliefs about their friends' attitudes. Although considerable attitude similarity exists among friends, the results show that friends disagree more than they think they do. In particular, friends are typically unaware of their disagreements, even when they say they discuss the topic, suggesting that discussion is not the primary means by which friends infer each other's views on particular issues. Rather, it appears that respondents infer opinions in part by relying on stereotypes of their friends and in part by projecting their own views. The resulting gap between real and perceived agreement may have implications for the dynamics of political polarization and theories of social influence in general.

[1]  M. Sherif An experimental approach to the study of attitudes. , 1937 .

[2]  L. Guest The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. , 1946 .

[3]  Morroe Berger,et al.  Freedom and control in modern society , 1954 .

[4]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[6]  S. Asch Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[7]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[8]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[9]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[10]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[11]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[12]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[13]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[16]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations , 1984 .

[17]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Measuring Tie Strength , 1984 .

[18]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Perception of social distributions. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Norman Miller,et al.  Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review , 1987 .

[20]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. , 1987 .

[21]  T. K. Srull,et al.  A Dual process model of impression formation , 1988 .

[22]  D. Wayne Osgood,et al.  Influence and Similarity Among Friends: An Integrative Model Applied to Incarcerated Adolescents , 1989 .

[23]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[24]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  Social judgeability : the impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes , 1994 .

[25]  J. Krueger,et al.  The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  N. Schwarz,et al.  THE USE OF ANCHORING STRATEGIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROXY-REPORTS OF ATTITUDES , 1994 .

[27]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  How Well do you Know your Partner? Strategies for Formulating Proxy-Reports and Their Effects on Convergence to Self-Reports , 1995 .

[28]  John H. Evans,et al.  Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized? , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  R. Bond,et al.  Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. , 1996 .

[30]  M. Eckardt,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF INDIVIDUAL VULNERABILITY TO DRUGS , 1996 .

[31]  Jeffrey Levine,et al.  The Dynamics of Collective Deliberation in the 1996 Election: Campaign Effects on Accessibility, Certainty, and Accuracy , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[32]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy and bias in the perception of the partner in a close relationship. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[34]  J. Krueger,et al.  The Role of Self-Referent and Other-Referent Knowledge in Perceptions of Group Characteristics , 2001 .

[35]  Robert Huckfeldt,et al.  The Social Communication of Political Expertise , 2001 .

[36]  D. Ames,et al.  Strategies for social inference: a similarity contingency model of projection and stereotyping in attribute prevalence estimates. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  P. Bearman,et al.  Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topics and Network Structure , 2004 .

[38]  R. Goldsmith The Influentials: One American in Ten Tells the Other Nine How to Vote, Where to Eat, and What to Buy , 2004 .

[39]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Political Disagreement: The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks , 2004 .

[40]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology , 1995, Quality of Life Research.

[42]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE / WIC / ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence , 2005 .

[43]  J. Krueger,et al.  Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[44]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Tracking information epidemics in blogspace , 2005, The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'05).

[45]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[46]  Luk Warlop,et al.  Why it is so Hard to Predict Our Partner's Product Preferences: The Effect of Target Familiarity on Prediction Accuracy , 2006 .

[47]  S. Levin,et al.  The dynamics of political polarization , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  J. Krueger From social projection to social behaviour , 2007 .

[49]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[50]  D. Boyd Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[51]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do , 2008 .

[52]  A. Gelman,et al.  Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. , 2008, AJS; American journal of sociology.

[53]  Bill Bishop,et al.  The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart , 2008 .

[54]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Is Polarization a Myth? , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[55]  N. Christakis,et al.  Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[56]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[57]  Gabriel S. Lenz Andrew Gelman, David Park, Boris Shor, Joseph Bafumi, and Jeronimo Cortina. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do , 2009 .

[58]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Going to Extremes: How Like Minds Unite and Divide , 2009 .

[59]  Penny S. Visser,et al.  Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks , 2009 .

[60]  E. Laumann,et al.  Friends of Urban Men: An Assessment of Accuracy in Reporting Their Socioeconomic Attributes, Mutual Choice, and Attitude Agreement , 2016 .