Ultrafiltration and backfiltration during hemodialysis.

Ultrafiltration is the pressure-driven process by which hemodialysis removes excess fluid from renal failure patients. Despite substantial improvements in hemodialysis technology, three significant problems related to ultrafiltration remain: ultrafiltration volume control, ultrafiltration rate control, and backfiltration. Ultrafiltration volume control is complicated by the effects of plasma protein adsorption, hematocrit, and coagulation parameters on membrane performance. Furthermore, previously developed equations relating the ultrafiltration rate and the transmembrane pressure are not applicable to high-flux dialyzers, high blood flow rates, and erythropoietin therapy. Regulation of the ultrafiltration rate to avoid hypotension, cramps and other intradialytic complications is complicated by inaccurate estimates of dry weight and patient-to-patient differences in vascular refilling rates. Continuous monitoring of circulating blood volume during hemodialysis may enable a better understanding of the role of blood volume in triggering intradialytic symptoms and allow determination of optimal ultrafiltration rate profiles for hemodialysis. Backfiltration can occur as a direct result of ultrafiltration control and results in transport of bacterial products from dialysate to blood. By examining these problems from an engineering perspective, the authors hope to clarify what can and cannot be prevented by understanding and manipulating the fluid dynamics of ultrafiltration.

[1]  B. Zweifach Mechanisms of Blood Flow and Fluid Exchange in Microvessels: Hemorrhagic Hypotension Model , 1974, Anesthesiology.

[2]  B. Canaud,et al.  Sterile and pyrogen-free bicarbonate dialysate: a necessity for hemodialysis today. , 1990, Advances in nephrology from the Necker Hospital.

[3]  C. Holmes,et al.  In vitro study of the transfer of cytokine-inducing substances across selected high-flux hemodialysis membranes. , 1991, Blood purification.

[4]  J. Floege,et al.  Detection of endotoxin-like interleukin-1-inducing activity during in vitro dialysis. , 1988, Kidney international.

[5]  P. Weidmann,et al.  Plasma levels and dialysance of atrial natriuretic peptide in terminal renal failure. , 1987, Kidney international.

[6]  T. Kenner,et al.  Nature and rate of vascular refilling during hemodialysis and ultrafiltration. , 1992, Kidney international.

[7]  C. G. Olthof,et al.  Assessment of post-dialysis dry weight: an application of the conductivity measurement method. , 1992, Kidney international.

[8]  C. G. Olthof,et al.  Continuous measurement of blood volume during hemodialysis by an optical method. , 1992, ASAIO journal.

[9]  J. Cavaillon,et al.  In vivo induction of interleukin-1 during hemodialysis. , 1989, Kidney international.

[10]  R D Swartz,et al.  Preservation of plasma volume during hemodialysis depends on dialysate osmolality. , 1982, American journal of nephrology.

[11]  J. Petersen,et al.  An in vivo analysis of reverse ultrafiltration during high-flux and high-efficiency dialysis. , 1992, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[12]  J. Leypoldt,et al.  Measurement of backfiltration rates during hemodialysis with highly permeable membranes. , 1991, Blood purification.

[13]  E. Starling On the Absorption of Fluids from the Connective Tissue Spaces , 1896, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. Horina,et al.  A blood protein monitor for the continuous measurement of blood volume changes during hemodialysis. , 1990, Kidney international.

[15]  P. Keshaviah,et al.  A simulation study on transcellular fluid shifts induced by hemodialysis. , 1983, Kidney international.

[16]  G Kimura,et al.  Model prediction of plasma volume change induced by hemodialysis. , 1984, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[17]  J. Vienken,et al.  Bacteria- and endotoxin-free dialysis fluid for use in chronic hemodialysis. , 1994, Artificial organs.

[18]  H. Goehl,et al.  Sterile versus non-sterile dialysis fluid in chronic hemodialysis treatment. , 1990, ASAIO Transactions.

[19]  J. V. van Stone,et al.  The effect of dialysate sodium concentration on body fluid distribution during hemodialysis. , 1980, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[20]  R. Gerzer,et al.  The postdialytic plasma cyclic guanosine 3':5'-monophosphate level as a measure of fluid overload in chronic hemodialysis. , 1992, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[21]  R. Gerzer,et al.  Assessment of dry body-weight in haemodialysis patients by the biochemical marker cGMP. , 1990, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[22]  H. Mann,et al.  Backfiltration in hemodialysis with highly permeable membranes. , 1985, Contributions to nephrology.

[23]  T. Pallone,et al.  A model of the volumetrically-controlled hemodialysis circuit. , 1992, Kidney international.

[24]  C. Ronco,et al.  A new scintigraphic method to characterize ultrafiltration in hollow fiber dialyzers. , 1992, Kidney international.

[25]  M. Neff,et al.  Blood volume changes and hypotension during hemodialysis. , 1970, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[26]  G. Lonnemann,et al.  The effect of ultrafiltered dialysate on the cellular content of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist in patients on chronic hemodialysis. , 1994, Nephron.

[27]  U. Schallenberg,et al.  A new method of continuous haemoglobinometric measurement of blood volume during haemodialysis. , 1987, Life support systems : the journal of the European Society for Artificial Organs.

[28]  E. Klein,et al.  Microbial and endotoxin contamination in water and dialysate in the central United States. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[29]  E. J. Mees,et al.  Plasma volume recovery after ultrafiltration in patients with chronic renal failure. , 1984, Kidney international.

[30]  R. Converse,et al.  Paradoxical withdrawal of reflex vasoconstriction as a cause of hemodialysis-induced hypotension. , 1992, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[31]  R. Raja,et al.  Plasma refilling during hemodialysis with decreasing ultrafiltration. Influence of dialysate sodium. , 1994, ASAIO journal.

[32]  S. McAllister,et al.  A prospective study of pyrogenic reactions in hemodialysis patients using bicarbonate dialysis fluids filtered to remove bacteria and endotoxin. , 1992, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[33]  J. Rouby,et al.  Importance of the plasma refilling rate in the genesis of hypovolaemic hypotension during regular dialysis and controlled sequential ultrafiltration-haemodialysis. , 1978, Proceedings of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association. European Dialysis and Transplant Association.

[34]  M. Lysaght,et al.  Determinants of Fluid and Solute Removal Rates During Hemofiltration , 1986 .

[35]  A. Michael,et al.  Endotoxemia in febrile reactions during hemodialysis. , 1973, Kidney international.

[36]  J. Leypoldt,et al.  Critical Analysis of Formulas for Estimating Backfiltration in Hemodialysis , 1992 .

[37]  M Spongano,et al.  Continuous on-line optical absorbance recording of blood volume changes during hemodialysis. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[38]  M. Kray,et al.  Effect of high hematocrit and high blood flow rates on transmembrane pressure and ultrafiltration rate in hemodialysis. , 1991, Blood purification.

[39]  C. Dinarello Cytokines: agents provocateurs in hemodialysis? , 1992, Kidney international.

[40]  M. Kazatchkine,et al.  Induction of IL-1 during hemodialysis: transmembrane passage of intact endotoxins (LPS). , 1990, Kidney international.

[41]  G. Lonnemann,et al.  Permeability of dialyzer membranes to TNFα-inducing substances derived from water bacteria , 1992 .

[42]  L. Henderson Symptomatic hypotension during hemodialysis. , 1980, Kidney international.

[43]  Y. Berland,et al.  Using Ultrapure Water in Hemodialysis Delays Carpal Tunnel Syndrome , 1991, The International journal of artificial organs.

[44]  L. Henderson,et al.  Successful production of sterile pyrogen-free electrolyte solution by ultrafiltration. , 1978, Kidney international.

[45]  A. Zydney,et al.  Diffusive and convective solute transport through hemodialysis membranes: a hydrodynamic analysis. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[46]  B. Descamps-Latscha,et al.  Permeability of cellulosic and non-cellulosic membranes to endotoxin subunits and cytokine production during in-vitro haemodialysis. , 1992, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[47]  Robert R. Steuer,et al.  A new optical technique for monitoring hematocrit and circulating blood volume: its application in renal dialysis , 1993 .

[48]  C. G. Olthof,et al.  Assessment of postdialysis dry weight: a comparison of techniques. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[49]  H J Gurland,et al.  Net ultrafiltration may not eliminate backfiltration during hemodialysis with highly permeable membranes. , 1991, Artificial organs.

[50]  B. Canaud,et al.  Clinical and microbiological evaluation of a postdilutional hemofiltration system with in-line production of substitution fluid. , 1990, Blood purification.

[51]  K. Sakai,et al.  An improvement on the method of determining the solute permeability of hollow-fiber dialysis membranes photometrically using optical fibers and comparison of the method with ordinary techniques , 1994 .

[52]  J T Daugirdas,et al.  Dialysis hypotension: a hemodynamic analysis. , 1991, Kidney international.

[53]  S. McAllister,et al.  Pyrogenic reactions in patients receiving conventional, high-efficiency, or high-flux hemodialysis treatments with bicarbonate dialysate containing high concentrations of bacteria and endotoxin. , 1992, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[54]  E. Ritz,et al.  No evidence for endotoxin transfer across high flux polysulfone membranes. , 1987, Clinical nephrology.