Dual-energy digital mammography utilizing stimulated phosphor computed radiography.

Dual-energy subtraction is a radiographic technique for the acquisition of a material selective image by the weighted subtraction of low- and high-energy digital X-ray images. This is achieved by exploiting the energy dependence of the X-ray attenuation components in the image. This can allow the removal of background morphology to enhance the presentation of otherwise obscured details. The detection of microcalcifications in a mammogram by dual-energy techniques has previously been investigated. These investigations indicated that, using dual-energy techniques, small microcalcifications could be extracted from the background breast morphology with sufficient signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be full visualized. The authors present the extension of a theoretical dual-energy model to incorporate practical considerations and then compare the results with experimentally derived data using a commercially available computed radiography system. In particular the extended model now takes into account the energy dependent detective quantum efficiency of a system. This is thought to be a major factor in reducing the efficiency of dual-energy mammography. The theoretical model predicts that dual-exposure dual-energy mammography, utilizing HRIII image plates, could not provide a detail SNR of five for calcifications smaller than 470 mu m. The experimental results verify this and indicate that dual-energy subtraction mammography, utilizing computed radiography, is currently not a viable technique for the detection of clinically significant microcalcifications. Further advances in X-ray image detector efficiency will be required if the full potential of this technique is to be achieved.

[1]  G S Shaber,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: a detector analysis. , 1990, Medical physics.

[2]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[3]  G T Barnes,et al.  An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography. , 1989, Medical physics.

[4]  J M Boone Color mammography. Image generation and receiver operating characteristic evaluation. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[5]  A Fenster,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results. , 1985, Medical physics.

[6]  A Fandos-Morera,et al.  Breast tumors: composition of microcalcifications. , 1988, Radiology.

[7]  H Liu,et al.  Charge-coupled device detector: performance considerations and potential for small-field mammographic imaging applications. , 1992, Medical physics.

[8]  Arnold R. Cowen,et al.  Signal, noise and SNR transfer properties of computed radiography , 1993 .

[9]  C A Mistretta,et al.  Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography: improved detection and processing. , 1990, Radiology.

[10]  T. Ishigaki,et al.  One-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging. , 1986, Radiology.

[11]  A R Cowen,et al.  Physical evaluation of computed radiography as a mammographic X-ray imaging system. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[13]  D. Dance Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.