STILL WRESTLING WITH ‘CONTEXT’ IN INTERLANGUAGE THEORY

One of the most intractable issues in the field of second-language acquisition (SLA) research has been the attempt to identify the role of social context in influencing (or not) the process of acquisition of a second language. The central question has been whether a theory of SLA must account only for the psycholinguistic processes involved in acquiring an interlanguage (IL), or, alternatively, whether social and sociolinguistic factors influence those psycho-linguistic processes to such an extent that they too must be included in such a theory. It seems very clear that SLA is a psycholinguistic process. But to what extent are those psycholinguistic processes affected by social context? In 1985, Selinker and Douglas proposed a construct of ‘discourse domains’ to show how social and psycholinguistic processes might be included in a theory of inter-language; Young (1999) reviews that proposal and a recent attempt to test it, concluding that the results are still uncertain. After 15 years, this is still a lively issue in the field of SLA. Indeed, it is becoming a source of increasing conflict both within the field of SLA and within such areas of applied linguistics as second/foreign language teaching and second/foreign language teacher training. In this article, I will briefly summarize the problem, and review and summarize the current evidence being brought to bear upon this issue in the SLA research literature.

[1]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[2]  Michael H. Long.  Construct Validity in SLA Research: A Response to Firth and Wagner , 1997 .

[3]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[4]  Merrill Swain,et al.  A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Second Language Use in Immersion Classrooms , 1995 .

[5]  G.W.C.M. van Hest.  Self-repair in L1 and L2 production , 1996 .

[6]  R. Lyster.  RECASTS, REPETITION, AND AMBIGUITY IN L2 CLASSROOM DISCOURSE , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[7]  Elaine Tarone,et al.  Variation In Interlanguage , 1988 .

[8]  Dan Douglas,et al.  Wrestling with ‘Context’ in Interlanguage Theory* , 1985 .

[9]  Karen E. Johnson,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Knowledge-Base of Language Teacher Education , 1998 .

[10]  Nanda Poulisse.  Some words in defense of the psycholinguistic approach: A response to Firth and Wagner , 1997 .

[11]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Input, interaction, and the second language learner , 1994 .

[12]  Susan M. Gass,et al.  Apples and Oranges: Or, Why Apples Are Not Orange and Don't Need to Be A Response to Firth and Wagner , 1998 .

[13]  Guy Cook.  Language play, language learning , 2000 .

[14]  Pauline Foster.  A Classroom Perspective on the Negotiation of Meaning. , 1998 .

[15]  A. Firth,et al.  On Discourse, Communication, and (Some) Fundamental Concepts in SLA Research , 1997 .

[16]  Susana Blanco-Iglesias,et al.  Observations of language use in Spanish immersion classroom interactions , 1995 .

[17]  Dennis R. Preston.  Variationist Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[18]  Elizabeth Platt,et al.  Mary and Her Teachers: A Grebo-Speaking Child's Place in the Mainstream Classroom , 1997 .

[19]  Johannes Wagner,et al.  SLA PROPERTY: NO TRESPASSING , 1998 .

[20]  B. Rampton.  Crossing: Language and Ethnicity Among Adolescents , 1997 .

[21]  M. Swain,et al.  Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together , 1998 .

[22]  Michael H. Long.  INPUT, INTERACTION, AND SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1981 .

[23]  James P. Lantolf,et al.  Vygotskian Approaches to Second Language Research , 1994 .

[24]  Gabriele Kasper,et al.  “A” Stands for Acquisition: A Response to Firth and Wagner , 1997 .

[25]  Robert Bayley,et al.  Second language acquisition and linguistic variation , 1996 .

[26]  Richard Young,et al.  SOCIOLINGUISTIC APPROACHES TO SLA , 1999, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[27]  Susan Parks,et al.  Coping with On‐the‐Job Writing in ESL: A Constructivist‐Semiotic Perspective , 1999 .

[28]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  Input in an Institutional Setting. , 1996 .

[29]  Bonny Norton Peirce.  Social Identity, Investment, and Language Learning* , 1995 .

[30]  M. Swain.  Three functions of output in second language learning , 1995 .

[31]  Michael H. Long.  Linguistic and Conversational Adjustments to Non-Native Speakers , 1983, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.