Ontogeny of Performance in Vertebrates*

When competing for food or other resources, or when confronted with predators, young animals may be at a disadvantage relative to adults because of their smaller size. Additionally, the ongoing differentiation and growth of tissues and the development of sensory‐motor integration during early ontogeny may constrain performance. Because ectothermic vertebrates show different growth regimes and energetic requirements when compared to endothermic vertebrates, differences in the ontogenetic trajectories of performance traits in these two groups might be expected. However, both groups of vertebrates show similar patterns of changes in performance with ontogeny. Evidence for compensation, resulting in relatively high levels of performance in juveniles relative to adults, appears common for traits related to locomotor and defensive behaviors. However, there is little evidence for compensation in traits associated with feeding and foraging. We suggest that this difference may be due to different selective regimes operating on locomotor versus feeding traits. As a result, relatively high levels of locomotor performance in juveniles and relatively high levels of feeding performance in adults are observed across a wide range of vertebrate groups.

[1]  Brook O. Swanson,et al.  Development of the Escape Response in Teleost Fishes: Do Ontogenetic Changes Enable Improved Performance?* , 2005, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[2]  S. Emerson ALLOMETRY AND JUMPING IN FROGS: HELPING THE TWAIN TO MEET , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  B. Valkenburgh,et al.  Development of bite strength and feeding behaviour in juvenile spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) , 2000 .

[4]  R. Marsh Ontogenesis of contractile properties of skeletal muscle and sprint performance in the lizard Dipsosaurus dorsalis. , 1988, The Journal of experimental biology.

[5]  B. Lister Seasonal Niche Relationships of Rain Forest Anoles , 1981 .

[6]  Kurt Schwenk,et al.  Feeding : form, function, and evolution in tetrapod vertebrates , 2000 .

[7]  P W Webb,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  A. Herrel,et al.  Relationships between head size, bite force, prey handling efficiency and diet in two sympatric lacertid lizards , 2002 .

[9]  S. Tanaka Suction Feeding by the Nurse Shark , 1973 .

[10]  E. Werner,et al.  THE ONTOGENETIC NICHE AND SPECIES INTERACTIONS IN SIZE-STRUCTURED POPULATIONS , 1984 .

[11]  P. Motta,et al.  Patterns of growth and the effects of scale on the feeding kinematics of the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) , 2006 .

[12]  A. Biewener Future directions for the analysis of musculoskeletal design and locomotor performance , 2002, Journal of morphology.

[13]  A. Herrel,et al.  Scaling of morphology, bite force, and feeding kinematics in an iguanian and a sclerosglossan lizard , 2002 .

[14]  Johnston,et al.  The biomechanics of fast-starts during ontogeny in the common carp cyprinus carpio , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  R. German,et al.  Ontogeny of feeding function in the gray short-tailed opossum Monodelphis domestica: empirical support for the constrained model of jaw biomechanics , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  J. Grubich Morphological convergence of pharyngeal jaw structure in durophagous perciform fish , 2003 .

[17]  A. Gibb,et al.  Do Endangered Razorback Suckers Have Poor Larval Escape Performance Relative to Introduced Rainbow Trout , 2003 .

[18]  Domenici,et al.  The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  R. S. Wilson,et al.  Allometric scaling relationships of jumping performance in the striped marsh frog Limnodynastes peronii. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  A. Herrel,et al.  A biomechanical analysis of intra- and interspecific scaling of jumping and morphology in Caribbean Anolis lizards , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  Kurt Schwenk,et al.  CHAPTER 8 – Feeding in Lepidosaurs , 2000 .

[22]  R. Drenner,et al.  Maximum Prey Size of an Insectivorous Lizard, Sceloporus undulatus garmani , 1985 .

[23]  D. Irschick,et al.  Ontogenetic Differences in Morphology, Habitat Use, Behavior, and Sprinting Capacity in Two West Indian Anolis Lizards , 2000 .

[24]  Cole,et al.  Scaling of intrinsic contractile properties and myofibrillar protein composition of fast muscle in the fish myoxocephalus scorpius L , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  T. Garland,et al.  Integrating function and ecology in studies of adaptation: Investigations of locomotor capacity as a model system , 2001 .

[26]  A. Herrel,et al.  Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin's finches: implications for the evolution of beak shape , 2005 .

[27]  F. H. Pough,et al.  Prey-handling and the evolutionary ecology of sand-swimming lizards (Lerista : Scincidae) , 1997, Oecologia.

[28]  D. Irschick,et al.  Age‐Specific Forced Polymorphism: Implications of Ontogenetic Changes in Morphology for Male Mating Tactics* , 2005, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[29]  A. Herrel,et al.  Ontogenetic Scaling of Bite Force in Lizards and Turtles* , 2005, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[30]  Michael E. Newlin,et al.  Age-Specific Shift in the Diet of the Crevice Spiny Lizard, Sceloporus poinsetti in Southwestern New Mexico , 1977 .

[31]  S. Herring,et al.  Length-tension relationships of masseter and digastric muscles of miniature swine during ontogeny. , 1989, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[32]  F. Trillmich,et al.  Ontogeny of running performance in the wild guinea pig (Cavia aperea) , 2003 .

[33]  J. Hjelm,et al.  Functional link between foraging performance, functional morphology, and diet shift in roach (Rutilus rutilus) , 2003 .

[34]  R. James,et al.  Scaling effects on muscle function in fast and slow muscles of Xenopus laevis , 1996 .

[35]  V. Der,et al.  A tough nut to crack. Adaptations to seed cracking in finches. , 2004 .

[36]  B. R. Moon,et al.  The Ontogeny of Contractile Performance and Metabolic Capacity in a High‐Frequency Muscle* , 2005, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[37]  Michael LaBarbera,et al.  ANALYZING BODY SIZE AS A FACTOR IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION , 1989 .

[38]  Webb Pw,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976 .

[39]  K. Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Scaling, why is animal size so important? , 1984 .

[40]  E. Azizi,et al.  Effects of metamorphosis on the aquatic escape response of the two-lined salamander (Eurycea bislineata). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[41]  Peter Aerts,et al.  THE KINEMATICS OF VOLUNTARY STEADY SWIMMING OF HATCHLING AND ADULT AXOLOTLS (AMBYSTOMA MEXICANUM SHAW, 1789) , 1999 .

[42]  P. Aerts,et al.  Scaling of Suction Feeding Performance in the Catfish Clarias gariepinus* , 2005, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[43]  D. Irschick Effects of behaviour and ontogeny on the locomotor performance of a West Indian lizard, Anolis lineatopus , 2000 .

[44]  A. Lappin,et al.  The ontogeny of bite-force performance in American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) , 2003 .

[45]  J. Hjelm,et al.  Growth, morphological variation and ontogenetic niche shifts in perch (Perca fluviatilis) in relation to resource availability , 2000, Oecologia.

[46]  A. F. Bennett,et al.  Scaling of speed and endurance in garter snakes: a comparison of cross‐sectional and longitudinal allometries , 1990 .

[47]  L. Hernandez,et al.  Intraspecific scaling of feeding mechanics in an ontogenetic series of zebrafish, Danio rerio. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[48]  Anthony Herrel,et al.  Sexual dimorphism of head size in Gallotia galloti: testing the niche divergence hypothesis by functional analyses , 1999 .

[49]  A. Keast,et al.  The effect of prey morphology and size on handling time in a piscivore, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) , 1987 .

[50]  L C Rome,et al.  Maximum velocity of shortening of three fibre types from horse soleus muscle: implications for scaling with body size. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[51]  M. Paulissen Optimal foraging and intraspecific diet differences in the lizard Cnemidophorus sexlineatus , 1987, Oecologia.

[52]  Hale,et al.  Locomotor mechanics during early life history: effects of size and ontogeny on fast-start performance of salmonid fishes , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[53]  P. Wainwright,et al.  Scaling the feeding mechanism of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides): kinematics of prey capture , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[54]  R. Blake,et al.  The effect of size on the kinematics and performance of angelfish (Pterophyllum eimekei) escape responses , 1993 .

[55]  R. Svanbäck,et al.  Effects of habitat and food resources on morphology and ontogenetic growth trajectories in perch , 2002, Oecologia.

[56]  T. Schoener The Anolis Lizards of Bimini: Resource Partitioning in a Complex Fauna , 1968 .

[57]  N. Curtin,et al.  Power Output and Force-velocity Relationship of Live Fibres from White Myotomal Muscle of the Dogfish, Scyliorhinus Canicula , 2022 .

[58]  Andrew A Biewener,et al.  In Vivo Bone Strain and Ontogenetic Growth Patterns in Relation to Life‐History Strategies and Performance in Two Vertebrate Taxa: Goats and Emu* , 2005, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[59]  James Scaling of muscle performance during escape responses in the fish myoxocephalus scorpius L , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[60]  P. Motta,et al.  Trophic consequences of differential performance: ontogeny of oral jaw‐crushing performance in the sheepshead, Archosargus probatocephalus (Teleostei, Sparidae) , 1997 .

[61]  R E Ricklefs,et al.  ADAPTATION, CONSTRAINT, AND COMPROMISE IN AVIAN POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT , 1979, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[62]  D. Carrier,et al.  Skeletal growth and function in the California gull (Larus californicus) , 1990 .