WALK-MAN Humanoid Robot : Field Experiments in a Post-earthquake Scenario

Nowadays human intervention is the only effective course of action after a natural or artificial disaster. This is true both for the relief operations where search–and–rescue of survivors is the priority, and for subsequent activities such as the ones devoted to building assessment. In these contexts the use of robotic systems would be beneficial to drastically reduce operators’ risk exposure. The readiness level of the robots still prevents their effective exploitation in relief operations, that are highly critical and characterized by severe time constraints. On the contrary current robotic technologies can be profitably applied in procedures like building assessment after an earthquake. To date, these operations are carried out by engineers and architects who inspect numerous buildings over a large territory, with a high cost in terms of time and assets, and with a high risk due to aftershocks. The main idea is to have the robot acting as an alter-ego of the human operator, who, thanks to a virtual reality device and a body tracking system based on inertial sensors, teleoperates the robot. The goal of this paper is to exploit the perception and manipulation capabilities of the WALK-MAN robot for building assessment in areas affected by earthquakes. The presented work illustrates the hardware and software characteristics of the developed robotic platform, and results obtained with field testing in the real earthquake scenario of Amatrice, Italy. Finally considerations on the experience and feedback provided by civil engineers and architects engaged in the activities are reported and discussed.

[1]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  Computer control of space-borne teleoperators with sensory feedback , 1985, Proceedings. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[3]  P. Green,et al.  Telepresence surgery , 1995 .

[4]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Teleoperation Concepts in Minimal Invasive Surgery , 2001 .

[5]  Wang Yuechao,et al.  CURRENT RESEARCH,KEY PERFORMANCES AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF SEARCH AND RESCUE ROBOT , 2006 .

[6]  Giorgio Metta,et al.  YARP: Yet Another Robot Platform , 2006 .

[7]  Joshua Mehling,et al.  Centaur: NASA's Mobile Humanoid Designed for Field Work , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Taucer Fabio,et al.  Field Manual for Post-Earthquake Damage and Safety Assessment and Short Term Countermeasures (AeDES) , 2007 .

[9]  Shugen Ma,et al.  Current research, key performances and future development of search and rescue robots , 2007, Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering in China.

[10]  Sebastian O. H. Madgwick,et al.  An efficient orientation filter for inertial and inertial / magnetic sensor arrays , 2010 .

[11]  Sebastian Madgwick,et al.  Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[12]  Stefan Kohlbrecher,et al.  A flexible and scalable SLAM system with full 3D motion estimation , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics.

[13]  Changmok Choi,et al.  Synergy matrices to estimate fluid wrist movements by surface electromyography. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  Radu Bogdan Rusu,et al.  3D is here: Point Cloud Library (PCL) , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Vijay R. Kumar,et al.  Collaborative Mapping of an Earthquake Damaged Building via Ground and Aerial Robots , 2012, FSR.

[16]  Mario Gianni,et al.  Rescue robots at earthquake-hit Mirandola, Italy: A field report , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR).

[17]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Teleimpedance control of a synergy-driven anthropomorphic hand , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for the design and control of the Pisa/IIT SoftHand , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A Modular Approach for Remote Operation of Humanoid Robots in Search and Rescue Scenarios , 2014, MESAS.

[20]  Ryan J. Murphy,et al.  Approaches to robotic teleoperation in a disaster scenario: From supervised autonomy to direct control , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[21]  A. Cheung,et al.  The effect of visuohaptic delays on task performance and human control strategy in manual control tasks , 2016 .

[22]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  XBotCore: A Real-Time Cross-Robot Software Platform , 2017, 2017 First IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC).

[23]  Jörn Malzahn,et al.  WALK‐MAN: A High‐Performance Humanoid Platform for Realistic Environments , 2017, J. Field Robotics.

[24]  Sven Behnke,et al.  NimbRo Rescue: Solving Disaster‐response Tasks with the Mobile Manipulation Robot Momaro , 2017, J. Field Robotics.