Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities.

The cochlear implant is the most successful of all neural prostheses developed to date. It is the most effective prosthesis in terms of restoration of function, and the people who have received a cochlear implant outnumber the recipients of other types of neural prostheses by orders of magnitude. The primary purpose of this article is to provide an overview of contemporary cochlear implants from the perspective of two designers of implant systems. That perspective includes the anatomical situation presented by the deaf cochlea and how the different parts of an implant system (including the user's brain) must work together to produce the best results. In particular, we present the design considerations just mentioned and then describe in detail how the current levels of performance have been achieved. We also describe two recent advances in implant design and performance. In concluding sections, we first present strengths and limitations of present systems and then offer some possibilities for further improvements in this technology. In all, remarkable progress has been made in the development of cochlear implants but much room still remains for improvements, especially for patients presently at the low end of the performance spectrum.

[1]  Mark Downing,et al.  Current Steering Creates Additional Pitch Percepts in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  Chris van den Honert,et al.  Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  L Whitford,et al.  Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. , 1996, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[4]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[5]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  The Surprising Performance of Present-Day Cochlear Implants , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[7]  J. Müller,et al.  Speech Understanding in Quiet and Noise in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant System , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[8]  M. Dorman,et al.  Rapid development of cortical auditory evoked potentials after early cochlear implantation , 2002, Neuroreport.

[9]  Q. Fu Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users , 2002, Neuroreport.

[10]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[11]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Markus Brunner,et al.  Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[13]  Richard Ramsden,et al.  Speech Understanding in Noise with a Med-El COMBI 40+ Cochlear Implant Using Reduced Channel Sets , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Andrew K. Wise,et al.  Neurotrophic Factors and Neural Prostheses: Potential Clinical Applications Based Upon Findings in the Auditory System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  T. Kubo,et al.  Cochlear Implants-An Update , 2002 .

[16]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Three-Month Results with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[17]  J. Guinan Physiology of Olivocochlear Efferents , 1996 .

[18]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  The design and function of cochlear implants , 2004 .

[19]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of a Clinical Study , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[20]  H Plenk,et al.  Perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implant surgery. , 2001, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[21]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  P. Blamey,et al.  Are spiral ganglion cell numbers important for speech perception with a cochlear implant? , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[23]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Deafness-Induced Changes in the Auditory Pathway: Implications for Cochlear Implants , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.

[25]  Aaron Parkinson,et al.  Simultaneous Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Multicenter Clinical Study , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[26]  Cummings Cw Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol [Suppl]. , 1978 .

[27]  P. Dallos The active cochlea , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  I. Whitfield Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve , 1966 .

[29]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Combined Electroacoustic Stimulation in Conventional Candidates for Cochlear Implantation , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[30]  Richard Ramsden,et al.  Evaluation of Bilaterally Implanted Adult Subjects with the Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[31]  E Lehnhardt,et al.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique]. , 1993, HNO.

[32]  Stephen J. Rebscher,et al.  Anatomical Considerations and Long-Term Effects of Electrical Stimulation , 2004 .

[33]  M. Kompis,et al.  Minimum Audible Angle, Just Noticeable Interaural Differences and Speech Intelligibility with Bilateral Cochlear Implants Using Clinical Speech Processors , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[34]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[35]  C. Buchman,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts , 2005, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[36]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: A histologically controlled insertion study , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[37]  J. J. Grote,et al.  The Importance of Human Cochlear Anatomy for the Results of Modiolus-Hugging Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[38]  Bruce C. Wheeler,et al.  Survival and stimulation of neurite outgrowth in a serum-free culture of spiral ganglion neurons from adult mice , 2007, Hearing Research.

[39]  M F Dorman,et al.  Recognition of Monosyllabic Words by Cochlear Implant Patients and by Normal-Hearing Subjects Listening to Words Processed through Cochlear Implant Signal Processing Strategies , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[40]  D. Grantham,et al.  Horizontal-Plane Localization of Noise and Speech Signals by Postlingually Deafened Adults Fitted With Bilateral Cochlear Implants* , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[41]  I. Hochmair,et al.  Cochlear Implants : State of the Art and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2006 .

[42]  P Nopp,et al.  Sound Localization in Bilateral Users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implants , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[43]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1984, Hearing Research.

[44]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Preservation of low frequency hearing in partial deafness cochlear implantation (PDCI) using the round window surgical approach , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[45]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Encoding frequency Modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[46]  D. Hilbert Grundzuge Einer Allgemeinen Theorie Der Linearen Integralgleichungen , 2009 .

[47]  M. Dorman,et al.  Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[48]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Benefits of Bilateral Electrical Stimulation with the Nucleus Cochlear Implant in Adults: 6-Month Postoperative Results , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[49]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Deafness: Cross-modal plasticity and cochlear implants , 2001, Nature.

[50]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Acoustic Simulations of Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing (EAS) , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[51]  R. Normann,et al.  Development of a Novel Eighth‐Nerve Intraneural Auditory Neuroprosthesis , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[52]  Richard A Normann,et al.  Cochlear Nerve Stimulation with a 3-Dimensional Penetrating Electrode Array , 2003, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[53]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  A comparison of the speech understanding provided by acoustic models of fixed-channel and channel-picking signal processors for cochlear implants. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[54]  P Nopp,et al.  Sound Localization and Sensitivity to Interaural Cues in Bilateral Users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+Cochlear Implant System , 2005, Otology and Neurotology.

[55]  Á. Ramos,et al.  Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: A 6-month comparative study , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[56]  W Baumgartner,et al.  Evaluation of performance with the COMBI40 cochlear implant in adults: a multicentric clinical study. , 1997, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[57]  Huw Cooper,et al.  Cochlear Implants: A Practical Guide , 2006 .

[58]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Engineering Design of Cochlear Implants , 2004 .

[59]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[60]  Adrien A Eshraghi,et al.  Modiolar Proximity of Three Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Electrodes , 2002, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[61]  Richard A Normann,et al.  Electrode Independence in Intraneural Cochlear Nerve Stimulation , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[62]  B S Wilson,et al.  The future of cochlear implants. , 1997, British journal of audiology.

[63]  J. Nadol,et al.  Is Word Recognition Correlated With the Number of Surviving Spiral Ganglion Cells and Electrode Insertion Depth in Human Subjects With Cochlear Implants? , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[64]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: How and why , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[65]  Makoto Miura,et al.  Analysis of Spiral Ganglion Cell Populations in Children with Normal and Pathological Ears , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[66]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status , 1997, Hearing Research.

[67]  Alexander Joseph Book reviewDischarge patterns of single fibers in the cat's auditory nerve: Nelson Yuan-Sheng Kiang, with the assistance of Takeshi Watanabe, Eleanor C. Thomas and Louise F. Clark: Research Monograph no. 35. Cambridge, Mass., The M.I.T. Press, 1965 , 1967 .

[68]  J. Fayad,et al.  Multichannel Cochlear Implants: Relation of Histopathology to Performance , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[69]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[70]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch ranking with nonsimultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[71]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[72]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing , 2002, Hearing Research.

[73]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[74]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[75]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: some likely next steps. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[76]  J. T Rubinstein,et al.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[77]  Robert S. C. Cowan,et al.  Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour™ and straight Nucleus electrode arrays , 2006, Hearing Research.

[78]  S. Waltzman,et al.  17 Speech Perception by Adults with Multichannel Cochlear Implants , 2006 .

[79]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Application of a Corticosteroid (Triamcinolon) Protects Inner Ear Function after Surgical Intervention , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[80]  Donald L. Swiderski,et al.  Cochlear implants and ex vivo BDNF gene therapy protect spiral ganglion neurons , 2007, Hearing Research.

[81]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  HiResolutionTM and Conventional Sound Processing in the HiResolutionTM Bionic Ear: Using Appropriate Outcome Measures to Assess Speech Recognition Ability , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[82]  Uwe Baumann,et al.  Pulse rate discrimination with deeply inserted electrode arrays , 2004, Hearing Research.

[83]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Residual Hearing Conservation and Electroacoustic Stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance Cochlear Implant , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[85]  Richard Van Hoesel,et al.  Sound-Direction Identification, Interaural Time Delay Discrimination, and Speech Intelligibility Advantages in Noise for a Bilateral Cochlear Implant User , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[86]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[87]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Acoustic plus Electric Speech Processing: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[88]  P. Nopp,et al.  Head Shadow, Squelch, and Summation Effects in Bilateral Users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ Cochlear Implant , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[89]  B.S. Wilson,et al.  Interfacing Sensors With the Nervous System: Lessons From the Development and Success of the Cochlear Implant , 2008, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[90]  R L Smith Cochlear processes reflected in responses of the cochlear nerve. , 1985, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[91]  Sharon A McKarns,et al.  The Benefits of Combining Acoustic and Electric Stimulation for the Recognition of Speech, Voice and Melodies , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[92]  H. Arts,et al.  Prosthetic Stimulation of the Auditory System with Intraneural Electrodes , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[93]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Preservation of Basal Inner Ear Structures in Cochlear Implantation , 2005, ORL.

[94]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[95]  Christopher Turner,et al.  Accuracy of Cochlear Implant Recipients on Pitch Perception, Melody Recognition, and Speech Reception in Noise , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[96]  B. S. Wilson,et al.  Comparative studies of speech processing strategies for cochlear implants , 1988, The Laryngoscope.

[97]  Richard S. Tyler,et al.  Speech Perception and Localization With Adults With Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implants , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[98]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[99]  J K Shallop,et al.  Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[100]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL ASPECTS AND FIRST RESULTS OF THE CLINICAL APPLICATION OF COMBINED ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION OF THE AUDITORY SYSTEM , 2004 .

[101]  M. Dorman,et al.  Performance of Patients Using Different Cochlear Implant Systems: Effects of Input Dynamic Range , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[102]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  [New method of partial deafness treatment]. , 2003, Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology.

[103]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Preservation of Residual Hearing in Children and Post-Lingually Deafened Adults after Cochlear Implantation: An Initial Study , 2002, ORL.

[104]  Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .

[105]  Nicole Sislian,et al.  Sound-Direction Identification with Bilateral Cochlear Implants , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[106]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[107]  R. Tyler,et al.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[108]  C von Ilberg,et al.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. , 1999, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[109]  Jeroen J. Briaire,et al.  Initial Evaluation of the Clarion CII Cochlear Implant: Speech Perception and Neural Response Imaging , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[110]  R Hinojosa,et al.  HISTOPATHOLOGY OF PROFOUND SENSORINEURAL DEAFNESS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[111]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Localization ability with bimodal hearing aids and bilateral cochlear implants. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[112]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Cochlear implants in adults and children. , 1995, NIH consensus statement.

[113]  Clemens Zierhofer,et al.  Frequency discrimination with sequential or simultaneous stimulation in MED-EL cochlear implants , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[114]  Jacob Oleson,et al.  Music Perception with Cochlear Implants and Residual Hearing , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[115]  Blake S Wilson,et al.  Two New Directions in Speech Processor Design for Cochlear Implants , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[116]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Optimized Speech Understanding with the Continuous Interleaved Sampling Speech Coding Strategy in Patients with Cochlear Implants: Effect of Variations in Stimulation Rate and Number of Channels , 2000, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[117]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[118]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Partial deafness cochlear implantation provides benefit to a new population of individuals with hearing loss , 2006, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[119]  Richard S Tyler,et al.  Update on bilateral cochlear implantation , 2003, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[120]  Eric I. Knudsen,et al.  Incremental training increases the plasticity of the auditory space map in adult barn owls , 2002, Nature.

[121]  N. Cohen,et al.  Cochlear Implants , 2000 .

[122]  M. Lutman,et al.  Auditory Localization Abilities in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[123]  D T Lawson,et al.  Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[124]  M. Fink National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference. , 1985, Convulsive therapy.

[125]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children , 1995 .

[126]  F. Schön,et al.  Speech Reception Thresholds Obtained in a Symmetrical Four-Loudspeaker Arrangement from Bilateral Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[127]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[128]  B. Wilson,et al.  Cochlear Implants: Principles & Practices , 2000 .

[129]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[130]  M. Hansen,et al.  Strategies to preserve or regenerate spiral ganglion neurons , 2005, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[131]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Enhancing temporal cues to voice pitch in continuous interleaved sampling cochlear implants. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[132]  Mark Downing,et al.  Using Current Steering to Increase Spectral Resolution in CII and HiRes 90K Users , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[133]  Odlyzko THE PATH FROM RESEARCH TO HUMAN BENEFIT , 2022 .

[134]  Ruth Y Litovsky,et al.  Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[135]  Teresa Y. C. Ching,et al.  Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[136]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[137]  J. C. Middlebrooks,et al.  Auditory Prosthesis with a Penetrating Nerve Array , 2007, Journal for the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[138]  Gail S Donaldson,et al.  Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[139]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Histopathology of Cochlear Implants in Humans , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[140]  Silke Helbig,et al.  Ipsilateral Electric Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of Long-Term Hearing Preservation , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[141]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[142]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Binaural Cochlear Implants Placed during the Same Operation , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[143]  Francis A Spelman,et al.  Cochlear Electrode Arrays: Past, Present and Future , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.