On the interpretative flexibility of hosted ERP systems

Abstract This paper explores the interpretative flexibility of ERP systems through the study of a project to implement a hosted system for the Central Accounting Department of a large multinational. The paper presents intensive case study data around the decision to implement the system and analyses it in terms of the interpretative flexibility of the system. The paper questions the extent to which technological features of the new system influence the perceived flexibility of the system.

[1]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[2]  Annemarie Mol,et al.  Complexities: An Introduction , 2002, Complexities.

[3]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[4]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[5]  E. Wagner.  Narrating an organisational matter of fact: Negotiating with enterprise resource planning technology to achieve order within a traditional academic administration. , 2003 .

[6]  H. S. Wilson,et al.  Methodologic mistakes in grounded theory. , 1996, Nursing research.

[7]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[8]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[9]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[10]  Norman Balabanian,et al.  The Golem at large: what you should know about technology , 1999, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[11]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Structuration Theory in the IS Field: An Assessment of Research Strategies , 2001, ECIS.

[12]  Gordon A. Gow,et al.  Canadian Telecommunications Policy and the National Disaster Mitigation Strategy: Observing Wireless E9-1-1 , 2002 .

[13]  Ghislaine M. Lawrence.  The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology , 1989, Medical History.

[14]  J. Morse.  Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods , 1993 .

[15]  J. Ross.  The ERP Revolution : Surviving Versus Thriving , 2001 .

[16]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  Case study research: a multi‐faceted research approach for IS , 1996, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Machine Agency as Perceived Autonomy: An Action Perspective , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[18]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research. Second Edition. , 2000 .

[20]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2000 .

[21]  L. Winner.  Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology , 1993 .

[22]  John C. Mallinson,et al.  Preface to Second Edition , 2002 .

[23]  Rob Kling,et al.  Does technology drive history? The dilemma of technological determinism , 1996 .

[24]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[25]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[26]  Knut H. Rolland.  Challenging the Installed Base: Deploying a Large-Scale IS in a Global Organization , 2000, ECIS.

[27]  A. Pouloudi,et al.  Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: gaining insights for drug use management systems , 1997 .

[28]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[29]  A. Pickering.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[30]  N. Denzin,et al.  The discipline and practice of qualitative research [Introduction]. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed. , 2000 .

[31]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[32]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[33]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[34]  Olga Volkoff,et al.  Using the Structurational Model of Technology to Analyze an ERP Implementation , 1999 .

[35]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From tool to Gestell: agendas for managing the information infrastructure , 1998 .

[37]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work , 1996, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology.

[38]  Marlei Pozzebon,et al.  Demystifying the Rhetorical Closure of ERP Packages , 2001, ICIS.

[39]  M. Miles.  Qualitative Data as an Attractive Nuisance: The Problem of Analysis , 1979 .

[40]  W. Scott.  The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[41]  B. Turner,et al.  Grounded Theory and Organizational Research , 1986 .

[42]  H. M. Collins,et al.  Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism , 1981 .

[43]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Reopening the Black Box of Technology Artifacts and Human Agency , 2002, ICIS.

[44]  Kristin Braa,et al.  Technology as traitor: emergent SAP infrastructure in a global organization , 1998, ICIS '98.

[45]  Felix Stalder,et al.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[46]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  Predicting the implementation effort of ERP projects: empirical evidence on SAP/R3 , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[47]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[48]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites , 1990 .

[49]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[51]  L. Zucker.  The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[52]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  A relativist approach to studying the social construction of information technology , 1994 .

[53]  David A. Buchanan,et al.  Advanced technology and the quality of working life: The effects of computerized controls on biscuit‐making operators , 1983 .

[54]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Configuring peer-to-peer software: an empirical study of how users react to the regulatory features of software , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Ann,et al.  Truth and method , 1994, Journal of Religion and Health.

[56]  Kenneth E. Murphy,et al.  Intangible benefits valuation in ERP projects , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[57]  Han van Dissel,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: ERP system migrations , 2000, CACM.

[58]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 1990, ICIS.

[59]  M. Archer,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach , 1997 .

[60]  Robert L. Heilbroner,et al.  Do Machines Make History? , 1967 .

[61]  R. Stredwick.  Epistemological Boundaries and Methodological Confusions in Postmodern, Consumer Research , 2001 .

[62]  Antony Bryant,et al.  Grounding systems research: re-establishing grounded theory , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[63]  B. Galliers,et al.  The Journal of Strategic Information Systems , 1996 .

[64]  Bonnie Mae Kaplan,et al.  Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice , 2004 .

[65]  Richard A. Shweder,et al.  Culture theory : essays on mind, self, and emotion , 1986 .

[66]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Implementing Packaged Software , 1987, MIS Q..

[68]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[69]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[70]  Hugh Preston,et al.  Information Systems and Global Diversity , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[71]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[72]  Sue Newell,et al.  Implementing enterprise resource planning and knowledge management systems in tandem: fostering efficiency and innovation complementarity , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[73]  Marc Berg,et al.  Guest editors' introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[74]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information systems and qualitative research , 1997 .

[75]  Philip J. Dobson.  Investigating erp systems using structuration theory - a critique , 2001 .

[76]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[77]  Jonathan H. Turner,et al.  Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach.By Margaret S. Archer. Cambridge University Press, 354 pp , 1997 .

[78]  B. Latour.  Aramis, or the Love of Technology , 1993 .

[79]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Organizational transition to enterprise resource planning systems: theoretical choices for process research , 1999, ICIS.

[80]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[81]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[82]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[83]  J. Law,et al.  Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices , 2002 .

[84]  Knut Blind,et al.  The Economics of Standards , 2004 .

[85]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Making Contributions From Interpretive Case Studies: Examining Processes of Construction and Use , 2004, Relevant Theory and Informed Practice.

[86]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[87]  Deborah G. . Ancona.  Outward Bound: Strategic for Team Survival in an Organization , 1990 .

[88]  A. Roland,et al.  Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism. , 1995 .

[89]  Bongsug Chae,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of Large-Scale Information Systems , 2001, ICIS.

[90]  Christina Goulding,et al.  Grounded Theory: some reflections on paradigm, procedures and misconceptions , 1999 .

[91]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[92]  R. Baskerville,et al.  Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology , 2013, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[93]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[94]  Han van Dissel,et al.  ERP System Migrations. , 2000 .

[95]  A. Giddens.  Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[96]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[97]  H. Gadamer,et al.  Truth and Method , 1960 .

[98]  C. Ciborra.  Teams, Markets and Systems: Business Innovation and Information Technology , 1993 .

[99]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..