International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement

PurposeTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is currently the international standard of care for treating degenerative and rheumatologic knee joint disease, as well as certain knee joint fractures. We sought to answer the following three research questions: (1) What is the international variance in primary and revision TKA rates around the world? (2) How do patient demographics (e.g., age, gender) vary internationally? (3) How have the rates of TKA utilization changed over time?MethodsThe survey included 18 countries with a total population of 755 million, and an estimated 1,324,000 annual primary and revision total knee procedures. Ten national inpatient databases were queried for this study from Canada, the United States, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Switzerland. Inpatient data were also compared with published registry data for eight countries with operating arthroplasty registers (Denmark, England & Wales, Norway, Romania, Scotland, Sweden, Australia, and New Zealand).ResultsThe average and median rate of primary and revision (combined) total knee replacement was 175 and 149 procedures/100,000 population, respectively, and ranged between 8.8 and 234 procedures/100,000 population. We observed that the procedure rate significantly increased over time for the countries in which historical data were available. The compound annual growth in the incidence of TKA ranged by country from 5.3% (France) to 17% (Portugal). We observed a nearly 27-fold range of TKA utilization rates between the 18 different countries included in the survey.ConclusionIt is apparent from the results of this study that the demand for TKA has risen substantially over the past decade in countries around the world.

[1]  Hirsch Hs Total joint replacement: a cost-effective procedure for the 1990s. , 1998 .

[2]  T. Scheerlinck,et al.  The use of primary total hip arthroplasty in university hospitals of the European Union. , 2004, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[3]  G. Verweij,et al.  Record linkage of hospital discharge register with population register: Experiences at Statistics Netherlands , 2004 .

[4]  Steven Kurtz,et al.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[5]  R. Bourne,et al.  Cost Effectiveness of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  O. Robertsson Knee arthroplasty registers. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  H. Sintonen,et al.  Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs , 2007, Acta orthopaedica.

[9]  N. Böhler,et al.  Comparison of the information in arthroplasty registers from different countries. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  Y. Zhang,et al.  The epidemiology of total knee replacement in South Korea: national registry data. , 2008, Rheumatology.

[11]  M. Miraldo,et al.  Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. , 2009, The Knee.

[12]  Steven M. Kurtz,et al.  SYMPOSIUM: ABJS CARL T. BRIGHTON WORKSHOP ON HEALTH POLICY ISSUES IN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY Future Young Patient Demand for Primary and Revision Joint Replacement , 2009 .

[13]  [Interregional mobility for total knee arthroplasty]. , 2009, Annali di igiene : medicina preventiva e di comunita.

[14]  M. Espallargues,et al.  Arthroplasty registers: A review of international experiences , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[15]  A David Paltiel,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[16]  H. Malchau,et al.  Why do we need a national joint replacement registry in the United States? , 2009, American journal of orthopedics.

[17]  F. Krummenauer,et al.  Clinical benefit and cost effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the older patient , 2009, European journal of medical research.

[18]  H. Horiguchi,et al.  Statistics for orthopedic surgery 2006–2007: data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[19]  A J Price,et al.  Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991 to 2006. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.