Functional Molecular Ecological Networks

ABSTRACT Biodiversity and its responses to environmental changes are central issues in ecology and for society. Almost all microbial biodiversity research focuses on “species” richness and abundance but not on their interactions. Although a network approach is powerful in describing ecological interactions among species, defining the network structure in a microbial community is a great challenge. Also, although the stimulating effects of elevated CO2 (eCO2) on plant growth and primary productivity are well established, its influences on belowground microbial communities, especially microbial interactions, are poorly understood. Here, a random matrix theory (RMT)-based conceptual framework for identifying functional molecular ecological networks was developed with the high-throughput functional gene array hybridization data of soil microbial communities in a long-term grassland FACE (free air, CO2 enrichment) experiment. Our results indicate that RMT is powerful in identifying functional molecular ecological networks in microbial communities. Both functional molecular ecological networks under eCO2 and ambient CO2 (aCO2) possessed the general characteristics of complex systems such as scale free, small world, modular, and hierarchical. However, the topological structures of the functional molecular ecological networks are distinctly different between eCO2 and aCO2, at the levels of the entire communities, individual functional gene categories/groups, and functional genes/sequences, suggesting that eCO2 dramatically altered the network interactions among different microbial functional genes/populations. Such a shift in network structure is also significantly correlated with soil geochemical variables. In short, elucidating network interactions in microbial communities and their responses to environmental changes is fundamentally important for research in microbial ecology, systems microbiology, and global change. IMPORTANCE Microorganisms are the foundation of the Earth's biosphere and play integral and unique roles in various ecosystem processes and functions. In an ecosystem, various microorganisms interact with each other to form complicated networks. Elucidating network interactions and their responses to environmental changes is difficult due to the lack of appropriate experimental data and an appropriate theoretical framework. This study provides a conceptual framework to construct interaction networks in microbial communities based on high-throughput functional gene array hybridization data. It also first documents that elevated carbon dioxide in the atmosphere dramatically alters the network interactions in soil microbial communities, which could have important implications in assessing the responses of ecosystems to climate change. The conceptual framework developed allows microbiologists to address research questions unapproachable previously by focusing on network interactions beyond the listing of, e.g., the number and abundance of species. Thus, this study could represent transformative research and a paradigm shift in microbial ecology. Microorganisms are the foundation of the Earth's biosphere and play integral and unique roles in various ecosystem processes and functions. In an ecosystem, various microorganisms interact with each other to form complicated networks. Elucidating network interactions and their responses to environmental changes is difficult due to the lack of appropriate experimental data and an appropriate theoretical framework. This study provides a conceptual framework to construct interaction networks in microbial communities based on high-throughput functional gene array hybridization data. It also first documents that elevated carbon dioxide in the atmosphere dramatically alters the network interactions in soil microbial communities, which could have important implications in assessing the responses of ecosystems to climate change. The conceptual framework developed allows microbiologists to address research questions unapproachable previously by focusing on network interactions beyond the listing of, e.g., the number and abundance of species. Thus, this study could represent transformative research and a paradigm shift in microbial ecology.

[1]  J. Fuhrman,et al.  Community structure of marine bacterioplankton: patterns, networks, and relationships to function , 2008 .

[2]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  S. McMahon,et al.  NMDA receptors and activity-dependent tuning of the receptive fields of spinal cord neurons , 1994, Nature.

[4]  P. Reich,et al.  [Letters to nature] , 1975, Nature.

[5]  P. Bork,et al.  Molecular eco-systems biology: towards an understanding of community function , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[6]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Fuhrman General Distributions and the 'rare Biosphere' Microbial Community Structure and Its Functional Implications Review Insight , 2022 .

[8]  Jun Dong,et al.  Geometric Interpretation of Gene Coexpression Network Analysis , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Martina Morris,et al.  A statnet Tutorial. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[10]  J. Galloway,et al.  An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle , 2008, Nature.

[11]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  P. Dixon VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology , 2003 .

[13]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The assembly and disassembly of ecological networks , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Adam Kleczkowski,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil , 2005 .

[17]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[18]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[19]  Jean-Pierre Gabriel,et al.  Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure , 2004, Nature.

[20]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Modularity in Metabolic Networks , 2002, Science.

[21]  Feng Luo,et al.  Constructing gene co-expression networks and predicting functions of unknown genes by random matrix theory , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[22]  Timothy S Gardner,et al.  Reverse-engineering transcription control networks. , 2005, Physics of life reviews.

[23]  Y. Leea,et al.  Analysis of oncogenic signaling networks in glioblastoma identifies ASPM as a molecular target , 2006 .

[24]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  Snapshot of iron response in Shewanella oneidensis by gene network reconstruction , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[25]  Kathryn Fraughnaugh,et al.  Introduction to graph theory , 1973, Mathematical Gazette.

[26]  Zhong Jian-Xin,et al.  APPLICATION OF RANDOM MATRIX THEORY TO MICROARRAY DATA FOR DISCOVERING FUNCTIONAL GENE MODULES OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA , 2009 .

[27]  D. Krackhardt Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations , 1994 .

[28]  Marc-Thorsten Hütt,et al.  Organization of Excitable Dynamics in Hierarchical Biological Networks , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[29]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[30]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Scale-Free Networks: A Decade and Beyond , 2009, Science.

[31]  S. Horvath,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology , 2011 .

[32]  Carter T. Butts,et al.  Social Network Analysis with sna , 2008 .

[33]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Habitat modification alters the structure of tropical host–parasitoid food webs , 2007, Nature.

[35]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[36]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Habitat loss and the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[37]  P. Reich,et al.  Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2 , 2006, Nature.

[38]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Classes of complex networks defined by role-to-role connectivity profiles. , 2007, Nature physics.

[40]  Richard H. Scheuermann,et al.  Application of random matrix theory to biological networks , 2005, q-bio/0503035.

[41]  D Curtis,et al.  Use of an artificial neural network to detect association between a disease and multiple marker genotypes , 2001, Annals of human genetics.

[42]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Application of random matrix theory to microarray data for discovering functional gene modules. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  A. Hastings,et al.  Strong effect of dispersal network structure on ecological dynamics , 2008, Nature.

[44]  Baohua Gu,et al.  GeoChip: a comprehensive microarray for investigating biogeochemical, ecological and environmental processes , 2007, The ISME Journal.

[45]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  GeoChip-based analysis of metabolic diversity of microbial communities at the Juan de Fuca Ridge hydrothermal vent , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Michael L. Creech,et al.  Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[47]  Charles T. Garten,et al.  Spatial scaling of functional gene diversity across various microbial taxa , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[49]  Christopher L. Hemme,et al.  Hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress responses in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough. , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[50]  Jizhong Zhou,et al.  Metagenomic analysis reveals a marked divergence in the structure of belowground microbial communities at elevated CO2. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[51]  U. Alon Biological Networks: The Tinkerer as an Engineer , 2003, Science.

[52]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[53]  Debojyoti Dutta,et al.  Local similarity analysis reveals unique associations among marine bacterioplankton species and environmental factors , 2006, Bioinform..

[54]  M. Heimann,et al.  Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks , 2008, Nature.

[55]  Chris Arney Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations , 2012 .

[56]  M. Stephanov,et al.  Random Matrices , 2005, hep-ph/0509286.

[57]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[58]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[59]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .