Comparison of dual-energy subtraction and electronic bone suppression combined with computer-aided detection on chest radiographs: effect on human observers' performance in nodule detection.

OBJECTIVE The objective of our study was to compare the effect of dual-energy subtraction and bone suppression software alone and in combination with computer-aided detection (CAD) on the performance of human observers in lung nodule detection. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred one patients with from one to five lung nodules measuring 5-29 mm and 42 subjects with no nodules were retrospectively selected and randomized. Three independent radiologists marked suspicious-appearing lesions on the original chest radiographs, dual-energy subtraction images, and bone-suppressed images before and after postprocessing with CAD. Marks of the observers and CAD marks were compared with CT as the reference standard. Data were analyzed using nonparametric tests and the jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) method. RESULTS Using dual-energy subtraction alone (p = 0.0198) or CAD alone (p = 0.0095) improved the detection rate compared with using the original conventional chest radiograph. The combination of bone suppression and CAD provided the highest sensitivity (51.6%) and the original nonenhanced conventional chest radiograph alone provided the lowest (46.9%; p = 0.0049). Dual-energy subtraction and bone suppression provided the same false-positive (p = 0.2702) and true-positive (p = 0.8451) rates. Up to 22.9% of lesions were found only by the CAD program and were missed by the readers. JAFROC showed no difference in the performance between modalities (p = 0.2742-0.5442). CONCLUSION Dual-energy subtraction and the electronic bone suppression program used in this study provided similar detection rates for pulmonary nodules. Additionally, CAD alone or combined with bone suppression can significantly improve the sensitivity of human observers for pulmonary nodule detection.

[1]  Catherine Beigelman-Aubry,et al.  Management of an incidentally discovered pulmonary nodule , 2007, European Radiology.

[2]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 2004, Radiology.

[3]  Edith M Marom,et al.  Update in the evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  D. Chakraborty,et al.  Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. , 1990, Radiology.

[5]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  S Maryland,et al.  Small lung cancers:improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging——comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography , 2012 .

[7]  Edith M Marom,et al.  Lung cancer imaging. , 2014, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[8]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. , 1999, Chest.

[9]  K. Doi,et al.  Lung cancers missed on chest radiographs: results obtained with a commercial computer-aided detection program. , 2008, Radiology.

[10]  Elmar Kotter,et al.  Comparison of Radiologist and CAD Performance in the Detection of CT-confirmed Subtle Pulmonary Nodules on Digital Chest Radiographs , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[11]  J W Oestmann,et al.  "Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Shih-Chung Benedict Lo,et al.  Lung nodules: improved detection with software that suppresses the rib and clavicle on chest radiographs. , 2011, Radiology.

[13]  Peter Vock,et al.  Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: Detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice , 2007, European Radiology.

[14]  Hiroaki Sugiura,et al.  Fast Scanning Tomosynthesis for the Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: Diagnostic Performance Compared With Chest Radiography, Using Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography as the Reference , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[15]  Shandra Bipat,et al.  Computer-aided detection of small pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs: an observer study. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[16]  D. P. Chakraborty,et al.  A status report on free-response analysis. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[17]  E. Samei,et al.  Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. , 2007, Medical physics.

[18]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  J T Ho,et al.  Comparison of dual-energy and conventional chest radiography for nodule detection. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[20]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-aided detection improves detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs beyond the support by bone-suppressed images. , 2014, Radiology.

[21]  O. Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: suspiciousness of nodules according to size on baseline scans. , 2004, Radiology.

[22]  K. Doi,et al.  Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. , 1996, Radiology.

[23]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Computer-aided Detection of Lung Cancer on Chest Radiographs: Effect on Observer Performance , 2012 .

[24]  Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement From the Fleischner Society , 2007 .

[25]  L T Niklason,et al.  Calcification in pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital radiography. , 1986, Radiology.

[26]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Recent advances in chest radiography. , 2006, Radiology.

[27]  J. Estroff,et al.  Ultrasound and MRI of fetuses with ventriculomegaly: can cortical development be used to predict postnatal outcome? , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Frank Fischbach,et al.  Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  Robert C Gilkeson,et al.  Dual Energy Subtraction Digital Radiography Improves Performance of a Next Generation Computer-aided Detection Program , 2010, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[30]  T Kozuka,et al.  Clinical evaluation of pulmonary nodules with single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography with an iterative noise-reduction algorithm. , 1995, Radiology.

[31]  Peter Vock,et al.  Improved detection of pulmonary nodules on energy-subtracted chest radiographs with a commercial computer-aided diagnosis software: comparison with human observers , 2009, European Radiology.

[32]  J. Austin,et al.  Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. , 2005, Radiology.

[33]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[34]  Frank Fischbach,et al.  Clinical results of CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography , 2003, European Radiology.