Seed vigor testing: an overview of the past, present and future perspective

The assessment of seed vigor has many important implications to the seed industry as a basic monitoring of seed physiological potential during different phases of seed production and a support for strategic decisions regarding the selection of high quality seedlots to meet the consumer demand. The potential attributes of seed vigor as a fundamental physiological seed characteristic and its association with field stand establishment and crop productivity has been worldwide recognized from the 1960s onward. This led to the diversification of research approaches involving the synchronization of different physiological characteristics and events that determine the potential for high performance during seed storage and after sowing. The basic objective of vigor testing is to provide a consistent identification of differences in physiological potential among seedlots of commercial value and this represents a more sensitive parameter than the germination test. There are various procedures to assess seed vigor including those that directly or indirectly evaluate seed metabolic state or identify seed tolerance to specific stress(es). At the same time, in more recent years, new knowledge has come from molecular biology, biotechnology, biophysics and seed and seedling imaging analyses; these approaches has been important complements to traditional seed research.. This text has the purpose to emphasize the role of Brazilian research in seed vigor, whose competence is internationally recognized, and to provide an overview of the evolution of knowledge also attempting to highlight events that contributed to the advancement of research on the subject.

[1]  R. P. Moore.,et al.  Tetrazolium Test for Predicting Cold Test Performance of Seed Corn1 , 1965 .

[2]  S. Matthews,et al.  Length of the lag period of germination and metabolic repair explain vigour differences in seed lots of maize (Zea mays) , 2007 .

[3]  G. P. Cheplick,et al.  Seed Aging: Implications for Seed Storage and Persistence in the Soil. , 1986 .

[4]  D. M. Tekrony,et al.  The bulk conductivity test as an indicator of soybean seed quality , 1988 .

[5]  M. S. Howarth,et al.  Measurement of Seedling Growth Rate by Machine Vision , 1993 .

[6]  I. Poulsen,et al.  Effects of seed vigour and dormancy on field emergence, development and grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) , 1993 .

[7]  S. Matthews,et al.  Evaluation of seed quality: from physiology to international standardization , 2011, Seed Science Research.

[8]  J. Delouche,et al.  DETERIORATION OF SEED CORN DURING STORAGE1 , 1973 .

[9]  C. S. Cooper,et al.  Germination, Growth, and Respieration Rates of Birdsfoot Trefoil at Three Temperatures During the Early Non-Photosynthetic Stage of Development 1 , 1968 .

[10]  H. Shekar Shetty,et al.  Membrane deterioration and other biochemical changes, associated with accelerated ageing of maize seeds , 1991 .

[11]  S. Matthews.  Physiology of seed ageing , 1985 .

[12]  M. Mcdonald,et al.  lipid peroxidation model of seed ageing , 1986 .

[13]  E. E. Roos,et al.  6 – SEED AND SEEDLING VIGOR , 1972 .

[14]  J. R. Holbert,et al.  3. The Influence of Temperature upon the Metabolism and Expression of Disease Resistance in Selfed Lines of Corn 1 , 1926 .

[15]  C. C. Baskin,et al.  Accelerated Aging Techniques for Predicting the Relative Storability of Seed Lots , 1973 .

[16]  M. S. Zuber,et al.  Germination of Maize under Adverse Conditions 1 , 1943 .

[17]  S. M. Cícero,et al.  Análise de imagens de plântulas para avaliação do potencial fisiológico de sementes de berinjela , 2014 .

[18]  S. R. Draper,et al.  Automated vigour testing of field vegetables using image analysis. , 1990 .

[19]  H. Lutz.  Seeding and Planting in the Practice of Forestry , 2022 .

[20]  J. Vázquez-Ramos,et al.  Seed deterioration and respiration as related to DNA metabolism in germinating maize , 1995 .

[21]  James D. Maguire,et al.  Speed of Germination—Aid In Selection And Evaluation for Seedling Emergence And Vigor1 , 1962 .

[22]  E. L. Pinnell.  Genetic and Environmental Factors Affecting Corn Seed Germination At Low Temperatures 1 , 1949 .

[23]  Rob Van Der Schoor,et al.  Use of chlrophyll fluorescence sorting to improve soybean seed quality , 2009 .

[24]  J. M. Filho,et al.  Procedures for evaluation of soybean seed vigor, including an automated computer imaging system , 2009 .

[25]  H. W. Alberts.  Effect of Pericarp Injury on Moisture Absorption, Fungus Attack, and Vitality of Corn 1 , 1927 .

[26]  J. Marcos-Filho,et al.  SEED PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT CORN GENOTYES DURING STORAGE , 2013 .

[27]  S. M. Cicero,et al.  Image seedling analysis to evaluate tomato seed physiological potential , 2014 .

[28]  Julio Marcos-Filho,et al.  DESEMPENHO DE SEMENTES DE DIFERENTES GENÓTIPOS DE MILHO DURANTE O ARMAZENAMENTO , 2013 .

[29]  L. Copeland,et al.  Seed Vigor and Vigor Tests , 1999 .

[30]  Z. Jianhua,et al.  The saturated salt accelerated aging test for small-seeded crops , 1997 .

[31]  J. M. Filho,et al.  ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF THE COLD TEST FOR EVALUATION OF CORN SEED VIGOR , 2022 .

[32]  M. Mcdonald,et al.  Assessment of melon seed vigour by an automated computer imaging system compared to traditional procedures , 2006 .

[33]  J. Delouche,et al.  Some Indices of Vigor and Deterioration in Seed of Crimson Clover , 1962 .

[34]  F. Corbineau.  Markers of seed quality: from present to future , 2012, Seed Science Research.

[35]  T. Ching,et al.  Physiological and Chemical Differences in Aged Seeds 1 , 1968 .

[36]  A. Dell'Aquila,et al.  Development of novel techniques in conditioning, testing and sorting seed physiological quality. , 2009 .

[37]  J. F. Groves,et al.  A Method of Prophesying the Life Duration of Seeds. , 1915, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  S. Sen-Mandi,et al.  Some physiological differences between naturally and artificially aged wheat seeds. , 1990 .

[39]  J. Hampton,et al.  The controlled deterioration test induces dormancy in swede (Brassica napus var. naprobrassica) seed , 1999 .

[40]  J. E. Menezes,et al.  Bibliography of Brazilian seeds. , 1980 .

[41]  K. Fujimura,et al.  An automated system for vigor testing three-day-old soybean seedlings , 2003 .

[42]  F. A. G. Junior,et al.  Assessment of physiological potential of cucumber seeds using the software Seedling Vigor Imaging System® (SVIS®) , 2012 .

[43]  K. Fujimura,et al.  A system for automated seed vigour assessment , 2001 .

[44]  M. Mcdonald.  Seed deterioration: Physiology, repair and assessment , 1999 .

[45]  D. M. Tekrony.  Precision is an essential component in seed vigour testing , 2003 .

[46]  J. Delouche,et al.  Deterioration of soybean seed in storage , 1971 .

[47]  F. C. Krzyzanowski,et al.  The tetrazolium test for soybean seeds. , 1998 .