Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits cell cycle progression by downregulation of E2F1 in human glioblastoma multiforme cells

Background. The active components of Cannabis sativa L., Cannabinoids, traditionally used in the field of cancer for alleviation of pain, nausea, wasting and improvement of well-being have received renewed interest in recent years due to their diverse pharmacologic activities such as cell growth inhibition, anti-inflammatory activity and induction of tumor regression. Here we used several experimental approaches, which identified delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) as an essential mediator of cannabinoid antitumoral action. Methods and results. Administration of Δ9-THC to glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) cell lines results in a significant decrease in cell viability. Cell cycle analysis showed G0/1 arrest and did not reveal occurrence of apoptosis in the absence of any sub-G1 populations. Western blot analyses revealed a THC altered cellular content of proteins that regulate cell progression through the cell cycle. The cell content of E2F1 and Cyclin A, two proteins that promote cell cycle progression, were suppressed in both U251-MG and U87-MG human glioblastoma cell lines, whereas the level of p16INK4A, a cell cycle inhibitor was upregulated. Transcription of thymidylate synthase (TS) mRNA, which is promoted by E2F1, also declined as evident by QRT-PCR. The decrease in E2F1 levels resulted from proteasome mediated degradation and was prevented by proteasome inhibitors. Conclusions. Δ9-THC is shown to significantly affect viability of GBM cells via a mechanism that appears to elicit G1 arrest due to downregulation of E2F1 and Cyclin A. Hence, it is suggested that Δ9-THC and other cannabinoids be implemented in future clinical evaluation as a therapeutic modality for brain tumors.

[1]  M. Guzmán,et al.  Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits cell cycle progression in human breast cancer cells through Cdc2 regulation. , 2006, Cancer research.

[2]  新谷 康 New prognostic indicator for non-small-cell lung cancer, quantitation of thymidylate synthase by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction , 2004 .

[3]  S. Miyoshi,et al.  New prognostic indicator for non‐small‐cell lung cancer, quantitation of thymidylate synthase by real‐time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[4]  M. Fukushima,et al.  Significance of thymidylate synthase activity in renal cell carcinoma. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[5]  M. Nakagawa,et al.  Clinical significance of thymidylate synthase expression in bladder cancer , 2002, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[6]  D. Kraemer,et al.  Chemotherapeutic dose intensification for treatment of malignant brain tumors: Recent developments and future directions , 2002, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[7]  M. Vitale,et al.  Control by the endogenous cannabinoid system of ras oncogene‐dependent tumor growth , 2001, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[8]  C. James,et al.  PTEN mutation, EGFR amplification, and outcome in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  P. R. Yew,et al.  Ubiquitin‐mediated proteolysis of vertebrate G1‐ and S‐phase regulators , 2001, Journal of cellular physiology.

[10]  C. Felder,et al.  The endocannabinoid nervous system: unique opportunities for therapeutic intervention. , 2001, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[11]  I. Galve-Roperh,et al.  Control of the cell survival/death decision by cannabinoids , 2001, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[12]  M. Cortés,et al.  Anti-tumoral action of cannabinoids: Involvement of sustained ceramide accumulation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[13]  P. Kleihues,et al.  Primary and secondary glioblastomas: from concept to clinical diagnosis. , 1999, Neuro-oncology.

[14]  N. Dyson The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. , 1998, Genes & development.

[15]  W. Yung,et al.  Adenovirus-mediated p16/CDKN2 gene transfer suppresses glioma invasion in vitro , 1997, Oncogene.

[16]  E. Flemington,et al.  Regulation of E2F through ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent degradation: stabilization by the pRB tumor suppressor protein. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  M. Berger,et al.  Silencing of p16/CDKN2 expression in human gliomas by methylation and chromatin condensation. , 1996, Cancer research.

[18]  J. Bruner,et al.  Mutations of the p16 gene in gliomas. , 1996, Oncogene.

[19]  J. Nevins,et al.  Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesis- and G1/S-regulatory genes , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[20]  X. Graña,et al.  Cell cycle control in mammalian cells: role of cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs), growth suppressor genes and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs). , 1995, Oncogene.

[21]  W. Cavenee,et al.  Replacement of the p16/CDKN2 gene suppresses human glioma cell growth. , 1995, Cancer research.

[22]  David O. Morgan,et al.  Principles of CDK regulation , 1995, Nature.

[23]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  CDKN2 (p16/MTS1) gene deletion or CDK4 amplification occurs in the majority of glioblastomas. , 1994, Cancer research.

[24]  R. Pepperkok,et al.  Cyclin A is required at two points in the human cell cycle. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[25]  R. Carchman,et al.  Antineoplastic activity of cannabinoids. , 1975, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.