Assessing propensity to learn from safety-related events

Most organisations aim to use experience from the past to improve safety, for instance through learning from safety-related incidents and accidents. Whether an organisation is able to learn successfully can however only be determined afterwards. So far, there are no proactive measures to assess whether an organisation will be able to learn from experience, meaning whether an organisation has the propensity to learn. In this study we aimed to develop a set of indicators for the propensity to learn as part of the leading indicators for safety. To assess the propensity to learn, the individual perception of learning from experience is measured, through a set of indicators. These indicators are validated through interviews on a French production site. This organisation showed a high propensity to learn, despite some minor weaknesses with respect to involvement of employees and sharing information. On an individual level, 17% of the employees had a very positive attitude towards each step of the learning process. The proposed indicators could support the identification of weaknesses with respect to learning on an organisational level and they could facilitate the identification of training needs of the employees. Further development and tests of the indicators are however needed to apply them on a wider scale.

[1]  Phyllis Butow,et al.  Is it worth the risk? A systematic review of instruments that measure risk propensity for use in the health setting. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Mark Keil,et al.  An investigation of risk perception and risk propensity on the decision to continue a software development project , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[3]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  Organisational Crisis- Preparedness: The Importance of Learning from Failures , 2008 .

[4]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Eric T. Donnell,et al.  Application of propensity scores and potential outcomes to estimate effectiveness of traffic safety countermeasures: Exploratory analysis using intersection lighting data. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Predicting propensity to actively care for occupational safety , 1996 .

[7]  Robert L. Armstrong,et al.  The Midpoint on a Five-Point Likert-Type Scale , 1987 .

[8]  Stephanie C. Payne,et al.  The influence of individual differences on organizational safety attitudes , 2009 .

[9]  L. Pelton,et al.  A higher-order model of risk propensity , 2009 .

[10]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce , 2007 .

[11]  J. Carroll.  Organizational Learning Activities in High‐hazard Industries: The Logics Underlying Self‐Analysis , 1998 .

[12]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  Organizational Learning Capability and Job Satisfaction: An Empirical Assessment in the Ceramic Tile Industry , 2009 .

[14]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, second edition , 2007 .

[15]  Eli P. Cox,et al.  The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: A review. , 1980 .

[16]  Babette Fahlbruch,et al.  SOL – Safety through organizational learning: A method for event analysis , 2011 .

[17]  Maurice Bonney,et al.  Are push and pull systems really so different , 1999 .

[18]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Learning from accidents : what more do we need to know? , 2010 .

[19]  Julie Hatfield,et al.  The role of risk-propensity in the risky driving of younger drivers. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  The challenge of collective learning from event analysis , 2011 .

[21]  E. Stern.  Crisis and Learning: A Conceptual Balance Sheet , 1997 .

[22]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research , 2000 .

[23]  Marcel Simard,et al.  Workgroups' propensity to comply with safety rules: the influence of micro-macro organisational factors , 1997 .

[24]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Exploring the notion of information push and pull with respect to the user intention and disruption , 2001 .

[25]  Jean-Luc Wybo.  Percolation, temporal coherence of information, and crisis prevention , 2013 .

[26]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  Leading Indicators of Safety in Virtual Organizations , 2007 .

[27]  S. Gilliland,et al.  Why we do the things we do: A discussion and analysis of determinants of just treatment in layoff implementation decisions , 2003 .

[28]  Mel Schnake,et al.  An integrative model of effort propensity , 2007 .

[29]  C. W. Fuller,et al.  An assessment of the relationship between behaviour and injury in the workplace: A case study in professional football , 2005 .

[30]  Charles Johnson,et al.  Software tools to support incident reporting in safety-critical systems , 2002 .

[31]  Pierre-André Julien,et al.  Networks, weak signals and technological innovations among SMEs in the land-based transportation equipment sector , 2004 .

[32]  Adrian L Sepeda,et al.  Lessons learned from process incident databases and the process safety incident database (PSID) approach sponsored by the Center for Chemical Process Safety. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[33]  Pilar Jerez-Gómez,et al.  Organizational learning and compensation strategies: Evidence from the Spanish chemical industry , 2005 .

[34]  Paul W. H. Chung,et al.  The integration of accident databases with computer tools in the chemical industry , 1998 .

[35]  F. Champagne,et al.  Beyond resistance: exploring health managers' propensity for participatory evaluation in a developing country. , 2012, Evaluation and program planning.

[36]  R. Garland.  The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable? , 1991 .

[37]  Gregory Richards,et al.  Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations , 1997 .

[38]  Øyvind Dahl,et al.  Safety compliance on offshore platforms: A multi-sample survey on the role of perceived leadership involvement and work climate , 2013 .

[39]  J. H. Gittell,et al.  High‐quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations , 2009 .

[40]  Bernd Rohrmann,et al.  Risk Attitude Scales: Concepts, Questionnaires, Utilizations , 2008 .

[41]  Nick McDonald.  Deriving Organisational Principles for Safety Management Systems from the Analysis of Aircraft Ramp Accidents , 1997 .

[42]  George S. Day,et al.  How to Make Sense of Weak Signals , 2009 .

[43]  James C. Ryan,et al.  Leadership effects on innovation propensity: A two-factor full range leadership model , 2013 .

[44]  John T. Kulas,et al.  Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings , 2009 .

[45]  Elaine Aspinwall,et al.  A survey on occupational accidents' reporting and registration systems in the European Union , 2004 .

[46]  Ingrid Bouwer Utne,et al.  Building Safety indicators: Part 2 - Application, practices and results , 2011 .

[47]  A. Boin.  Public Leadership in Times of Crisis: Mission Impossible? , 2003 .

[48]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[49]  Hussein A. Abdou,et al.  Factors influencing the propensity to export: A study of UK and Portuguese textile firms , 2012 .

[50]  Ambre Brizon,et al.  The life cycle of weak signals related to safety , 2009 .

[51]  Linda Drupsteen,et al.  Critical Steps in Learning From Incidents: Using Learning Potential in the Process From Reporting an Incident to Accident Prevention , 2013, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[52]  K. Popper.  The Propensity Interpretation of Probability , 1959 .