Object-Based Classification of Ikonos Imagery for Mapping Large-Scale Vegetation Communities in Urban Areas

Effective assessment of biodiversity in cities requires detailed vegetation maps. To date, most remote sensing of urban vegetation has focused on thematically coarse land cover products. Detailed habitat maps are created by manual interpretation of aerial photographs, but this is time consuming and costly at large scale. To address this issue, we tested the effectiveness of object-based classifications that use automated image segmentation to extract meaningful ground features from imagery. We applied these techniques to very high resolution multispectral Ikonos images to produce vegetation community maps in Dunedin City, New Zealand. An Ikonos image was orthorectified and a multi-scale segmentation algorithm used to produce a hierarchical network of image objects. The upper level included four coarse strata: industrial/commercial (commercial buildings), residential (houses and backyard private gardens), vegetation (vegetation patches larger than 0.8/1ha), and water. We focused on the vegetation stratum that was segmented at more detailed level to extract and classify fifteen classes of vegetation communities. The first classification yielded a moderate overall classification accuracy (64%, κ = 0.52), which led us to consider a simplified classification with ten vegetation classes. The overall classification accuracy from the simplified classification was 77% with a κ value close to the excellent range (κ = 0.74). These results compared favourably with similar studies in other environments. We conclude that this approach does not provide maps as detailed as those produced by manually interpreting aerial photographs, but it can still extract ecologically significant classes. It is an efficient way to generate accurate and detailed maps in significantly shorter time. The final map accuracy could be improved by integrating segmentation, automated and manual classification in the mapping process, especially when considering important vegetation classes with limited spectral contrast.

[1]  C. Small High spatial resolution spectral mixture analysis of urban reflectance , 2003 .

[2]  M. Herold,et al.  Object-oriented mapping and analysis of urban land use / cover using IKONOS data , 2002 .

[3]  P. Gong,et al.  Object-based Detailed Vegetation Classification with Airborne High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery , 2006 .

[4]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  Bird assemblages of a fragmented agricultural landscape and the relative importance of vegetation structure and landscape pattern , 2007 .

[5]  Frank W. Gerlach,et al.  IKONOS satellite, imagery, and products , 2003 .

[6]  Martin Volk,et al.  The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[7]  Chad Hendrix,et al.  A Comparison of Urban Mapping Methods Using High-Resolution Digital Imagery , 2003 .

[8]  R. Smitha,et al.  Urban domestic gardens ( IX ) : Composition and richness of the vascular plant flora , and implications for native biodiversity , 2022 .

[9]  Lloyd L. Coulter,et al.  Irrigated vegetation assessment for urban environments , 2003 .

[10]  Josef Strobl,et al.  What’s wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS , 2001 .

[11]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Monitoring urban land cover change: An expert system approach to land cover classification of semiarid to arid urban centers , 2001 .

[12]  G. Guyot,et al.  2 – OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF VEGETATION CANOPIES , 1990 .

[13]  R. Mathieu,et al.  Mapping private gardens in urban areas using object-oriented techniques and very high-resolution satellite imagery , 2007 .

[14]  M. Bock,et al.  Object-oriented methods for habitat mapping at multiple scales – Case studies from Northern Germany and Wye Downs, UK , 2005 .

[15]  Mary Ann Cunningham,et al.  Accuracy assessment of digitized and classified land cover data for wildlife habitat , 2006 .

[16]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[17]  R. Alexander,et al.  Vegetation Mapping: From Patch to Planet , 2000 .

[18]  C. M. Lee,et al.  Urban vegetation monitoring in Hong Kong using high resolution multispectral images , 2005 .

[19]  M. Ashton,et al.  Hyperion, IKONOS, ALI, and ETM+ sensors in the study of African rainforests , 2004 .

[20]  Per Angelstam,et al.  Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space , 2006 .

[21]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[22]  Jürgen Breuste,et al.  Decision making, planning and design for the conservation of indigenous vegetation within urban development , 2004 .

[23]  L. Wald,et al.  Fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images : The ARSIS concept and its implementation , 2000 .

[24]  P. Bolund,et al.  Ecosystem services in urban areas , 1999 .

[25]  N. Lam,et al.  Examining Lacunarity Approaches in Comparison with Fractal and Spatial Autocorrelation Techniques for Urban Mapping , 2005 .

[26]  Xiaoli Ding,et al.  Earth Observation for Urban Planning and Management: State of the Art and Recommendations for Application of Earth Observation in Urban Planning , 2007 .

[27]  Nathan J. Heinert,et al.  Extending satellite remote sensing to local scales: land and water resource monitoring using high-resolution imagery , 2003 .

[28]  Curt H. Davis,et al.  A combined fuzzy pixel-based and object-based approach for classification of high-resolution multispectral data over urban areas , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  P. Soille,et al.  Information extraction from very high resolution satellite imagery over Lukole refugee camp, Tanzania , 2003 .

[30]  Eléonore Wolff,et al.  Urban land cover multi‐level region‐based classification of VHR data by selecting relevant features , 2006 .

[31]  A. Rango,et al.  Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico , 2004 .

[32]  W. Seidling Derived Vegetation Map of Berlin , 1998 .

[33]  E. Andersson Urban Landscapes and Sustainable Cities , 2006 .

[34]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[35]  Sadhana Jain,et al.  A remote sensing approach to establish relationships among different land covers at the micro level , 2006 .

[36]  K. Rutchey,et al.  Development of an Everglades vegetation map using a SPOT image and the global positioning system , 1994 .

[37]  I. Atkinson Derivation of vegetation mapping units for an ecological survey of Tongariro National North Island, New Zealand , 1985 .

[38]  Mark Hostetler,et al.  Scale, birds, and human decisions: a potential for integrative research in urban ecosystems , 1999 .

[39]  John A. Silander,et al.  Delineating forest canopy species in the northeastern united states using multi-temporal TM imagery , 1998 .

[40]  Philippe Clergeau,et al.  Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems , 2000 .

[41]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[42]  K. Gaston,et al.  Urban domestic gardens (IX) Composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity , 2006 .

[43]  Xuezhi Feng,et al.  Detecting urban vegetation from IKONOS data using an object-oriented approach , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[44]  M. Herold,et al.  Spatial Metrics and Image Texture for Mapping Urban Land Use , 2003 .

[45]  Thierry Ranchin,et al.  Quantitatively Assessing Roads Extracted from High-Resolution Imagery , 2004 .

[46]  Charalambos Kontoes,et al.  Kernel based re-classification of Earth observation data for fine scale habitat mapping , 2005 .

[47]  Claire Freeman,et al.  Development of an ecological mapping methodology for urban areas in New Zealand , 2003 .

[48]  Jinfei Wang,et al.  A rule-based urban land use inferring method for fine-resolution multispectral imagery , 2003 .

[49]  C. Freeman Geographic information systems and the conservation of urban biodiversity , 1999 .

[50]  Jennifer N Solomon,et al.  The Pigeon Paradox: Dependence of Global Conservation on Urban Nature , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[51]  M. Hermy,et al.  Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders , 2004 .