HRM-performance research: under-theorized and lacking explanatory power

The search for a measurable link between HR practices and organizational performance is currently preoccupying HR professionals, consultants, government and academics. Empirical research on this human resource management-performance (HRM-P) link is, however, marred by a serious problem: it is under-theorized. While some (but by no means all) researchers on the HRM-P link are aware of the problem, none are prepared to face up to the scale of the implications. Without theory, research on the HRM-P link lacks explanatory power. The only ‘solution’ on offer (the assertion that theory will develop via more and/or better empirical work) has been less than successful: empirical research has multiplied with little or no theoretical development. Nor can it. The under-theorization and lack of explanatory power is rooted in the ‘scientific’ perspective that underpins empirical research. The paper draws upon critical realist philosophy to reveal exactly why the ‘scientific’ approach encourages under-theorization and lack of explanatory power and, furthermore, why the ‘solution’ on offer cannot solve the problem. The conclusion notes why the HR community should not avoid philosophical issues.

[1]  A. F. Isbester.  Industrial and labor relations , 1967 .

[2]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Nothing Is Quite So Practical as a Good Theory , 1989 .

[3]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[4]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[5]  David-Hillel Ruben.  Realism in the social sciences , 1989 .

[6]  J. Kane.  Toward a modernized model of science , 1991 .

[7]  J. Arthur.  The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills , 1992 .

[8]  P. Wright,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management , 1992 .

[9]  Jason Lowther,et al.  Developments in the Management of Human Resources , 1994 .

[10]  K. Legge.  Human Resource Management: Rhetorics and Realities , 1995 .

[11]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[12]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[13]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[14]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[15]  Birgit Benkhoff.  Catching up on competitors: how organizations can motivate employees to work harder , 1996 .

[16]  D. Guest.  Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda , 1997 .

[17]  Birgit Benkhoff.  A test of the HRM model: good for employers and employees , 1997 .

[18]  T. Keenoy.  HRMism and the Languages of Re-presentation , 1997 .

[19]  T. Lawson.  Economics and Reality , 1997 .

[20]  Jochen Runde,et al.  Assessing causal economic explanations , 1998 .

[21]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[22]  John Storey,et al.  HRM and company performance: the use of measurement and the influence of economic cycles , 1998 .

[23]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  Human Resource Metrics: Can Measures Be Strategic? , 2000 .

[24]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN FIVE LEADING FIRMS , 1999 .

[25]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[26]  J. Palthe.  Results-Based Leadership: How Leaders Build the Business and improve the Bottom-Line: Human Resource Planning , 2000 .

[27]  Paul Evans,et al.  HRM on the Edge: A Duality Perspective , 1999 .

[28]  John Purcell,et al.  Best practice and best fit: chimera or cul‐de‐sac? , 1999 .

[29]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[30]  Robert Folger,et al.  Theorizing as the Thickness of Thin Abstraction , 1999 .

[31]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy , 2000 .

[32]  Jörgen Sandberg.  Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach , 2000 .

[33]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates? , 2000 .

[34]  C. Hendry,et al.  Performance and rewards: cleaning out the stables , 2000 .

[35]  P. Budhwar.  Strategic Integration and Devolvement of Human Resource Management in the UK Manufacturing Sector , 2000 .

[36]  Peter Haynes,et al.  Human resources, service quality and performance: a case study , 2000 .

[37]  Thomas E. Murphy,et al.  Data‐ and metrics‐driven approach to human resource practices: Using customers, employees, and financial metrics , 2000 .

[38]  Dora Scholarios,et al.  Employees and High-PerformanceWork Systems:Testinginside the Black Box , 2000 .

[39]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  MEASUREMENT ERROR IN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN RESOURCES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP: FURTHER EVIDENCE AND ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[40]  Hans Doorewaard,et al.  Strategic performance options in professional service organisations , 2000 .

[41]  J. Guthrie.  High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[42]  R. Peccei,et al.  Delivering Customer-Oriented Behaviour through Empowerment: An Empirical Test of HRM Assumptions , 2001 .

[43]  Paul Edwards,et al.  High-involvement work systems and performance outcomes: the strength of variable, contingent and context-bound relationships , 2001 .

[44]  Michael Ivor Reed,et al.  Organization, Trust and Control: A Realist Analysis , 2001 .

[45]  David Guest,et al.  Human resource management: when research confronts theory , 2001 .

[46]  Catherine Truss,et al.  Complexities and Controversies in Linking HRM with Organizational Outcomes , 2001 .

[47]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  The Effect of Human Resource Management Practices on Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from High-Tech Firms in Taiwan , 2002 .

[48]  K. J. Baldacchino,et al.  Understanding Management Research , 2002 .

[49]  Keld Laursen,et al.  The Importance of Sectoral Differences in the Application of Complementary HRM Practices for Innovation Performance , 2002 .

[50]  Pamela Mathews,et al.  The HR Scorecard: Linking People, Strategy and Performance , 2002, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management.

[51]  Freddy Winston Castro.  Explaining Society, Critical Realism in the Social Sciences , 2002 .

[52]  Juani Swart,et al.  Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box , 2003 .

[53]  Neil Conway,et al.  Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK , 2003 .

[54]  Brian Pinkstone.  Reorienting Economics , 2003 .

[55]  S. Bailey,et al.  Understanding people. , 2003, Nursing management.

[56]  R. Steel.  HRMR special issue on methodological issues in absenteeism research , 2003 .

[57]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units , 2003 .

[58]  T. Watson.  HRM and Critical Social Science Analysis , 2004 .

[59]  Neil Conway,et al.  Using sequential tree analysis to search for ‘bundles’ of HR practices , 2004 .

[60]  Jenny M. Hoobler,et al.  An analysis of current human resource management publications , 2004 .

[61]  Wendi Bukowitz,et al.  Human Capital Measurement , 2004 .

[62]  Harry Scarbrough,et al.  Evaluating human capital: An exploratory study of management practice. , 2004 .

[63]  D. D. Hartog,et al.  High performance work systems, organisational culture and firm effectiveness , 2004 .

[64]  J. Godard.  A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm , 2004 .

[65]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  Firing Blanks? An Analysis of Discursive Struggle in HRM , 2004 .

[66]  Paul Toulson,et al.  HR accounting as a measurement tool , 2004 .

[67]  Steve Fleetwood,et al.  The ontology of organisation and management studies , 2004 .

[68]  D. Bowen,et al.  Understanding HRM–Firm Performance Linkages: The Role of the “Strength” of the HRM System , 2004 .

[69]  Bob Carter,et al.  Making realism work : realist social theory and empirical research , 2004 .

[70]  L. Brazen.  The ROI of Human Capital: Measuring the Economic Value of Employee Performance , 2004 .

[71]  B. Danermark,et al.  Explaining Society : An Introduction to Critical Realism in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[72]  Toby D. Wall,et al.  The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science , 2005 .

[73]  Janet Walsh,et al.  Organisational flexibility and HRM in the hotel industry: evidence from Australia , 2005 .

[74]  S. Fleetwood.  The ontology of organisation and management studies: a critical realist approach , 2005 .

[75]  G. Dietz,et al.  Commonalities and contradictions in HRM and performance research , 2005 .

[76]  J. López,et al.  After Postmodernism: An Introduction to Critical Realism , 2005 .

[77]  S. Fleetwood.  Ontology in Organization and Management Studies: A Critical Realist Perspective , 2005 .

[78]  S. Fleetwood,et al.  High performance work systems, organisational performance and (lack of) predictive power , 2006 .