Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers.

Introduction of tumor markers into routine clinical practice has been poorly controlled, with few criteria or guidelines as to how such markers should be used. We propose a Tumor Marker Utility Grading System (TMUGS) to evaluate the clinical utility of tumor markers and to establish an investigational agenda for evaluation of new tumor markers. A Tumor Marker Utility Grading Worksheet has been designed. The initial portion of this worksheet is used to clarify the precise characteristics of the marker in question. These characteristics include the marker designation, the molecule and/or substance and the relevant alteration from normalcy, the assay format and reagents, the specimen type, and the neoplastic disease for which the marker is being evaluated. To determine the clinical utility of each marker, one of several potential uses must be designated, including risk assessment, screening, differential diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring clinical course. For each of these uses, associations between marker assay results and expected biologic process and end points must be determined. However, knowledge of tumor marker data should contribute to a decision in practice that results in a more favorable clinical outcome for the patient, including increased overall survival, increased disease-free survival, improvement in quality of life, or reduction in cost of care. Semiquantitative utility scales have been developed for each end point. The only markers recommended for use in routine clinical practice are those that are assigned utility scores of "++" or " " on a 6-point scale (ranging from 0 to ) in the categories relative to more favorable clinical outcomes. Each utility score assignment should be supported by documentation of the level of evidence used to evaluate the marker. TMUGS will establish a standardized analytic technique to evaluate clinical utility of known and future tumor markers. It should result in improved patient outcomes and more cost-efficient investigation and application of tumor markers.

[1]  W Godolphin,et al.  Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. , 1989, Science.

[2]  P M Ravdin,et al.  Neural Network Analysis of DNA flow cytometry histograms. , 1993, Cytometry.

[3]  G. Strauss,et al.  Use of tumor markers in lung cancer. , 1994, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[4]  L. Demers,et al.  Elevated soluble c-erbB-2 antigen levels in the serum and effusions of a proportion of breast cancer patients. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[6]  E. Kawasaki,et al.  Accumulation of p53 tumor suppressor gene protein: an independent marker of prognosis in breast cancers. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  H. Burke,et al.  Artificial neural networks for cancer research: outcome prediction. , 1994, Seminars in surgical oncology.

[8]  D. Hayes,et al.  Circulating tumor markers in breast cancer. , 1989, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[9]  Lloyd M. Smith,et al.  Statement on use of DNA testing for presymptomatic identification of cancer risk. National Advisory Council for Human Genome Research. , 1994, JAMA.

[10]  G. Bosl,et al.  Serum Tumor Marker Half-Life during Chemotherapy in Patients with Germ Cell Tumors , 1994, The International journal of biological markers.

[11]  A Gafni,et al.  The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  S. Friend,et al.  Germ-line mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene in patients with high risk for cancer inactivate the p53 protein. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Wei Chen,et al.  Existent T-cell and antibody immunity to HER-2/neu protein in patients with breast cancer. , 1994, Cancer research.

[14]  W Wood,et al.  Prediction of prognosis in primary breast cancer by detection of a high molecular weight mucin-like antigen using monoclonal antibodies DF3, F36/22, and CU18: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  R. Sanson-Fisher,et al.  Measuring quality of life in cancer patients. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[17]  F. Freiha,et al.  Serum markers in germ cell neoplasms. , 1991, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[18]  D. Seigel,et al.  Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: ophthalmologic disorders. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  S. Rodenhuis,et al.  Cellular protoonocogenes are infrequently amplified in untreated non-small cell lung cancer. , 1989, British Journal of Cancer.

[20]  L. Carey,et al.  A retrospective and prospective study of serial CEA determinations in the early detection of recurrent colon cancer. , 1979, American journal of surgery.

[21]  J. Garber Markers of risk for human malignancies. , 1994, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[22]  C. Redmond,et al.  A randomized clinical trial evaluating sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil in the treatment of patients with node-negative breast cancer who have estrogen-receptor-negative tumors. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  M. Gent,et al.  When is a prognostic factor useful? A guide for the perplexed. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  D. Lin,et al.  Evaluating the role of CD4-lymphocyte counts as surrogate endpoints in human immunodeficiency virus clinical trials. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  M. Skolnick,et al.  A collaborative survey of 80 mutations in the BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Implications for presymptomatic testing and screening. , 1995, JAMA.

[26]  Earlybreastcancertrialistscol,et al.  Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy 133 randomised trials involving 31 000 recurrences and 24 000 deaths among 75 000 women , 1992, The Lancet.

[27]  J. Benda,et al.  Preservation of Estrogen Receptor in Paraffin Sections , 1994 .

[28]  G M Clark,et al.  Prediction of relapse or survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  S. Woolf Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[30]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[31]  I. Ellis,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen immunocytochemistry in primary breast cancer , 1989, Cancer.

[32]  C. L. Callahan,et al.  The quality of life. , 1970, Nursing outlook.

[33]  H. Burke,et al.  Criteria for prognostic factors and for an enhanced prognostic system , 1993, Cancer.

[34]  R C Coombes,et al.  Immunocytochemical assay for estrogen receptor in patients with breast cancer: relationship to a biochemical assay and to outcome of therapy. , 1986, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[36]  W. McGuire,et al.  Prognostic factors and treatment decisions in axillary-node-negative breast cancer. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[38]  S. George Statistical considerations and modeling of clinical utility of tumor markers. , 1994, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[39]  D. G. Altman,et al.  Statistical aspects of prognostic factor studies in oncology. , 1994, British Journal of Cancer.

[40]  M. Skolnick,et al.  BRCA1 mutations in primary breast and ovarian carcinomas. , 1994, Science.

[41]  A. Cruz,et al.  Results of a 400‐patient carcinoembryonic antigen second‐look colorectal cancer study , 1985, Cancer.

[42]  V. Chinchilli,et al.  Elevated serum c-erbB-2 antigen levels and decreased response to hormone therapy of breast cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[43]  A. Kaluzny,et al.  The National Cancer Institute and guideline development: lessons from the breast cancer screening controversy. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[44]  R. Gelber,et al.  Quality of life in clinical trials of adjuvant therapies. International Breast Cancer Study Group (formerly Ludwig Group). , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[45]  A. Thor,et al.  Prognostic significance of p53 overexpression in node-negative breast carcinoma: preliminary studies support cautious optimism. , 1993 .

[46]  A. Buzdar,et al.  Evaluation of patients after primary therapy for early breast cancer , 1993 .

[47]  C. Redmond,et al.  A randomized clinical trial evaluating tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with node-negative breast cancer who have estrogen-receptor-positive tumors. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  D. Hayes Tumor markers for breast cancer. , 1993, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[49]  C. Taylor,et al.  An exaltation of experts: concerted efforts in the standardization of immunohistochemistry. , 1994, Human pathology.

[50]  S. Ellenberg,et al.  CEA Monitoring Among Patients in Multi‐institutional Adjuvant G.I. Therapy Protocols , 1982, Annals of surgery.

[51]  W. McGuire,et al.  How to integrate steroid hormone receptor, flow cytometric, and other prognostic information in regard to primary breast cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[52]  I. Tannock,et al.  Goals of palliative cancer therapy. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[53]  H. Rubin,et al.  Internists' Attitudes about Clinical Practice Guidelines , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[54]  T. Shawker,et al.  A Prospective Analysis of Laboratory Tests and Imaging Studies To Detect Hepatic Lesions , 1982, Annals of surgery.

[55]  S. Naber,et al.  Detection and quantitation of the human neu oncoprotein , 1991 .

[56]  E. Klein Tumor markers in testis cancer. , 1993, The Urologic clinics of North America.