Effet du voisinage phonologique sur l’accès lexical dans le discours spontané de patients Alzheimer (Effect of phonological neighborhood density on lexical retrieval in the spontaneous speech of patients with Alzheimer’s disease) [in French]

Le manque du mot, trouble survenant precocement dans la maladie d'Alzheimer souvent interprete comme la perte des representations dans la memoire semantique, complique l'acces lexical. Les aspects phonologiques sont reputes etre plus resistants. La densite de voisinage phonologique (nombre de mots qui ne different d'un mot cible que par un phoneme) a fait l'objet de nombreuses etudes lesquelles observent l'effet facilitateur d'un voisinage phonologique dense. Si le systeme de representation phonologique est preserve chez les patients, on devrait observer un effet facilitateur pour la production des mots ayant un voisinage phonologique dense. 20 patients Alzheimer et 20 sujets controles ont produit un discours spontane duquel ont ete extraits des mots difficiles vs faciles a recuperer. La frequence et le nombre de voisins phonologiques ont ete calcules pour chacune des deux listes de mots. Chez les patients, les mots faciles a recuperer sont significativement plus frequents et ont un voisinage phonologique plus dense, ce qui suggere que l'acces lexical est particulierement sensible a ces effets chez les patients Alzheimer.relative augmente de facon significative avec l'âge et qu'il existe une tres grande variabilite inter-individuelle. Par ailleurs, les rires etudies se caracterisent par une grande majorite de contours montant-descendant et leur proportion augmente en fonction de l'âge.

[1]  M. Vitevitch,et al.  The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. , 1996, Language and speech.

[2]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Phonological and Articulatory Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease: A Case Series , 2000, Brain and Language.

[3]  M. Vitevitch The Neighborhood Characteristics of Malapropisms , 1997 .

[4]  B. Reisberg,et al.  Functional Staging of Dementia of the Alzheimer Type , 1984 .

[5]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[6]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[7]  P. Luce,et al.  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: retroactive effects on multiple activation. , 1990, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[8]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[9]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Guila Glosser,et al.  Cognitive Mechanisms for Processing Nonwords: Evidence from Alzheimer's Disease , 1998, Brain and Language.

[11]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS—ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease , 2011, Neurology.

[12]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[13]  Mark Liberman,et al.  Transcriber: Development and use of a tool for assisting speech corpora production , 2001, Speech Commun..

[14]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production Differences and Similarities , 2010 .

[15]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[16]  Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two-syllable words: retroactive effects on multiple activation. , 1990 .

[17]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Processing of verb-argument structure and subcategorization information in brain-damaged patients: Event-related potential evidence , 2001 .

[18]  J. Grainger Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .

[19]  Holly L Storkel,et al.  Methods for minimizing the confounding effects of word length in the analysis of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[20]  Audrey K. Kittredge,et al.  Effects of near and distant phonological neighbors on picture naming , 2010 .

[21]  J. Gordon Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: spontaneous and structured contexts , 2002, Brain and Language.

[22]  M. Sommers,et al.  Inhibitory processes and spoken word recognition in young and older adults: the interaction of lexical competition and semantic context. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[23]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  What causes a tip-of-the-tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production , 1998 .

[24]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  R. Glushko The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[26]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? , 2003 .