Issues and Challenges in Selection

[1]  Gregory M. Hurtz,et al.  An Assessment of the Prevalence, Severity, and Verifiability of Entry-Level Applicant Faking Using the Randomized Response Technique , 2003 .

[2]  Samuel Messick,et al.  Time and Method in Coaching for the SAT. , 1981 .

[3]  F. Lievens,et al.  Personnel selection: a longstanding story of impact at the individual, firm, and societal level , 2020, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

[4]  Huy Le,et al.  Beyond alpha: an empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[5]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  MULTI‐STAGE SELECTION STRATEGIES: A MONTE CARLO INVESTIGATION OF EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE AND MINORITY HIRING , 1996 .

[6]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[7]  Sandra W. DeGrassi,et al.  What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  M. Kerrin,et al.  Situational judgement tests represent a measurement method and can be designed to minimise coaching effects , 2013, Medical Education.

[9]  N. Gafni,et al.  Multiple Mini-Interviews in the Age of the Internet: Does Preparation Help Applicants to Medical School? , 2017 .

[10]  F. Lievens,et al.  The Effects of Coaching on Situational Judgment Tests in High‐Stakes Selection , 2012 .

[11]  Lara D. Zibarras,et al.  Evaluating candidate reactions to selection practices using organisational justice theory , 2011, Medical education.

[12]  D. Paulhus,et al.  The over-claiming technique: measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Michael A. McDaniel,et al.  Subgroup Differences in Situational Judgment Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[14]  I. Wilson,et al.  Does practice make perfect? The effect of coaching and retesting on selection tests used for admission to an Australian medical school , 2008, The Medical journal of Australia.

[15]  F. Lievens,et al.  Widening access in selection using situational judgement tests: evidence from the UKCAT , 2016, Medical education.

[16]  Sarah B. Lueke,et al.  Towards a Theory of Applicant Faking: Integrating Studies of Deception , 1999 .

[17]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  THE DIVERSITY–VALIDITY DILEMMA: STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING RACIOETHNIC AND SEX SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES AND ADVERSE IMPACT IN SELECTION , 2008 .

[18]  R. Klassen,et al.  Applicant Reactions to a Situational Judgment Test used for Selection into Initial Teacher Training , 2014, International Journal of Educational Psychology.

[19]  Richard L. Griffith,et al.  Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior , 2007 .

[20]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[21]  Klaus G. Melchers,et al.  A review of applicant faking in selection interviews , 2020 .

[22]  Delroy L. Paulhus,et al.  Social desirable responding: The evolution of a construct , 2002 .

[23]  R R Holden,et al.  Do response time limitations counteract the effect of faking on personality inventory validity? , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Patrick H. Raymark,et al.  Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  D. Jackson,et al.  The Impact of Faking on Employment Tests: Does Forced Choice Offer a Solution? , 2000 .

[26]  S. Gilliland.  The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective , 1993 .

[27]  Betsy Jane Becker,et al.  Coaching for the Scholastic Aptitude Test: Further Synthesis and Appraisal , 1990 .

[28]  M. Sheldon.  Conditions Affecting the Fakability of Teacher-Selection Inventories , 1959 .

[29]  Jill E. Ellingson,et al.  High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education. Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[30]  J. Cleland,et al.  Selection methods in healthcare professions: where are we now and where next? , 2017, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[31]  A. Furnham.  Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation , 1986 .

[32]  Gary N. Burns,et al.  Methods of Measuring Faking Behavior , 2011 .

[33]  J. Salgado,et al.  Predicting job performance using FFM and non-FFM personality measures , 2003 .

[34]  David Chan,et al.  Applicant Perceptions of Test Fairness: Integrating Justice and Self-Serving Bias Perspectives , 1998 .

[35]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Dichotomization of continuous variables: the implications for meta-analysis , 1990 .

[36]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  THE DIVERSITY–VALIDITY DILEMMA: OVERVIEW AND LEGAL CONTEXT , 2008 .

[37]  John P. Hausknecht,et al.  Retesting in selection: a meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  N. Anderson,et al.  Applicant Perspectives During Selection: A Review Addressing “So What?,” “What’s New?,” and “Where to Next?” , 2017 .

[39]  M. Buehner,et al.  Measurement Educational and Psychological Modeling Socially Desirable Responding and Its Effects , 2022 .

[40]  I. B. Myers.  Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[41]  A. Ryan,et al.  Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  T. Maurer,et al.  Interviewee coaching, preparation strategies, and response strategies in relation to performance in situational employment interviews: an extension of Maurer, Solamon, and Troxtel (1998). , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  J. Levashina,et al.  A Model of Faking Likelihood in the Employment Interview , 2006 .

[44]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research. , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  R. Holden.  Socially desirable responding does moderate personality scale validity both in experimental and in nonexperimental contexts. , 2007 .

[46]  T. Maurer,et al.  Relationship of coaching with performance in situational employment interviews. , 1998, Journal of Applied Psychology.

[47]  I. Wilson,et al.  Faking good: self‐enhancement in medical school applicants , 2012, Medical education.

[48]  C. A. Pauls,et al.  Effects of different instructional sets on the construct validity of the NEO-PI-R , 2005 .

[49]  Jade V. Rushby,et al.  Using video- and text-based situational judgement tests for teacher selection: a quasi-experiment exploring the relations between test format, subgroup differences, and applicant reactions , 2020 .

[50]  George M. Alliger,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Susceptibility of Integrity Tests to Faking and Coaching , 2000 .

[51]  F. Lievens,et al.  The Effects of Predictor Method Factors on Selection Outcomes: A Modular Approach to Personnel Selection Procedures , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  L. R. Goldberg.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARKERS FOR THE BIG-FIVE FACTOR STRUCTURE , 1992 .

[53]  Filip Lievens,et al.  Recent trends and challenges in personnel selection , 2002 .

[54]  Rose A. Mueller-Hanson,et al.  Faking and selection: considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  M. A. Campion,et al.  APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS) , 2001 .