Blowfly yaw control via electrical stimulation of the H1 lobula plate tangential cell

Eliciting predictable flight responses in insects via exogenous stimulation of the nervous system is an area of both scientific and engineering interest. Blowflies in particular possess an excellent biological flight control system, making them an ideal system for characterising responses to stimulation. Here we demonstrate a means of electrically controlling Calliphoridae-Protophormia terranovae wing behaviour, generating a repeatable yaw response via biphasic electrical stimulation of the H1 lobula plate tangential cell (LPTC). We found that a 10 mA current pulse at a frequency of 30–270 Hz produces a yaw response in the preferred direction of H1 in a tethered blowfly preparation, and the magnitude of the yaw response is proportional to the frequency of the stimulus. This result suggests that these LPTCs, which encode optic flow, may be a viable interface for controlling fly flight behaviour. This platform could find application not only for micro air vehicles (MAVs), but also in developing flight models or for studying neurological control of fly flight behaviour.

[1]  A. Borst,et al.  Fly motion vision. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  Holger G. Krapp,et al.  Closed-loop response properties of a visual interneuron involved in fly optomotor control , 2013, Front. Neural Circuits.

[3]  Changfeng Tai,et al.  The Role of Slow Potassium Current in Nerve Conduction Block Induced by High-Frequency Biphasic Electrical Current , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  J. Blondeau,et al.  Electrically Evoked Course Control in the Fly Calliphora Erythrocephala , 1981 .

[5]  F. Lehmann,et al.  Turning behaviour depends on frictional damping in the fruit fly Drosophila , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  Martin Egelhaaf,et al.  Blowfly flight characteristics are shaped by environmental features and controlled by optic flow information , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  A. Borst,et al.  Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  Chun-Fang Wu,et al.  A MODIFIED MINIMAL HEMOLYMPH-LIKE SOLUTION, HL3.1, FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL RECORDINGS AT THE NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTIONS OF NORMAL AND MUTANT DROSOPHILA LARVAE , 2004, Journal of neurogenetics.

[9]  Henry Won,et al.  Development of the Nano Hummingbird: A Tailless Flapping Wing Micro Air Vehicle , 2012 .

[10]  Kristofer S. J. Pister,et al.  First takeoff of a flying microrobot with no moving parts , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS).

[11]  G K Taylor,et al.  Mechanics and aerodynamics of insect flight control , 2001, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[12]  Alicia L. Jensen,et al.  High frequency stimulation can block axonal conduction , 2009, Experimental Neurology.

[13]  Hirotaka Sato,et al.  Remote Radio Control of Insect Flight , 2009, Frontiers in integrative neuroscience.

[14]  Luca Petricca,et al.  Micro- and Nano-Air Vehicles: State of the Art , 2011 .

[15]  D. Pines,et al.  Challenges Facing Future Micro-Air-Vehicle Development , 2006 .