Effectiveness of the PECS Phase III app and choice between the app and traditional PECS among preschoolers with ASD

Abstract We investigated the efficacy of a tablet-computer-based Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) application for use with three preschoolers with ASD and investigated participant preference for the app versus traditional PECS (i.e., with a physical communication book) once the participants demonstrated minimal levels of mastery of both. We implemented a single-case multiple baseline design to determine the efficacy of the app. Results indicated that participants rapidly demonstrated above-chance level mastery of the app. Following mastery, two participants demonstrated a preference for the app, while the other preferred the traditional PECS communication book.

[1]  M. Tincani,et al.  Comparing the Picture Exchange Communication System and Sign Language Training for Children With Autism , 2004 .

[2]  M. Wolery,et al.  The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education , 2005 .

[3]  D. Moore,et al.  Functional Communication and Other Concomitant Behavior Change Following PECS Training: A Case Study , 2007, Behaviour Change.

[4]  M. F. Hanline,et al.  Enhancing the Alternative and Augmentative Communication Use of a Child with Autism through a Parent‐implemented Naturalistic Intervention , 2007 .

[5]  R. Schlosser,et al.  Effects of Synthetic Speech Output and Orthographic Feedback on Spelling in a Student with Autism: A Preliminary Study , 1998, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[6]  Lori Frost,et al.  The picture exchange communication system : training manual , 2002 .

[7]  W. Fisher,et al.  The evaluation and treatment of aggression maintained by attention and automatic reinforcement. , 1998, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[8]  S. Axelrod,et al.  Topography-versus selection-based responding: Comparison of mand acquisitions in each modality. , 2001 .

[9]  L. LeBlanc,et al.  Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. , 2002, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[10]  Sheila R. Alber-Morgan,et al.  The effects of parent-implemented PECS training on improvisation of mands by children with autism. , 2009, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[11]  Matthew S. Goodwin,et al.  Technology for just-in-time in-situ learning of facial affect for persons diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder , 2008, Assets '08.

[12]  Barry E. Chatterton.  What's That ... ? , 2010 .

[13]  Dale J. Prediger,et al.  Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives , 1981 .

[14]  Katie Kemmerer,et al.  Brief Report: Increasing Communication Skills for an Elementary-Aged Student with Autism Using the Picture Exchange Communication System , 2002, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[15]  Mandy Rispoli,et al.  An aggregate study of single-case research involving aided AAC: Participant characteristics of individuals with autism spectrum disorders , 2011 .

[16]  Pamela S. Wolfe,et al.  Teaching Children With Autism to Ask “What's That?” Using a Picture Communication With Vocal Results , 2011 .

[17]  Meredith K. Jones.  Autism Spectrum Rating Scales (ASRS) , 2014 .

[18]  Joanne M. Cafiero,et al.  The Effect of an Augmentative Communication Intervention on the Communication, Behavior, and Academic Program of an Adolescent with Autism , 2001 .

[19]  J. Baio.  Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders--Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 sites, United States, 2008. , 2012, Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries.

[20]  S. Johnston,et al.  The Use of Visual Supports in Teaching Young Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder to Initiate Interactions , 2003 .

[21]  Ann Bernadt.  Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) , 1995 .

[22]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[23]  Ralf W Schlosser,et al.  Effects of speech and print feedback on spelling by children with autism. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Teaching picture naming to two adolescents with autism spectrum disorders using systematic instruction and speech-generating devices , 2012 .

[25]  Tonya N. Davis,et al.  The Effects of Enhanced Milieu Teaching and a Voice Output Communication Aid on the Requesting of Three Children with Autism , 2007, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[26]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism , 2006, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[27]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Effects of Synthetic Speech Output on Requesting and Natural Speech Production in Children with Autism: A Preliminary Study. , 2007 .

[28]  Tonya N. Davis,et al.  An analysis of the effects of functional communication and a Voice Output Communication Aid for a child with autism spectrum disorder , 2008 .

[29]  Tonya N. Davis,et al.  Using iPods(®) and iPads(®) in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[30]  Janet B W Williams,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 2013 .

[31]  J. Ganz,et al.  Moderation of effects of AAC based on setting and types of aided AAC on outcome variables: An aggregate study of single-case research with individuals with ASD , 2014, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[32]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Bottom-Up Analysis of Single-Case Research Designs , 2012 .

[33]  P. Locke,et al.  Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods. , 1994, Research in developmental disabilities.

[34]  Mandy Rispoli,et al.  The effect of instructional use of an iPad on challenging behavior and academic engagement for two , 2013 .

[35]  Kimberly J. Vannest,et al.  Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. , 2011, Behavior therapy.

[36]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. , 2011, Research in developmental disabilities.

[37]  J. Sigafoos,et al.  An Examination of Preference for Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices with Two Boys with Significant Intellectual Disabilities , 2009, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[38]  D. Reid,et al.  Increasing communicative interactions of young children with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. , 1998, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[39]  Thomas R. Kratochwill,et al.  Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the Procedural and Coding Manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. , 2002 .

[40]  Jennifer B. Ganz,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Single Case Research Studies on Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems with Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2011, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[41]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Speech-generating devices versus manual signing for children with developmental disabilities. , 2012, Research in developmental disabilities.

[42]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Toward Functional Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Students With Autism: Manual Signs, Graphic Symbols, and Voice Output Communication Aids. , 2003, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[43]  Gillian R. Hayes,et al.  Designing for interaction immediacy to enhance social skills of children with autism , 2010, UbiComp.

[44]  Fabio Pianesi,et al.  Enhancing social communication of children with high-functioning autism through a co-located interface , 2009, AI & SOCIETY.

[45]  Richard I. Parker,et al.  Impact of the Picture Exchange Communication System: Effects on Communication and Collateral Effects on Maladaptive Behaviors , 2009, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[46]  J. Ganz,et al.  Meta-analysis of PECS with individuals with ASD: investigation of targeted versus non-targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, and implementation phase. , 2012, Research in developmental disabilities.

[47]  I. DeLeon,et al.  The influence of matching and motor-imitation abilities on rapid acquisition of manual signs and exchange-based communicative responses. , 2009, Journal of applied behavior analysis.