Not all systematic reviews are created equal

The authors discuss the reality of variations in reviewing a special issue of systematic reviews and the need to thoroughly evaluate all reviews.

[1]  Beth Pfeiffer,et al.  Effectiveness of Cognitive and Occupation‐Based Interventions for Children With Challenges in Sensory Processing and Integration: A Systematic Review , 2017, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  R. Schaaf,et al.  Efficacy of Occupational Therapy Using Ayres Sensory Integration®: A Systematic Review , 2017, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[3]  P. Tugwell,et al.  AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[4]  Beth Pfeiffer,et al.  State of the Science of Sensory Integration Research With Children and Youth , 2017, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[5]  S. Bodison,et al.  Specific Sensory Techniques and Sensory Environmental Modifications for Children and Youth With Sensory Integration Difficulties: A Systematic Review , 2017, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[6]  heatheR milleR-KuhanecK,et al.  Parental or Teacher Education and Coaching to Support Function and Participation of Children and Youth With Sensory Processing and Sensory Integration Challenges: A Systematic Review , 2017, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.