Implementation/optimization of moving least squares response surfaces for approximation of hurricane/storm surge and wave responses

One of the important recent advances in the field of hurricane/storm modelling has been the development of high-fidelity numerical simulation models for reliable and accurate prediction of wave and surge responses. The computational cost associated with these models has simultaneously created an incentive for researchers to investigate surrogate modelling (i.e. metamodeling) and interpolation/regression methodologies to efficiently approximate hurricane/storm responses exploiting existing databases of high-fidelity simulations. Moving least squares (MLS) response surfaces were recently proposed as such an approximation methodology, providing the ability to efficiently describe different responses of interest (such as surge and wave heights) in a large coastal region that may involve thousands of points for which the hurricane impact needs to be estimated. This paper discusses further implementation details and focuses on optimization characteristics of this surrogate modelling approach. The approximation of different response characteristics is considered, and special attention is given to predicting the storm surge for inland locations, for which the possibility of the location remaining dry needs to be additionally addressed. The optimal selection of the basis functions for the response surface and of the parameters of the MLS character of the approximation is discussed in detail, and the impact of the number of high-fidelity simulations informing the surrogate model is also investigated. Different normalizations of the response as well as choices for the objective function for the optimization problem are considered, and their impact on the accuracy of the resultant (under these choices) surrogate model is examined. Details for implementation of the methodology for efficient coastal risk assessment are reviewed, and the influence in the analysis of the model prediction error introduced through the surrogate modelling is discussed. A case study is provided, utilizing a recently developed database of high-fidelity simulations for the Hawaiian Islands.

[1]  J. Feyen,et al.  A Basin to Channel-Scale Unstructured Grid Hurricane Storm Surge Model Applied to Southern Louisiana , 2008 .

[2]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[3]  J. Westerink,et al.  Rapid Assessment of Wave and Surge Risk during Landfalling Hurricanes: Probabilistic Approach , 2013 .

[4]  Gabriel R. Toro,et al.  Approaches for the Efficient Probabilistic Calculation of Surge Hazard , 2007 .

[5]  D. Resio,et al.  Analysis of the coastal Mississippi storm surge hazard , 2010 .

[6]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Tropical cyclone inundation potential on the Hawaiian Islands of Oahu and Kauai , 2012 .

[7]  BreitkopfPiotr,et al.  Moving least squares response surface approximation , 2005 .

[8]  K. Nechvíle.  The High Resolution , 2005 .

[9]  J. C. Dietrich,et al.  Origin of the Hurricane Ike forerunner surge , 2011 .

[10]  R. H. Myers,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[11]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Stochastic subset optimization incorporating moving least squares response surface methodologies for stochastic sampling , 2012, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[12]  J. C. Dietrich,et al.  A High-Resolution Coupled Riverine Flow, Tide, Wind, Wind Wave, and Storm Surge Model for Southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part II: Synoptic Description and Analysis of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita , 2010 .

[13]  J. Westerink,et al.  Modeling the physics of storm surges , 2008 .

[14]  Andrew B. Kennedy,et al.  Observations of Landfalling Wave Spectra during Hurricane Ike , 2011 .

[15]  I. E. Udoh,et al.  Improvements in Hurricane Surge Response Functions: Incorporating the Effects of Forward Speed, Approach Angle, and Sea Level Rise , 2011 .

[16]  P. Villon,et al.  Moving least squares response surface approximation: Formulation and metal forming applications , 2005 .

[17]  R. D. Ward.  MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW. , 1907, Science.

[18]  Ren-Jye Yang,et al.  Moving Least Square Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2004 .

[19]  Robert W. Whalin,et al.  AN EFFICIENT STORM SURGE FORECASTING TOOL FOR COASTAL MISSISSIPPI , 2011 .

[20]  Ahsan Kareem,et al.  CYBER-EYE: Integrated Cyber-Infrastructure to Support Hurricane Risk- Assessment , 2012 .

[21]  Christopher W. Reed,et al.  Quadrature-based approach for the efficient evaluation of surge hazard , 2010 .

[22]  J. Irish,et al.  A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment. Part 2: Quantification of spatial attributes of response functions , 2009 .

[23]  D. Resio.  White paper on estimating hurricane inundation probabilities , 2007 .

[24]  Joannes J. Westerink,et al.  The effect of uncertainty on estimates of hurricane surge hazards , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[25]  G. Grimmett,et al.  Probability and random processes , 2002 .

[26]  Donald T. Resio,et al.  A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment – part 1: basic concepts , 2009 .

[27]  James L. Beck,et al.  Reliability-Based Design Using Two-Stage Stochastic Optimization with a Treatment of Model Prediction Errors , 2010 .

[28]  Christopher J. C. Burges,et al.  A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[29]  Youn Kyung Song,et al.  Regional attributes of hurricane surge response functions for hazard assessment , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[30]  A. Condon,et al.  Evaluation of coastal inundation hazard for present and future climates , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[31]  Christopher W. Reed,et al.  Efficient joint-probability methods for hurricane surge frequency analysis , 2010 .