Evaluation of pectoralis major muscle in patients with posterior breast tumors on breast MR images: early experience.

PURPOSE To evaluate the ability to use breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to assess disease extent in patients with posterior breast masses who are suspected to have tumor invasion into underlying muscle. MATERIALS AND METHODS Nineteen patients with posterior breast masses underwent three-dimensional, gradient-echo, 1.5-T MR imaging before and after the administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Thirteen had deep palpable masses that were clinically determined to be fixed to the underlying chest wall. Twelve had mammographic findings that caused muscle involvement to be suspected, and seven had normal mammograms. All patients underwent surgery. MR images were reviewed and were correlated with histologic findings. RESULTS Enhancing masses were identified on MR images in all 19 patients. Five (26%) of the 19 patients had masses that abutted the muscles, with obliteration of the fat plane and muscle enhancement. All five had muscle involvement at surgery. In the remaining 14 (74%) patients, no enhancement of muscle was seen; none of these had invasion of the muscle at surgery. CONCLUSION Extension of adjacent tumor into underlying musculature was indicated by abnormal enhancement within these structures. Violation of the fat plane between tumor and muscle, without other findings, did not indicate tumor involvement of these deep structures.

[1]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. , 1989, Radiology.

[2]  D. Dershaw,et al.  Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation) , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  A. Luini,et al.  Radiotherapy after breast-preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Analysis of 462 breast carcinomas. , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[5]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[6]  M D Schnall,et al.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. , 1995, Radiology.

[7]  B. Fornage,et al.  Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size , 1987, Cancer.

[8]  M. Lagios Pathologic features related to local recurrence following lumpectomy and irradiation. , 1992, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[9]  B. Carter,et al.  Computed tomography of the chest wall. , 1980, Radiology.

[10]  M. Schnall,et al.  High-resolution MR imaging of the breast: clinical context. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  W. Willett,et al.  Breast cancer (2). , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  R L Ehman,et al.  MR imaging of the abdomen with a phased-array multicoil: prospective clinical evaluation. , 1995, Radiology.

[13]  J M Pruneda,et al.  MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  H. Genant,et al.  Musculoskeletal neoplasm: perineoplastic edema versus tumor on dynamic postcontrast MR images with spatial mapping of instantaneous enhancement rates. , 1995, Radiology.