System Testing Evaluation for Enterprise Resource Planning to Reduce Failure Rate

Article history: Received: 26 November, 2016 Accepted: 23 December, 2016 Online: 28 January, 2017 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are widely used applications to manage resources, communication and data exchange between different departments and modules with the purpose of managing the overall business process of the organization using one integrated software system. Due to the large scale and the complexity nature of these systems, many ERP implementation projects have become failure. It is necessary to have a better test project management and test performance assessing system. To build a successful ERP system these processes are important. The purpose of the Test project management is verification and validation of the system. There was a separate stage to test the quality of software in the software development lifecycle and there is a separate independent Quality Assurance and testing team for a successful ERP development team. According to best practice testing principles it is necessary to, understand the requirements, test planning, test execution, identify and improve processes. Identify the necessary infrastructure; hardware and software are the major areas when developing test procedures. The aim of this survey is to identify ERP failures associated with the ERP projects, general and security within the Asian region, so that the parties responsible for the project can take necessary precautions to deal with those failures for a successful ERP implementation and bring down the ERP failure rate.

[1]  Gordon Fraser,et al.  The Seed is Strong: Seeding Strategies in Search-Based Software Testing , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation.

[2]  William E. Howden,et al.  Reliability of the Path Analysis Testing Strategy , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[3]  U. Sekaran,et al.  Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach (5th Edition) , 1992 .

[4]  Lionel C. Briand,et al.  Using Mutation Analysis for Assessing and Comparing Testing Coverage Criteria , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[5]  J. Paul Myers,et al.  The Path Prefix Software Testing Strategy , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[6]  Karuthan Chinna,et al.  Statistical analysis using SPSS , 2012 .

[7]  Victor R. Basili,et al.  Comparing the Effectiveness of Software Testing Strategies , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[8]  S. Lanka,et al.  Central Bank of Sri lanka , 2001 .

[9]  P. Gerrard Test Methods and Tools for ERP Implementations , 2007, Testing: Academic and Industrial Conference Practice and Research Techniques - MUTATION (TAICPART-MUTATION 2007).

[10]  Charles Rankin,et al.  The Software Testing Automation Framework , 2002, IBM Syst. J..

[11]  Sally Sieloff Magnan,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[12]  K.-C. Tai Condition-based software testing strategies , 1990, Proceedings., Fourteenth Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[13]  Urs Daellenbach,et al.  A contingency fit model of critical success factors for software development projects: A comparison of agile and traditional plan-based methodologies , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[14]  Dimitris Gizopoulos,et al.  Effective software-based self-test strategies for on-line periodic testing of embedded processors , 2004, Proceedings Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition.

[15]  Mario Jino,et al.  A Debugging Strategy Based on Requirements of Testin , 2003, CSMR.

[16]  Andrei Arusoaie,et al.  Automating Abstract Syntax Tree Construction for Context Free Grammars , 2012, 2012 14th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing.

[17]  Linda A. Suskie Questionnaire Survey Research: What Works , 1996 .

[18]  A. Jefferson Offutt,et al.  Constraint-Based Automatic Test Data Generation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[19]  Mahendra Muli,et al.  Taming complexity while gaining efficiency: Requirements for the next generation of test automation tools , 2013, 2013 IEEE AUTOTESTCON.

[20]  Robert Feldt,et al.  Automated System Testing Using Visual GUI Testing Tools: A Comparative Study in Industry , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation.

[21]  Hong Seong Park,et al.  Test Data Combination Strategy for Effective Test Suite Generation , 2013, 2013 International Conference on IT Convergence and Security (ICITCS).

[22]  William Lewis,et al.  Software Testing and Continuous Quality Improvement , 2000 .

[23]  R. Spital Automated Software Testing , 1983 .

[24]  D. Richard Kuhn,et al.  Software fault interactions and implications for software testing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[25]  Tsong Yueh Chen,et al.  Proportional sampling strategy: guidelines for software testing practitioners , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[26]  Kai-Yuan Cai,et al.  On the Asymptotic Behavior of Adaptive Testing Strategy for Software Reliability Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[27]  Geir Kjetil Hanssen,et al.  Automated Acceptance Testing: A Literature Review and an Industrial Case Study , 2008, Agile 2008 Conference.

[28]  Pankaj Mudholkar,et al.  Software Testing , 2002, Computer.

[29]  Katja Karhu,et al.  Empirical Observations on Software Testing Automation , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation.

[30]  Harold Davis Learn How to Program , 2004, Apress.