The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials.

Bone resorption around hip stems is a disturbing phenomenon, although its clinical significance and its eventual effects on replacement longevity are as yet uncertain. The relationship between implant flexibility and the extent of bone loss, frequently established in clinical patient series and animal experiments, does suggest that the changes in bone morphology are an effect of stress shielding and a subsequent adaptive remodeling process. This relationship was investigated using strain-adaptive bone-remodeling theory in combination with finite element models to simulate the bone remodeling process. The effects of stem material flexibility, bone flexibility, and bone reactivity on the process and its eventual outcome were studied. Stem flexibility was also related to proximal implant/bone interface stresses. The results sustain the hypothesis that the resorptive processes are an effect of bone adaptation to stress shielding. The effects of stem flexibility are confirmed by the simulation analysis. It was also established that individual differences in bone reactivity and mechanical bone quality (density and stiffness) may account for the individual variations found in patients and animal experiments. Flexible stems reduce stress shielding and bone resorption. However, they increase proximal interface stresses. Hence, the cure against bone resorption they represent may develop into increased loosening rates because of interface debonding and micromotion. The methods presented in this paper can be used to establish optimal stem-design characteristics or check the adequacy of designs in preclinical testing procedures.

[1]  R. Huiskes The various stress patterns of press-fit, ingrown, and cemented femoral stems. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  J. Bobyn,et al.  The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[4]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Computer predictions of bone remodeling around porous-coated implants. , 1990, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  W. Maloney,et al.  Biomechanical and histologic investigation of cemented total hip arthroplasties. A study of autopsy-retrieved femurs after in vivo cycling. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  H Weinans,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1989, Orthopedics.

[7]  Engh Ca,et al.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. , 1988 .

[8]  J. Galante,et al.  A comparative study of porous coatings in a weight-bearing total hip-arthroplasty model. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  E. Radin Mechanical Adaptations of bone , 1985 .

[10]  John D. Currey,et al.  The Mechanical Adaptations of Bones , 1984 .

[11]  D T Davy,et al.  A computational method for stress analysis of adaptive elastic materials with a view toward applications in strain-induced bone remodeling. , 1984, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  J L Lewis,et al.  The influence of prosthetic stem stiffness and of a calcar collar on stresses in the proximal end of the femur with a cemented femoral component. , 1984, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  S. Cowin,et al.  Bone remodeling I: theory of adaptive elasticity , 1976 .

[14]  R. Martin,et al.  The effects of geometric feedback in the development of osteoporosis. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  D. Carter,et al.  Relationships between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  C. Engh,et al.  The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  D P Fyhrie,et al.  Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  H Roesler,et al.  The history of some fundamental concepts in bone biomechanics. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  C. Engh,et al.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  R. Martin Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[22]  Martin Rb Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[23]  R Huiskes,et al.  Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures. , 1980, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.