Does health information technology improve acknowledgement of radiology results for discharged Emergency Department patients? A before and after study

Background The inadequate follow-up of test results is a key patient safety concern, carrying severe consequences for care outcomes. Patients discharged from the emergency department are at particular risk of having test results pending at discharge due to their short lengths of stay, with many hospitals acknowledging that they do not have reliable systems for managing such results. Health information technology hold the potential to reducing errors in the test result management process. This study aimed to measure changes in the proportion of acknowledged radiology reports pre and post introduction of an electronic result acknowledgement system and to determine the proportion of reports with abnormal results, including clinically significant abnormal results requiring follow-up action. Methods A before and after study was conducted in the emergency department of a 450-bed metropolitan teaching hospital in Australia. All radiology reports for discharged patients for a one-month period before and after implementation of the electronic result acknowledgement system were reviewed to determine; i) those that reported abnormal results; ii) evidence of test result acknowledgement. All unacknowledged radiology results with an abnormal finding were assessed by an independent panel of two senior emergency physicians for clinical significance. Results Of 1654 radiology reports in the pre-implementation period 70.6% ( n  = 1167) had documented evidence of acknowledgement by a clinician. For reports with abnormal results, 71.6% ( n  = 396) were acknowledged. Of 157 unacknowledged abnormal radiology reports reviewed by an independent emergency physician panel, 34.4% ( n  = 54) were identified as clinically significant and 50% of these ( n  = 27) were deemed to carry a moderate likelihood of patient morbidity if not followed up. Electronic acknowledgement occurred for all radiology reports in the post period ( n  = 1423), representing a 30.4% (95% CI: 28.1–32.6%) increase in acknowledgement rate, and an increase of 28.4% (95% CI: 24.6–32.2%) for abnormal radiology results. Conclusions The findings of this study demonstrate the potential of health information technology to improve the safety and effectiveness of the diagnostic process by increasing the rate of follow up of results pending at hospital discharge.

[1]  B. Miller,et al.  Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. , 2016, Military medicine.

[2]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Improving Test Result Follow-up through Electronic Health Records Requires More than Just an Alert , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[3]  Julie M. Fiskio,et al.  Research Paper: Improving Response to Critical Laboratory Results with Automation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial , 1999, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Research paper: Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  How promptly are inpatients treated for critical laboratory results? , 1998, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[6]  Simran Singh,et al.  Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[7]  A. Markowitz Fumbled Handoffs : One Dropped Ball after Another , 2005 .

[8]  Anuj K. Dalal,et al.  Lessons learned from implementation of a computerized application for pending tests at hospital discharge. , 2011, Journal of hospital medicine.

[9]  David W Bates,et al.  Can electronic clinical documentation help prevent diagnostic errors? , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[11]  David W. Bates,et al.  Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  M. Graber,et al.  Diagnostic errors in medicine: a case of neglect. , 2005, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[13]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Lessons learned from the introduction of an electronic safety net to enhance test result management in an Australian mothers’ hospital , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 1999, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[15]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  Failure to Follow-Up Test Results for Ambulatory Patients: A Systematic Review , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[17]  Hardeep Singh,et al.  Research Paper: Communication Outcomes of Critical Imaging Results in a Computerized Notification System , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Dean F Sittig,et al.  Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? , 2010, The American journal of medicine.

[19]  P. Maurette [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[20]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  B. Miller,et al.  Improving Diagnosis in Health Care , 2015 .

[22]  Lisa P. Newmark,et al.  Linking acknowledgement to action: closing the loop on non-urgent, clinically significant test results in the electronic health record , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  David W Bates,et al.  "I wish I had seen this test result earlier!": Dissatisfaction with test result management systems in primary care. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  Andrew Georgiou,et al.  The effect of computerized provider order entry systems on clinical care and work processes in emergency departments: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[25]  I Kohane,et al.  Potential impact of a computerized system to report late-arriving laboratory results in the emergency department , 2000, Pediatric emergency care.

[26]  Christopher L. Roy,et al.  Patient Safety Concerns Arising from Test Results That Return after Hospital Discharge , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  Scott,et al.  Computerized Alerts Improve Outpatient Laboratory Monitorin of Transplant Patients , 2008 .

[28]  D. Bates,et al.  Improving safety with information technology. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.