Co-creation and User Perspectives for Upper Limb Prosthetics
暂无分享,去创建一个
Kianoush Nazarpour | Agamemnon Krasoulis | Laurence P. J. Kenney | Matthew Dyson | Kaveh Memarzadeh | Sarah Day | Sigrid S. G. Dupan | Hannah Jones | Margaret Donovan-Hall | Maxford Coutinho | M. Dyson | Agamemnon Krasoulis | K. Nazarpour | L. Kenney | K. Memarzadeh | M. Donovan-Hall | Sarah Day | S. Dupan | H. Jones | Max Coutinho
[1] Janne M. Hahne,et al. Longitudinal Case Study of Regression-Based Hand Prosthesis Control in Daily Life , 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience.
[2] Rinaldo Sacchetti,et al. Impact of Michelangelo prosthetic hand: Findings from a crossover longitudinal study. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[3] P. Kyberd,et al. Survey of Upper-Extremity Prosthesis Users in Sweden and the United Kingdom , 2007 .
[4] Cynthia A Chestek,et al. Factors associated with interest in novel interfaces for upper limb prosthesis control , 2017, PloS one.
[5] M. Granat,et al. Technology for monitoring everyday prosthesis use: a systematic review , 2020, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.
[6] Loredana Zollo,et al. Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users , 2016, Front. Neurosci..
[7] J. Tseng,et al. Payment to Research Participants , 2017 .
[8] Elaine Biddiss,et al. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.
[9] Dario Farina,et al. Translating Research on Myoelectric Control into Clinics—Are the Performance Assessment Methods Adequate? , 2017, Front. Neurorobot..
[10] K. Seah. COVID-19: Exposing digital poverty in a pandemic , 2020, International Journal of Surgery.
[11] Jo Maybin. Policy Analysis and Policy Know-how: A Case Study of Civil Servants in England’s Department of Health , 2015 .
[12] C. K. van der Sluis,et al. Upper Limb Absence: Predictors of Work Participation and Work Productivity. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.
[13] Camille Nebeker,et al. Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study , 2019, BMJ Open.
[14] E. Biddiss,et al. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.
[15] Christian Cipriani,et al. Objectives, criteria and methods for the design of the SmartHand transradial prosthesis , 2009, Robotica.
[16] L. Battistella,et al. Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it , 2018, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.
[17] Kianoush Nazarpour,et al. Arduino-Based Myoelectric Control: Towards Longitudinal Study of Prosthesis Use , 2021, Sensors.
[18] M. Dyson,et al. Co-Creation Facilitates Translational Research on Upper Limb Prosthetics , 2021, Prosthesis.
[19] J. Davidson. A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. , 2002, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.
[20] Tyler Davis,et al. Portable Take-Home System Enables Proportional Control and High-Resolution Data Logging With a Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Bionic Arm , 2020, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.
[21] M.R.M. Crul,et al. Models of Co-Creation , 2016 .
[22] Trisha Greenhalgh,et al. Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees , 2015, BMC Medical Ethics.
[23] J. Langley,et al. Risk & Reward. Exploring Design’s role in measuring outcomes in health , 2019, The Design Journal.
[24] P. Gøtzsche,et al. Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors , 2018, British Medical Journal.
[25] Joe Langley,et al. The need for distributed co-design in healthcare contexts , 2018 .
[26] O. Aszmann,et al. Current rates of prosthetic usage in upper-limb amputees – have innovations had an impact on device acceptance? , 2020, Disability and rehabilitation.
[27] Dr. Gary Hickey. The potential for coproduction to add value to research , 2018, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.
[28] Sridhar P. Arjunan,et al. Prosthetic hand control: A multidisciplinary review to identify strengths, shortcomings, and the future , 2019, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..
[29] D G Altman,et al. GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research , 2017, British Medical Journal.
[30] J. Sloan,et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.
[31] Control of Prosthetic Hands: Challenges and emerging avenues , 2020 .
[32] Peter H. Jones. Contexts of Co-creation: Designing with System Stakeholders , 2018 .
[33] L Kenney,et al. Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance , 2018, Scientific Reports.
[34] Kianoush Nazarpour. A more human prosthetic hand , 2020, Science Robotics.
[35] K. Oliver,et al. Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? , 2017, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[36] Kathryn Oliver,et al. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? , 2019, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[37] Todd A. Kuiken,et al. Pattern recognition and direct control home use of a multi-articulating hand prosthesis , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).
[38] Kristin Østlie,et al. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.
[39] Colin Tysall,et al. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities , 2014, The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
[40] E. Biddiss,et al. Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.
[41] Z. C. Thumser,et al. Long-Term Home-Use of Sensory-Motor-Integrated Bidirectional Bionic Prosthetic Arms Promotes Functional, Perceptual, and Cognitive Changes , 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience.
[42] Tyler Davis,et al. Portable Take-Home System Enables Proportional Control and High-Resolution Data Logging With a Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Bionic Arm , 2020, bioRxiv.
[43] Dustin J. Tyler,et al. Learning of Artificial Sensation Through Long-Term Home Use of a Sensory-Enabled Prosthesis , 2019, Front. Neurosci..
[44] K Postema,et al. Prosthesis rejection in children with a unilateral congenital arm defect , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.
[45] M. Dyson,et al. Perception of game-based rehabilitation in upper-limb prosthetic training: a survey of users and researchers , 2020, medRxiv.
[46] M. Dyson,et al. Perception of Game-Based Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Prosthetic Training: Survey of Users and Researchers , 2020, JMIR serious games.
[47] Anthony Shakeshaft,et al. What is the Co-Creation of New Knowledge? A Content Analysis and Proposed Definition for Health Interventions , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.
[48] Alicia J. Davis,et al. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.
[49] Oli Williams,et al. Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production , 2020, Health Research Policy and Systems.
[50] C. Jang,et al. A Survey on Activities of Daily Living and Occupations of Upper Extremity Amputees , 2011, Annals of rehabilitation medicine.
[51] Gary Hickey,et al. Co-production from proposal to paper , 2018, Nature.