Virtual Solar System Project: Learning Through a Technology-Rich, Inquiry-Based, Participatory Learning Environment

In this manuscript we describe an introductory astronomy course for undergraduate students in which we moved from the large-lecture format to one in which students were immersed in a technologically-rich, inquiry-based, participatory learning environment. Specifically, undergraduate students used 3-D modeling tools to construct virtual reality models of the solar system, and in the process, build rich understandings of various astronomical phenomena. For this study, primarily naturalistic inquiry was used to gain a holistic view of this semester-long course. These data are presented as two case studies focusing on: (1) the role of the teacher in this participatory learning environment; (2) the particular dynamics that formed in each group; (3) the modeling process; (4) the resources used, specifically student-developed inscriptions; and (5) the role of technology and whether learning the technology interfered with learning astronomy. Results indicated that VR can be used effectively in regular undergraduate university courses as a tool through which students can develop rich understandings of various astronomical phenomena.

[1]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Principles of Self-Organization: Learning as Participation in Autocatakinetic Systems , 1999 .

[2]  Michael J. Fox.  Stargazing , 2001, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[3]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[4]  Joan Solomon,et al.  Learning about energy: how pupils think in two domains , 1983 .

[5]  Richard Ruopp,et al.  LabNet: Toward a community of practice , 1993 .

[6]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[7]  Brockenbrough S. Allen,et al.  MEDIA AS LIVED ENVIRONMENTS: THE ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY , 1996 .

[8]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Knowing and Interacting: A Study of Culture, Practices, and Resources in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Classroom Guided by a Cognitive Apprenticeship Metaphor , 1995 .

[9]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Student Modelers , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[10]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[11]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Knowing, researching, and reporting science education: Lessons from science and technology studies , 1998 .

[12]  Jon E. Pedersen,et al.  Looking in the Mirror to Create an Interdisciplinary Team in Middle Level Teacher Education , 1999 .

[13]  Susan M. Land,et al.  A conceptual framework for the development of theories-in-action with open-ended learning environments , 1996 .

[14]  S. Gilbert.  Model building and a definition of science , 1991 .

[15]  Kevin Michael Carr,et al.  A Constructivist Approach To Reflective Judgment and Science Literacy in Introductory College Science Instruction. , 1997 .

[16]  Laurie D. Edwards,et al.  The Design and Analysis of a Mathematical Microworld , 1995 .

[17]  Giorgio De Michelis,et al.  Designing for Communities , 2000, D-CSCW.

[18]  Richard Lehrer,et al.  Developing Model-Based Reasoning , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[19]  K. Corby.  Soven, Margot Iris. (1999). Teaching Writing in Middle and Secondary Schools: Theory, Research, and Practice. Needham Heights, MA : Allyn & Bacon. , 1999 .

[20]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  “Ecologizing” Instruction through Integrated Units , 1999 .

[21]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Alternative perspectives of effective science teaching , 1988 .

[22]  E. C. Hodgman,et al.  A conceptual framework to guide nursing curriculum. , 1973, Nursing forum.

[23]  D. Jonassen.  Evaluating constructivistic learning , 1991 .

[24]  Christine M. Byrne.  Water on tap: the use of virtual reality as an educational tool , 1996 .

[25]  Francis F. Martin,et al.  Computer modeling and simulation , 1968 .

[26]  R. Pea.  Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education , 1993 .

[27]  B. Wilson.  Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in Instructional Design , 1995 .

[28]  André Maurois,et al.  A Private Universe , 1932 .

[29]  A. Sfard.  On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[30]  Thomas A. Schwandt,et al.  Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation , 2007 .

[31]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[32]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Making Dynamic Modeling Accessible to Precollege Science Students , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[33]  E. Guba,et al.  Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. , 1982 .

[34]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[35]  Chris Dede,et al.  Multisensory Immersion as a Modeling Environment for Learning Complex Scientific Concepts , 1999 .

[36]  William Winn.  The Virtual Reality Roving Vehicle Project. , 1995 .

[37]  New Zealand,et al.  presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational , 2000 .

[38]  Wolff-Michael Rolf.  Knowledge Diffusion in a Grade 4-5 Classroom during a Unit on Civil Engineering: An Analysis of a Classroom Community in Terms of Its Changing Resources and Practices. , 1996 .

[39]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Secondary Students' Dynamic Modeling Processes: Analyzing, Reasoning About, Synthesizing, and Testing Models of Stream Ecosystems , 1997 .

[40]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers in the Classroom: Mindtools for Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[41]  John Baxter.  A constructivist approach to astronomy in the National Curriculum , 1991 .

[42]  J. M. A. LENIHAN.  Physics Education , 1965, Nature.

[43]  Michael Scriven,et al.  Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation , 2000 .

[44]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[45]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice , 1998 .

[46]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Problem Based Learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework , 1995 .

[47]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students , 1998 .

[48]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[49]  Charlotte W. Farr,et al.  Matching Media, Methods, and Objectives in Distance Education. , 1993 .

[50]  Steven J. Stratford.  A review of computer-based model research in precollege science classrooms , 1997 .

[51]  Nora H. Sabelli.  On Using Technology for Understanding Science , 1994, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[52]  Reinders Duit,et al.  Students' Alternative Frameworks and Science Education. Bibliography. 3rd Edition. IPN Reports-in-Brief = Alltagsvorstellungen und Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht. Bibliographie. 3. Auflage. IPN-Kurzberichte. , 1991 .

[53]  Robert E. Stake,et al.  Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation , 1983 .

[54]  T. P. Carpenter,et al.  Problem Solving as a Basis for Reform in Curriculum and Instruction: The Case of Mathematics , 1996 .

[55]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[56]  John D. Bransford,et al.  New approaches to instruction: because wisdom can't be told , 1989 .

[57]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .

[58]  E. Soloway,et al.  Learning With Peers: From Small Group Cooperation to Collaborative Communities , 1996 .

[59]  D. Clements,et al.  RESEARCH ON COOPERATIVE LEARNING: IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE , 1991 .

[60]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  Grounded constructions and how technology can help , 1998 .

[61]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning and achievement. , 1990 .