Does structural connectivity facilitate movement of native species in Australia’s fragmented landscapes?: a systematic review protocol

BackgroundHabitat fragmentation and accompanying isolation effects are among the biggest threats to global biodiversity. The goal of restoring connectivity to offset these threats has gained even greater urgency under the looming spectre of climate change. While linear corridors have been the most commonly proposed solution to these issues, it has become increasingly recognised that structural connectivity exists in different forms with a variety of characteristics. We previously conducted a systematic review from 2008-2010 to collate and synthesise evidence regarding the relationship between these different types of structural connectivity and the actual movement of native Australian plants and animals (i.e., functional connectivity). Our previous review produced a number of management recommendations but also identified significant knowledge gaps. Given that empirical research into connectivity has become even more common since the original review and that it has been more than five years since the original literature searches, the time is ripe for an update of that review.MethodsWe will update our previous systematic review by repeating a thorough search for both published and unpublished evidence on the effects of structural connectivity on animal and plant movement through heterogeneous landscapes. We will slightly broaden the scope of the original review by including data on semi-aquatic species as well as terrestrial ones. Studies will be included if they: 1) contain data on a terrestrial or semi-aquatic native Australian species; 2) have at least one study site that contains some form of structural connectivity between otherwise isolated patches of habitat; and 3) include data on movement of species through the connectivity or data that allow inference of movement (or the lack thereof). We will repeat the analyses carried out for the original review which used hierarchical linear modelling to assess the effects of numerous sources of heterogeneity (e.g., type of connectivity, width of connection, ecosystem type, taxonomic group, and many other characteristics of the species, habitat, and connectivity) on the amount of movement observed in a landscape. If increased sample sizes allow we will also carry out additional meta-analyses, which were not possible with the original dataset.

[1]  George R. Hess,et al.  Communicating clearly about conservation corridors , 2001 .

[2]  D. Saunders.  Changes in the Avifauna of a region, district and remnant as a result of fragmentation of native vegetation: the wheatbelt of western Australia. A case study , 1989 .

[3]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[4]  A. Bennett,et al.  Land use, habitat change and the conservation of birds in fragmented rural environments: a landscape perspective from the Northern Plains, Victoria, Australia , 1997 .

[5]  David S. Wilcove,et al.  Nest Predation in Forest Tracts and the Decline of Migratory Songbirds , 1985 .

[6]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF HABITAT FRAGMENTATION EFFECTS , 2002 .

[7]  C. Norwood.  Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in wildlife Conservation , 1999 .

[8]  P. Cale.  The spatial dynamics of White-browed Babbler groups in a fragmented agricultural landscape , 2002 .

[9]  J. Vielliard,et al.  Effects of structural and functional connectivity and patch size on the abundance of seven Atlantic Forest bird species , 2005 .

[10]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[11]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Nature Conservation 2: The Role of Corridors , 1993 .

[12]  R. Shaw,et al.  Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. , 2001, Science.

[13]  Cinda Davis,et al.  MOVEMENT RESPONSES TO PATCH STRUCTURE IN EXPERIMENTAL FRACTAL LANDSCAPES , 1999 .

[14]  R. Holt,et al.  A Survey and Overview of Habitat Fragmentation Experiments , 2000 .

[15]  T. Lovejoy.  Climate change and biodiversity. , 2008, Revue scientifique et technique.

[16]  Karin Frank,et al.  Integrating individual movement behaviour into dispersal functions. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Continua and Umwelt: novel perspectives on viewing landscapes , 2004 .

[18]  R. Hobbs.  The role of corridors in conservation: Solution or bandwagon? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  R. Hobbs,et al.  The role of conservation corridors in a changing climate , 1991 .

[20]  Sue McIntyre,et al.  Habitat Variegation, An Alternative to Fragmentation , 1992 .

[21]  V. Doerr,et al.  Does structural connectivity facilitate dispersal of native species in Australia’s fragmented terrestrial landscapes? , 2010 .

[22]  Marc P. Armstrong,et al.  Landscape fragmentation and dispersal in a model of riparian forest dynamics , 1990 .

[23]  Emilio M. Bruna,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and large‐scale conservation: what do we know for sure? , 1999 .

[24]  D. Dokken,et al.  Climate change and biodiversity. , 2002 .

[25]  A. U.S.,et al.  Movement Corridors : Conservation Bargains or Poor Investments ? , 2022 .

[26]  C. Parmesan.  Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change , 2006 .

[27]  P. Beier,et al.  Do Habitat Corridors Provide Connectivity? , 1998 .

[28]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  On Experimentation and the Study of Corridors: Response to Beier and Noss , 2000 .

[29]  R. Noss.  Corridors in Real Landscapes: A Reply to Simberloff and Cox , 1987 .

[30]  Robert A. Davis,et al.  Habitat Fragmentation and Landscape Change: An Ecological and Conservation Synthesis , 2006 .

[31]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Beyond fragmentation: the continuum model for fauna research and conservation in human‐modified landscapes , 2006 .

[32]  C. Catterall,et al.  The Use of Bushland, Corridors, and Linear Remnants by Birds in Southeastern Queensland, Australia , 1997 .

[33]  H. Recher.  The state of Australia's avifauna: a personal opinion and prediction for the new millennium , 1999 .

[34]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  A Framework for Conceptualizing Human Effects on Landscapes and Its Relevance to Management and Research Models , 1999 .

[35]  Julia Phillips,et al.  Nature Conservation 4: The Role of Networks , 1997 .

[36]  V. Doerr,et al.  Dispersal behaviour of Brown Treecreepers predicts functional connectivity for several other woodland birds , 2011 .

[37]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  CORRIDOR USE BY DIVERSE TAXA , 2003 .

[38]  A. Pullin,et al.  Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach , 2003 .

[39]  James A. Cox,et al.  Consequences and Costs of Conservation Corridors , 1987 .

[40]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .

[41]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Are hedgerows effective corridors between fragments of woodland habitat? An evidence-based approach , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  J. Rolstad.  Consequences of forest fragmentation for the dynamics of bird populations: conceptual issues and the evidence , 1991 .

[43]  Christian Wissel,et al.  Corridors as Conduits for Small Animals: Attainable Distances Depending on Movement Pattern, Boundary Reaction and Corridor Width , 1997 .

[44]  Greg Baxter,et al.  Corridor Ecology: The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation , 2007 .

[45]  A. Desrochers,et al.  Winter Responses of Forest Birds to Habitat Corridors and Gaps , 1998 .

[46]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Population dynamics in spatial habitats , 1997 .

[47]  Dennis D. Murphy,et al.  Conservation Strategy: The Effects of Fragmentation on Extinction , 1985, The American Naturalist.