Effect of target change during the simple attack in fencing

Abstract The aim of this study was to test the effect that changing targets during a simple long lunge attack in fencing exerts on the temporal parameters of the reaction response, the execution speed, and the precision and the coordination of the movement pattern. Thirty fencers with more than 10 years of experience participated in this study. Two force platforms were used to record the horizontal components of the reaction forces and thereby to determine the beginning of the movement. A three-dimensional (3D) system recorded the spatial positions of the 9 markers situated on the fencer plus the epee, while a moving target was projected on a screen, enabling the control of the target change. The results indicated that when a target change is provoked the reaction time (RT), movement time (MT), and the time used in the acceleration phase of the centre of mass (CM) increases significantly with respect to the attack executed with a straight thrust. The speed and horizontal distance reached by the CM at the end of the acceleration phase (VX(CM) and SX(CM), respectively) significantly decreased, while the errors increased. However, the temporal sequence of the movement pattern did not appreciably change.

[1]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  R. Passingham,et al.  Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  D. Meyer,et al.  The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  H. Woltring On optimal smoothing and derivative estimation from noisy displacement data in biomechanics , 1985 .

[5]  A Walmsley,et al.  Response Amendment in Fencing: Differences between Elite and Novice Subjects , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  Jesús Dapena,et al.  The effect of muscular pre-tensing on the sprint start. , 2006, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[7]  Julie Duque,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Evidence for Two Concurrent Inhibitory Mechanisms during Response Preparation , 2010 .

[8]  E. Kreighbaum,et al.  Biomechanics: A Qualitative Approach for Studying Human Movement , 1981 .

[9]  G. Savelsbergh,et al.  Ventral and dorsal system contributions to visual anticipation in fast ball sports. , 2008 .

[10]  F. Sanderson,et al.  The effect of directional uncertainty on reaction time and movement time in a fencing task , 1983 .

[11]  René Marois,et al.  Mapping the pathways of information processing from sensation to action in four distinct sensorimotor tasks , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[12]  R. Schmidt,et al.  Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[13]  D. Kourtis,et al.  Neurophysiology of Implicit Timing in Serial Choice Reaction-Time Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Goodale,et al.  An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  Z. Borysiuk,et al.  Information Processes, Stimulation and Perceptual Training in Fencing , 2008 .

[16]  KongFatt Wong-Lin,et al.  Sequential Effects in Two-Choice Reaction Time Tasks: Decomposition and Synthesis of Mechanisms , 2009, Neural Computation.

[17]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[18]  Donatella Spinelli,et al.  Neural correlates of fast stimulus discrimination and response selection in top-level fencers , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[20]  M. Desmurget,et al.  A parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.