Spatial-variability-based algorithms for scaling-up spatial data and uncertainties

When using remote sensing and geographic information systems, accurately scaling- up spatial data of a variable and their uncertainties from a finer to a coarser spatial resolution is widely required in mapping and managing natural resources and ecological and environmental systems. In this study, four up-scaling methods were derived based on simple and ordinary cokriging estimators and a sequential Gaussian cosimulation algorithm for points and blocks. Taking spatial variability of variables into account in the up-scaling process made it possible to simultaneously and accurately obtain estimates and estimation variances of larger blocks from sample and image data of smaller supports. With the aid of Thematic Mapper imagery, these methods were compared in a case study where overall vegetation and tree covers were scaled up from a spatial resolution of 30/spl times/30 m/sup 2/ to 90/spl times/90 m/sup 2/ with a stratification method at 90/spl times/90 m/sup 2/. The results showed that the methods Point simple coKriging/spl I.bar/Point co-Simulation scaling UP (PsK/spl I.bar/PSUP) and PsK/spl I.bar/Block co-Simulation (PsK/spl I.bar/BS) led to smaller errors and better reproduced spatial distribution and variability of the variables than the other methods. Choosing PsK/spl I.bar/PSUP or PsK/spl I.bar/BS depends on the users' emphasis on accuracy of estimates and variances, computational time, etc. The methods can be applied to multiple continuous variables that have any distribution. It is also expected that the general idea behind the methods can be expanded to scaling-up spatial data for categorical variables.

[1]  C. Justice,et al.  Selecting the spatial resolution of satellite sensors required for global monitoring of land transformations , 1988 .

[2]  R. Olea.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation By Pierre Goovaerts, Oxford University Press, Applied Geostatistics Series, 1997, 483 p., hardcover, $65 (U.S.), ISBN 0-19-511538-4 , 1999 .

[3]  James R. Carr,et al.  Application of Spatial Statistics to Analyzing Multiple Remote Sensing Data Sets , 1988 .

[4]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  Spatial thresholds, image-objects, and upscaling: A multiscale evaluation , 1997 .

[5]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Scaling-up snow depth in the UK for comparison with SSM/I imagery , 1997 .

[6]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS , 2023 .

[7]  Baxter E. Vieux,et al.  DEM aggregation and smoothing effects on surface runoff modeling , 1993 .

[8]  M. Hodgson.  What Size Window for Image Classification? A Cognitive Perspective , 1998 .

[9]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Spatial uncertainty in prediction of the topographical factor for the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) , 2002 .

[10]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Appropriate Plot Size and Spatial Resolution for Mapping Multiple Vegetation Types , 2001 .

[11]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1998 .

[12]  Yvan Pannatier,et al.  Variowin: Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D , 1996 .

[13]  Lee De Cola,et al.  Multiresolution convariation among landsat and AVHRR vegetation indices , 1997 .

[14]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Mapping and uncertainty of predictions based on multiple primary variables from joint co-simulation with Landsat TM image and polynomial regression , 2002 .

[15]  G. Hay,et al.  A scale-space primer for exploring and quantifying complex landscapes , 2002 .

[16]  G. Hay,et al.  Remote Sensing Contributions to the Scale Issue , 1999 .

[17]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Spatial prediction and uncertainty assessment of topographic factor for revised universal soil loss equation using digital elevation models , 2001 .

[18]  D. Marceau.  The Scale Issue in the Social and Natural Sciences , 1999 .

[19]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Spatial Resolution For Remote Sensing Of Forest Plantations , 1988, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 'Remote Sensing: Moving Toward the 21st Century'..

[20]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[21]  Steven D. Warren,et al.  U.S. Army Land Condition-Trend Analysis (LCTA) Plot Inventory Field Methods , 1992 .

[22]  C. Woodcock,et al.  The factor of scale in remote sensing , 1987 .

[23]  Guangxing Wang,et al.  Improvement in mapping vegetation cover factor for the universal soil loss equation by geostatistical methods with Landsat Thematic Mapper images , 2002 .

[24]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Dealing with Scale in Landscape Analysis: An Overview , 2000, Ann. GIS.

[25]  Jian-guo Wu.  Hierarchy and scaling: Extrapolating informa-tion along a scaling ladder , 1999 .

[26]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science , 2001 .

[27]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  On the nature of models in remote sensing , 1986 .

[28]  David J. Tazik,et al.  US army land condition-trend analysis (LCTA) program , 1992 .

[29]  Guy Delrieu,et al.  Une Simplification du Cokrigeage Appliquee a L’etalonnage D’images de Teledetection en Hydrometeorologie , 1989 .

[30]  Paul G. Jarvis,et al.  Scaling processes and problems , 1995 .

[31]  J. Campbell.  Introduction to remote sensing , 1987 .

[32]  W. Tobler.  A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .