Speech-Motor Control and Interhemispheric Relations in Recovered and Persistent Stuttering

The neurological basis of stuttering is associated with anomalies of interhemispheric relations and of the neural mechanisms of speech-motor control, specifically those involving the supplementary motor area (SMA). Stuttering typically develops through childhood and adolescence but many children will recover without formal treatment or intervention. The hypothesis that such spontaneous recovery is related to a maturation of the SMA is explored. Four experimental tasks were performed by adults whose stuttering has persisted, adults who reported having stuttered as children, and a control group of adults who reported never having stuttered. A Sequence Reproduction Finger Tapping task (Webster, 1986) and a Bimanual Crank Turning task (Preilowski, 1972) examined the functioning of the SMA, and 2 Divided Visual Field tasks examined asymmetries of hemispheric activation. The overall pattern of results for persistent stutterers compared to nonstutterers was consistent with motor-perceptual anomalies previously reported in the literature. The Bimanual Crank Turning task revealed additionally that the bimanual coordination deficits reported in adults who stutter are kinesthetically based and mediated through anterior callosal systems, including the SMA. Ex-stutterers were similar to nonstutterers in their performance of the motor control tasks, but similar to persistent stutterers in perceptual asymmetries associated with Divided Visual Field tasks. Taken together, the results from the four experimental tasks support the general hypothesis that an anomaly in interhemispheric relations and a deficit in the mechanisms of speech-motor control are each a necessary but not sufficient condition for stuttering and that recovery from childhood stuttering reflects a maturation of the mechanisms of speech-motor control.

[1]  W. G. Webster.  Evidence in bimanual finger-tapping of an attentional component to stuttering , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. Ingham,et al.  A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering , 1996, Nature.

[4]  G. Blood.  Laterality differences in child stutterers: heterogeneity, severity levels, and statistical treatments. , 1985, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[5]  M. Rastatter,et al.  Vocal reaction times of stuttering subjects to tachistoscopically presented concrete and abstract words: a closer look at cerebral dominance and language processing. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  David C. Forster,et al.  Concurrent task interference in stutterers: dissociating hemispheric specialization and activation. , 1991, Canadian journal of psychology.

[7]  J. Brust.  Lesions of the supplementary motor area. , 1996, Advances in neurology.

[8]  A. Luessenhop,et al.  Cerebral dominance in stutterers determined by Wada testing , 1973, Neurology.

[9]  H. Fitzgerald,et al.  Bimanual handwriting reveals delayed interhemispheric integration in childhood stuttering , 1992 .

[10]  G. Andrews,et al.  Stuttering: an investigation into cerebral dominance for speech , 1972, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  R E Carson,et al.  Altered patterns of cerebral activity during speech and language production in developmental stuttering. An H2(15)O positron emission tomography study. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  S. Chapman,et al.  Linguistic performance and regional cerebral blood flow in persons who stutter. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  J. Abbs,et al.  Kinematic analysis of multiple movement coordination during speech in stutterers. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  R. Curlee,et al.  Early Intervention With Early Childhood Stuttering , 1997 .

[15]  T Landis,et al.  Lateralized lexical decisions and the effects of hemifield masks: a study of interhemispheric inhibition and release. , 1993, The International journal of neuroscience.

[16]  W. Haynes,et al.  Linguistic processing and reaction time differences in stutterers and nonstutterers. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  J. Abbs,et al.  Kinaesthetic acuity of stutterers and non-stutterers for oral and non-oral movements. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  W. H. Moore,et al.  Dichotic Ear Preferences of Stuttering Children and Adults , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[19]  J. I. Todor,et al.  Age Differences In The Magnitude Of Associated Movement , 1987, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  M. Rastatter,et al.  Simple visual versus lexical decision vocal reaction times of stuttering and normal subjects , 1987 .

[21]  W. G. Webster.  Response sequence organization and reproduction by stutterers , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  G. Andrews,et al.  Stuttering: a review of research findings and theories circa 1982. , 1983, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[23]  C. Brinkman.  Supplementary motor area of the monkey's cerebral cortex: short- and long-term deficits after unilateral ablation and the effects of subsequent callosal section , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  E. Ross,et al.  Left‐handed mirror writing following right anterior cerebral artery infarction , 1988, Neurology.

[25]  W. G. Webster,et al.  Family history as a basis for subgrouping people who stutter. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  W. G. Webster.  Neural mechanisms underlying stuttering: Evidence from bimanual handwriting performance , 1988, Brain and Language.

[27]  R. E. Hicks,et al.  Lexical discrimination and letter-string identification in the two visual fields , 1979, Brain and Language.

[28]  Lisa M. D. Archibald,et al.  The relationship between stuttering severity and kinesthetic acuity for jaw movements in adults who stutter , 1999 .

[29]  F. Freeman,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow in developmental stutterers. , 1991, Archives of neurology.

[30]  P. Finn.  Establishing the validity of recovery from stuttering without formal treatment. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[31]  B. Preilowski,et al.  Possible contribution of the anterior forebrain commissures to bilateral motor coordination. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[33]  D. Pandya,et al.  Supplementary motor area structure and function: Review and hypotheses , 1985 .

[34]  M. Peters,et al.  A nontrivial motor performance difference between right-handers and left-handers: attention as intervening variable in the expression of handedness. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[35]  M. Jeeves,et al.  Role of the corpus callosum in the development of a bimanual motor skill , 1988 .

[36]  B. Bracken,et al.  Effects of Cerebral Dominance on College-Level Achievement , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[37]  G. Andrews,et al.  The Syndrome of Stuttering , 1965 .

[38]  P. T. Quinn1.  STUTTERING: CEREBRAL DOMINANCE AND THE DICHOTIC WORD TEST , 1972 .

[39]  N J Cox,et al.  The genetic basis of persistence and recovery in stuttering. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[40]  H. Goodglass,et al.  Dichotic testing of cerebral dominance in stutterers , 1980, Brain and Language.

[41]  W. H. Moore.  Bilateral tachistoscopic word perception of stutterers and normal subjects , 1976, Brain and Language.

[42]  W. G. Webster.  Neuropsychological models of stuttering—I. Representation of sequential response mechanisms , 1985, Neuropsychologia.

[43]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Visual field differences in verbal tasks: Effects of task familiarity and sex of subject , 1978, Brain and Language.

[44]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[45]  M. Bryden,et al.  On the Relation between Visual Spatial Attention and Visual Field Asymmetries , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[46]  W. Haynes,et al.  Alpha hemispheric asymmetry and stuttering: some support for a segmentation dysfunction hypothesis. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[47]  W Hulstijn,et al.  From planning to articulation in speech production: what differentiates a person who stutters from a person who does not stutter? , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[48]  G. Blood,et al.  Laterality preferences in adult female and male stutterers , 1989 .

[49]  W. H. Moore,et al.  Hemispheric alpha asymmetries of words with positive, negative, and neutral arousal values preceding tasks of recall and recognition: Electrophysiological and behavioral results from stuttering males and nonstuttering males and females , 1982, Brain and Language.

[50]  G. Woolf,et al.  The assessment of stuttering as struggle, avoidance, and expectancy. , 1967, The British journal of disorders of communication.

[51]  S. Kravetz,et al.  Hemisphericity and Top-Down Processing of Language , 1993, Brain and Language.

[52]  Frederic K. W. Curry,et al.  The performance of stutterers on dichotic listening tasks thought to reflect cerebral dominance. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[53]  Bimanual hand writing in right-handed and left-handed stutterers and nonstutterers , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  C. Brinkman,et al.  Lesions in supplementary motor area interfere with a monkey's performance of a bimanual coordination task , 1981, Neuroscience Letters.

[55]  W. G. Webster.  Motor performance of stutterers: a search for mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.