Line-edge roughness in positive-tone chemically amplified resists: effect of additives and processing conditions

Nanometer scale line edge roughness (LER) is an increasingly important factor in critical dimension control as the minimum feature sizes of devices continue to shrink. We previously studied the material origin of the resist LER in silicon containing positive-tone chemically amplified resists by emulating the resist compositions ana analyzing morphology in the line edge region with atomic force microscopy (AFM). We concluded that the LER stems mainly from the phase incompatibility of the protected and de- protected polymers. In this paper, we expand our study to also include the non-silicon containing chemically amplified resists. We present results on the effects of casting solvent, photoacid generator, and base additive on the surface roughness of thin films of neat partially protected polymers and blends of the protected and the de-protected polymers. We also investigated the surface roughness of neat partially protected polymer films under various development conditions. The AFM results reinforce our previous conclusion on the material origin of LER in chemically amplified resists. Strategies to minimize LER will also be discussed.

[1]  Tsuneo Terasawa,et al.  Effects of Molecular-Weight Distributions of Resist Polymers and Process Control on Lithography for 0.1μm and Below , 1997 .

[2]  Lap Chan,et al.  Effects of process parameters on pattern-edge roughness of chemically amplified resists , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Qinghuang Lin,et al.  Toward controlled resist line-edge roughness: material origin of line-edge roughness in chemically amplified positive-tone resists , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Tomoki Inoue,et al.  Striations on Si Trench Sidewalls Observed by Atomic Force Microscopy , 1997 .

[5]  Lewis W. Flanagin,et al.  Surface roughness development during photoresist dissolution , 1999 .

[6]  Georg Pawlowski,et al.  Lithography and line-edge roughness of high-activation-energy resists , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Kenji Yamazaki,et al.  Nanometer-scale linewidth fluctuations caused by polymer aggregates in resist films , 1997 .

[8]  Shinji Okazaki,et al.  Nano edge roughness in polymer resist patterns , 1993 .

[9]  Shinji Okazaki,et al.  Suppression of Acid Diffusion in Chemical Amplification Resists by Molecular Control of Base Matrix Polymers , 1995 .

[10]  Eiji Takeda,et al.  Molecular Scale E-Beam Resist Development Simulation for Pattern Fluctuation Analysis , 1993 .

[11]  F. Cerrina,et al.  Process dependence of roughness in a positive-tone chemically amplified resist , 1998 .

[12]  Martha I. Sanchez,et al.  Deep-ultraviolet interferometric lithography as a tool for assessment of chemically amplified photoresist performance , 1998 .

[13]  James W. Taylor,et al.  Factors contributing to sidewall roughness in a positive-tone, chemically amplified resist exposed by x-ray lithography , 1999 .

[14]  Shinji Okazaki,et al.  Correlation of Nano Edge Roughness in Resist Patterns with Base Polymers , 1993 .