Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception.

[1]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[2]  W. Lichten,et al.  A new technique for the study of perceived size. , 1950, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  Allen L. Edwards,et al.  Experimental Design in Psychological Research. , 1951 .

[4]  E. Boring,et al.  The bibsonian visual field. , 1952, Psychological review.

[5]  W. H. Ittelson.  Size as a cue to distance. , 1952 .

[6]  W. M. Smith.  Past experience and the perception of visual size. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  J. Gibson,et al.  The visual field and the visual world: a reply to Professor Boring. , 1952, Psychological review.

[8]  Apparent Size with and without Distance Cues , 1952 .

[9]  Chalmers El.  Monocular and binocular cues in the perception of size and distance. , 1952 .

[10]  J. Hochberg,et al.  Familiar size and the perception of depth. , 1952 .

[11]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Familiar Size and Subception in Perceived Depth , 1953 .

[12]  H. Gruber.  The relation of perceived size to perceived distance. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  A. S. Gilinsky,et al.  The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  J E HOCHBERG,et al.  Relative size vs. familiar size in the perception of represented depth. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  The retinal size of a familiar object as a determiner of apparent distance. , 1957 .

[16]  V. L. Senders,et al.  Measurement and statistics , 1958 .

[17]  H WALLACH,et al.  On size-perception in the absence of cues for distance. , 1960, The American journal of psychology.

[18]  W. Epstein,et al.  The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. , 1961, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Carlson Vr,et al.  Size-constancy judgments and perceptual compromise. , 1962 .