Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection

Rural development in Europe is a long-standing issue that has been supported through EU policies in various ways. The effects of rural development have been uneven, and differences between well-to-do and marginal rural areas have been increasing both across and within countries. This process is reinforced by the current financial crisis. Recently, social innovation has been introduced as the new panacea for realising development and growth while, at the same time, warranting social inclusion and counteracting social inequality. A central question of this article is whether social innovation may help to effectively fight rural marginalisation, why that could be the case and what conditions then must be met. Three examples of rural social innovation are used to distil specific features of social innovation and compare them with other concepts and approaches to rural development. Rural social innovation is distinctive in its dependence on civic self-reliance and self-organisation due to austerity measures and state withdrawal, and its cross-sectoral and translocal collaborations. This article concludes that it is time to go beyond earlier ideas of exogenous versus (neo-)endogenous development and introduces the idea of nexogenous development with socio-political reconnection as an engine of revitalisation.

[1]  Claire Wallace,et al.  Building Virtual Bridges: How Rural Micro-Enterprises Develop Social Capital in Online and Face-to-Face Settings , 2016 .

[2]  R. Moruzzo,et al.  Transition Management and Social Innovation in Rural Areas: Lessons from Social Farming , 2014 .

[3]  T. Cresswell.  Towards a Politics of Mobility , 2010 .

[4]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  A working land: crofting communities, place and the politics of the possible in post-Land Reform Scotland1 , 2006 .

[5]  J. Mohan,et al.  Patterns of Social Capital, Voluntary Activity, and Area Deprivation in England , 2012 .

[6]  Bettina Bock,et al.  Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development , 2012 .

[7]  Sofia Wixe,et al.  What is Smart Rural Development , 2015 .

[8]  Meeting the challenge of marginalization processes at the periphery of Europe , 2010 .

[9]  M. Woods.  Rural development, globalization and European regional policy: Perspectives from the DERREG project , 2013 .

[10]  L. Glenna,et al.  Neoliberalism, the University, Public Goods and Agricultural Innovation , 2015 .

[11]  H. Urdal,et al.  An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities , 2013 .

[12]  J. Edelenbos,et al.  Burgercooperaties: Speler of speelbal in de nieuwe verhoudingen tussen overheid, markt en samenleving , 2015 .

[13]  M. Castells.  Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society , 2000 .

[14]  G. Bosworth,et al.  Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas , 2017 .

[15]  S. Goetz,et al.  Evaluating RD Policies for Social and Human Capital Development , 2010 .

[16]  C. Ray.  Neo-Endogenous Rural Development in the EU , 2006 .

[17]  S. Neumeier.  Why do Social Innovations in Rural Development Matter and Should They be Considered More Seriously in Rural Development Research? – Proposal for a Stronger Focus on Social Innovations in Rural Development Research , 2012 .

[18]  I. Horváth.  The Culture of Migration of Rural Romanian Youth , 2008 .

[19]  Mark Shucksmith,et al.  Disintegrated Rural Development? Neo‐endogenous Rural Development, Planning and Place‐Shaping in Diffused Power Contexts , 2010 .

[20]  G. Bosworth,et al.  Empowering Local Action through Neo‐Endogenous Development; The Case of LEADER in England , 2016 .

[21]  Mark Shucksmith,et al.  LEADER and Innovation , 2008 .

[22]  A. Mehmood,et al.  The International Handbook on Social Innovation , 2013 .

[23]  I. Terluin,et al.  Differences in economic development in rural regions of advanced countries: an overview and critical analysis of theories , 2003 .

[24]  Richard R. Shaker,et al.  The well-being of nations: an empirical assessment of sustainable urbanization for Europe , 2015 .