Chirality of glutathione surface coating affects the cytotoxicity of quantum dots.

Quantum dots (QDs) have been extensively investigated as fluorescent probes and are emerging as a new class of agents for biomedical imaging and diagnosis because of their broad absorption profiles, tunable emission wavelengths, and high photooxidation stability. QDs consist of an inorganic core surrounded by an organic shell. Normally, different types of biomolecules, such as amino acids, DNA, or peptides, are used for the organic shell to facilitate water solubility and biocompatibility of the QDs. However, because the core may contain toxic heavy metals (e.g., Cd, Hg, Pb, and Zn), the potential cytotoxicity of QDs has been a major impediment to their widespread application. It has therefore become critical to fully understand the interactions between QDs and living cells in order to develop nontoxic and biocompatible QDs for clinical use. Early studies have suggested that the release of core components, the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and nonspecific binding to cellular membranes and intracellular proteins are the major mechanisms of the observed cytotoxic effects of QDs. Despite a significant surge in the number of investigations into the cytotoxicity of QDs, there is currently only limited knowledge about the cytological and physiological mediators of these effects. Interestingly, recent data have suggested that the induction of autophagy by certain sizes of QDs could play an important role in their toxic actions. Autophagy is a metabolic process involved in protein and organelle degradation and plays key roles in maintaining cellular homeostasis and contributing to cellular defense. It has been recognized as a third pathway of cell death, after apoptosis and necrosis, and is responsive to various physicopathological stimuli. Recent work has shown that small QDs (< 10 nm) rather than those with larger sizes (40–50 nm) induce autophagy in cultured cells. This size-dependent induction of autophagy has also been reported for other nanoparticles (NPs). However, all the above studies focused on the effects of type and size of the NPs, while other factors that may induce autophagy remain unexplored. Although many studies have demonstrated that surface modification of QDs with biomolecules endows them with various biological functionalities, the impact on living organisms of the chirality of the surface biomolecules has been largely neglected. Chirality is an important phenomenon in living systems and nearly all biological polymers must be homochiral to function. For example, all amino acids in proteins are “left-handed”, whereas all sugars in DNA and RNA are “right-handed”. Different chiral properties of biomolecules may determine their ability to interact with other biomolecules and thereby modulate a range of downstream processes. More recently, several attempts to develop chiral QDs with optical activities using different chiral stabilizers have been reported. Herein, the effects of QDs capped with different chiral forms of the tripeptide glutathione (GSH) on cytotoxicity and induction of autophagy were examined. Two different sizes of cadmium telluride (CdTe) QDs coated with either l-GSH (lGSH-QDs) or d-GSH (d-GSH-QDs) were found to show dose-dependent cytotoxicity and to significantly increase the levels of autophagic vacuoles. The activation of autophagy was chirality-dependent, with l-GSH-QDs being more effective than d-GSH-QDs. The ability of QDs to induce cell death was correlated with their ability to induce autophagy. This chirality-associated regulation of cellular metabolism and cytotoxicity highlights the important role of the conformation of the stabilizers, and has important implications for the design of novel QDs with enhanced optical properties and reduced or no toxicity. In this study, negatively charged water-soluble CdTe QDs were synthesized according to the Rogach–Weller method and coated with different chiral forms of GSH as stabilizers (Figure 1a). To clearly understand the chirality effect, two series of QDs were prepared. Group 1 comprised small-sized [*] Y. Li, Prof. Y. Zhao, Prof. G. Nie CAS Key Laboratory for Biological Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology 11 Beiyijie, Zhongguancun, Beijing 100190 (China) E-mail: niegj@nanoctr.cn

[1]  Y. Tsujimoto,et al.  Another way to die: autophagic programmed cell death , 2005, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[2]  Y. Gun’ko,et al.  Chiral shells and achiral cores in CdS quantum dots. , 2008, Nano letters.

[3]  M. Yezhelyev,et al.  Nanoparticles as a Novel Class of Autophagy Activators , 2007, Autophagy.

[4]  S. Doak,et al.  NanoGenotoxicology: the DNA damaging potential of engineered nanomaterials. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[5]  Wendelin J Stark,et al.  Nanoparticles in biological systems. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[6]  M. C. Mancini,et al.  Bioimaging: second window for in vivo imaging. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[7]  W. Bonner,et al.  Chirality and life , 1995, Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere.

[8]  T. Xia,et al.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. , 2009, Nature materials.

[9]  Tim Liedl,et al.  Cytotoxicity of colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles. , 2005, Nano letters.

[10]  S. Stern,et al.  Role for nanomaterial-autophagy interaction in neurodegenerative disease , 2008, Autophagy.

[11]  O. Seleverstov,et al.  Semiconductor nanocrystals in autophagy research: methodology improvement at nanosized scale. , 2009, Methods in enzymology.

[12]  S. Perrett,et al.  Novel Glutaredoxin Activity of the Yeast Prion Protein Ure2 Reveals a Native-like Dimer within Fibrils* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Igor L. Medintz,et al.  Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing , 2005, Nature materials.

[14]  Electronic structure of and quantum size effect in III-V and II-VI semiconducting nanocrystals using a realistic tight binding approach , 2005, cond-mat/0505451.

[15]  N. Kotov,et al.  Gold nanoparticles enhance the anti-leukemia action of a 6-mercaptopurine chemotherapeutic agent. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  Zhiyong Tang,et al.  Similar topological origin of chiral centers in organic and nanoscale inorganic structures: effect of stabilizer chirality on optical isomerism and growth of CdTe nanocrystals. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[17]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[18]  N. Kotov,et al.  Gold nanoparticles with stable yellow-green luminescence , 2007 .

[19]  Robert N Grass,et al.  Oxide nanoparticle uptake in human lung fibroblasts: effects of particle size, agglomeration, and diffusion at low concentrations. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Robert N Grass,et al.  In vitro cytotoxicity of oxide nanoparticles: comparison to asbestos, silica, and the effect of particle solubility. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  S. Nie,et al.  Quantum dot bioconjugates for ultrasensitive nonisotopic detection. , 1998, Science.

[22]  H. Yamawaki,et al.  Cytotoxicity of water-soluble fullerene in vascular endothelial cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[23]  W. Stark Nanopartikel in biologischen Systemen , 2011 .

[24]  O. Seleverstov,et al.  Semiconductor nanocrystals in autophagy research: methodology improvement at nanosized scale. , 2009, Methods in enzymology.

[25]  Nikolai Gaponik,et al.  THIOL-CAPPING OF CDTE NANOCRYSTALS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO ORGANOMETALLIC SYNTHETIC ROUTES , 2002 .

[26]  Tsuyoshi Kawai,et al.  Optical activity and chiral memory of thiol-capped CdTe nanocrystals. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[27]  Daniel J. Klionsky,et al.  Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion , 2008, Nature.

[28]  John M Kelly,et al.  Chiral highly luminescent CdS quantum dots. , 2007, Chemical communications.

[29]  F. Cecconi,et al.  The role of autophagy in mammalian development: cell makeover rather than cell death. , 2008, Developmental cell.