Demography and Genetic Structure of a Recovering Grizzly Bear Population

Abstract Grizzly bears (brown bears; Ursus arctos) are imperiled in the southern extent of their range worldwide. The threatened population in northwestern Montana, USA, has been managed for recovery since 1975; yet, no rigorous data were available to monitor program success. We used data from a large noninvasive genetic sampling effort conducted in 2004 and 33 years of physical captures to assess abundance, distribution, and genetic health of this population. We combined data from our 3 sampling methods (hair trap, bear rub, and physical capture) to construct individual bear encounter histories for use in Huggins–Pledger closed mark–recapture models. Our population estimate, N̂ = 765 (95% CI = 715–831) was more than double the existing estimate derived from sightings of females with young. Based on our results, the estimated known, human-caused mortality rate in 2004 was 4.6% (95% CI = 4.2–4.9%), slightly above the 4% considered sustainable; however, the high proportion of female mortalities raises concern. We used location data from telemetry, confirmed sightings, and genetic sampling to estimate occupied habitat. We found that grizzly bears occupied 33,480 km2 in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem (NCDE) during 1994–2007, including 10,340 km2 beyond the Recovery Zone. We used factorial correspondence analysis to identify potential barriers to gene flow within this population. Our results suggested that genetic interchange recently increased in areas with low gene flow in the past; however, we also detected evidence of incipient fragmentation across the major transportation corridor in this ecosystem. Our results suggest that the NCDE population is faring better than previously thought, and they highlight the need for a more rigorous monitoring program.

[1]  David A. Roon,et al.  Grizzly Bear Density in Glacier National Park, Montana , 2008 .

[2]  K. Aubry,et al.  Using Anecdotal Occurrence Data for Rare or Elusive Species: The Illusion of Reality and a Call for Evidentiary Standards , 2008 .

[3]  David A. Roon,et al.  Multiple data sources improve DNA-based mark-recapture population estimates of grizzly bears. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Use of Occupancy Models to Estimate the Influence of Previous Live Captures on DNA-Based Detection Probabilities of Grizzly Bears , 2008 .

[5]  R. Abbott Pierre Taberlet — Recipient of 2007 Molecular Ecology Prize , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[6]  Brian P. Dreher,et al.  Noninvasive Estimation of Black Bear Abundance Incorporating Genotyping Errors and Harvested Bear , 2007 .

[7]  A META-ANALYSIS OF GRIZZLY BEAR DNA MARK-RECAPTURE PROJECTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA , CANADA INVITED , 2007 .

[8]  Michael K. Phillips,et al.  The Normative Dimension and Legal Meaning of Endangered and Recovery in the U.S. Endangered Species Act , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  A. Meyer,et al.  Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish , 2006, Nature.

[10]  G. White,et al.  Temporal, Spatial, and Environmental Influences on the Demographics of Grizzly Bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem , 2006 .

[11]  M. Proctor,et al.  Genetic analysis reveals demographic fragmentation of grizzly bears yielding vulnerably small populations , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  P. Lukacs,et al.  Review of capture–recapture methods applicable to noninvasive genetic sampling , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[13]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species , 2005, Science.

[14]  J. Drake Density-Dependent Demographic Variation Determines Extinction Rate of Experimental Populations , 2005, PLoS biology.

[15]  Katherine C. Kendall,et al.  A simulation test of the effectiveness of several methods for error‐checking non‐invasive genetic data , 2005 .

[16]  PAUL M. LUKACS,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES: ESTIMATING POPULATION SIZE FROM DNA-BASED CLOSED CAPTURE–RECAPTURE DATA INCORPORATING GENOTYPING ERROR , 2005 .

[17]  M. Proctor,et al.  SAMPLING DESIGN AND BIAS IN DNA-BASED CAPTURE–MARK–RECAPTURE POPULATION AND DENSITY ESTIMATES OF GRIZZLY BEARS , 2004 .

[18]  W. Link Nonidentifiability of Population Size from Capture‐Recapture Data with Heterogeneous Detection Probabilities , 2003, Biometrics.

[19]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[20]  D. Paetkau,et al.  An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA‐based population inventories , 2003, Molecular ecology.

[21]  J. D. Clark,et al.  Estimating black bear population density and genetic diversity at Tensas River, Louisiana using microsatellite DNA markers , 2003 .

[22]  D. P. A E T K A U,et al.  An empirical exploration of data quality in DNA-based population inventories , 2003 .

[23]  Leah Gerber,et al.  ARE WE RECOVERING? AN EVALUATION OF RECOVERY CRITERIA UNDER THE U.S. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT , 2002 .

[24]  Parviez R. Hosseini,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF MONITORING EFFORTS IN ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY PLANS , 2002 .

[25]  Craig R. Miller,et al.  The Endangered Species Act: Dollars and Sense? , 2002 .

[26]  Kenneth P. Burnham,et al.  ADVANCED FEATURES OF PROGRAM MARK , 2002 .

[27]  J. Robison-Cox,et al.  Estimating total human-caused mortality from reported mortality using data from radio-instrumented grizzly bears , 2002 .

[28]  M. Bruford,et al.  Genetic analysis reveals the wild ancestors of the llama and the alpaca , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  G. Mowat,et al.  DNA-based population estimate for grizzly bears Ursus arctos in northeastern British Columbia, Canada , 2001, Wildlife Biology.

[30]  E. E. Holmes,et al.  Estimating risks in declining populations with poor data , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  John Boulanger,et al.  Closure violation in DNA-based mark-recapture estimation of grizzly bear populations , 2001 .

[32]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION: Enhanced: The Risk of Extinction--What You Don't Know Will Hurt You , 2001 .

[33]  S. Pledger Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[34]  S. Andelman,et al.  Umbrellas and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Michael K. Schwartz,et al.  ESTIMATING ANIMAL ABUNDANCE USING NONINVASIVE DNA SAMPLING: PROMISE AND PITFALLS , 2000 .

[36]  David Paetkau,et al.  Genetic tagging of free-ranging black and brown bears , 1999 .

[37]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[38]  R. Ward,et al.  Variation in Genetic Diversity across the Range of North American Brown Bears , 1998 .

[39]  Christine M. Schonewald,et al.  Study design and interpretation of mammalian carnivore density estimates , 1998, Oecologia.

[40]  Gary C. White,et al.  Brown and black bear density estimation in Alaska using radiotelemetry and replicated mark-resight techniques , 1997 .

[41]  P Taberlet,et al.  Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.

[42]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. , 1996 .

[43]  D. Doak Source‐Sink Models and the Problem of Habitat Degradation: General Models and Applications to the Yellowstone Grizzly , 1995 .

[44]  I. Stirling,et al.  Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears , 1995, Molecular ecology.

[45]  S. Ennis,et al.  A PCR-based sex-determination assay in cattle based on the bovine amelogenin locus. , 2009, Animal genetics.

[46]  L. Scott Mills,et al.  A Useful Role for Theory in Conservation , 1994 .

[47]  A. Gibbons Mission impossible: saving all endangered species. , 1992, Science.

[48]  R. Azari,et al.  Scale, Variable Density, and Conservation Planning for Mammalian Carnivores , 1991 .

[49]  R. Huggins Some practical aspects of a conditional likelihood approach to capture experiments , 1991 .

[50]  B. Manly,et al.  Parsimonious modelling of capture―mark―recapture studies , 1985 .

[51]  L. Eberhardt,et al.  Population dynamics of Yellowstone grizzly bears , 1985 .

[52]  B. Weir,et al.  ESTIMATING F‐STATISTICS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POPULATION STRUCTURE , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[53]  Montana.,et al.  Grizzly bear recovery plan , 1982 .

[54]  W. Fitch,et al.  Construction of phylogenetic trees. , 1967, Science.