Quantifying the Impact of Light Pollution on Sea Turtle Nesting Using Ground-Based Imagery

Remote sensing of anthropogenic light has substantial potential to quantify light pollution levels and understand its impact on a wide range of taxa. Currently, the use of space-borne night-time sensors for measuring the actual light pollution that animals experience is limited. This is because most night-time satellite imagery and space-borne sensors measure the light that is emitted or reflected upwards, rather than horizontally, which is often the light that is primarily perceived by animals. Therefore, there is an important need for developing and testing ground-based remote sensing techniques and methods. In this study, we aimed to address this gap by examining the potential of ground photography to quantify the actual light pollution perceived by animals, using sea turtles as a case study. We conducted detailed ground measurements of night-time brightness around the coast of Heron Island, a coral cay in the southern Great Barrier Reef of Australia, and an important sea turtle rookery, using a calibrated DSLR Canon camera with an 8 mm fish-eye lens. The resulting hemispheric photographs were processed using the newly developed Sky Quality Camera (SQC) software to extract brightness metrics. Furthermore, we quantified the factors determining the spatial and temporal variation in night-time brightness as a function of environmental factors (e.g., moon light, cloud cover, and land cover) and anthropogenic features (e.g., artificial light sources and built-up areas). We found that over 80% of the variation in night-time brightness was explained by the percentage of the moon illuminated, moon altitude, as well as cloud cover. Anthropogenic and geographic factors (e.g., artificial lighting and the percentage of visible sky) were especially important in explaining the remaining variation in measured brightness under moonless conditions. Night-time brightness variables, land cover, and rock presence together explained over 60% of the variation in sea turtle nest locations along the coastline of Heron Island, with more nests found in areas of lower light pollution. The methods we developed enabled us to overcome the limitations of commonly used ground/space borne remote sensing techniques, which are not well suited for measuring the light pollution to which animals are exposed. The findings of this study demonstrate the applicability of ground-based remote sensing techniques in accurately and efficiently measuring night-time brightness to enhance our understanding of ecological light pollution.

[1]  A. Whitfield,et al.  Potential effects of artificial light associated with anthropogenic infrastructure on the abundance and foraging behaviour of estuary‐associated fishes , 2013 .

[2]  J. Leon,et al.  Marine turtles are not fussy nesters: a novel test of small-scale nest site selection using structure from motion beach terrain information , 2017, PeerJ.

[3]  Deren Li,et al.  Anisotropic characteristic of artificial light at night – Systematic investigation with VIIRS DNB multi-temporal observations , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[4]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Human alteration of natural light cycles: causes and ecological consequences , 2014, Oecologia.

[5]  K. Gaston,et al.  Mapping artificial lightscapes for ecological studies , 2014 .

[6]  M. Kocifaj Light-pollution model for cloudy and cloudless night skies with ground-based light sources. , 2007, Applied optics.

[7]  M. Salmon,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLES ON AN URBAN BEACH. II: HATCHLING ORIENTATION , 1995 .

[8]  Andreas Jechow,et al.  Tracking the dynamics of skyglow with differential photometry using a digital camera with fisheye lens , 2018, 1808.10224.

[9]  J. Frazier Observations on Sea Turtles at Aldabra Atoll , 1971 .

[10]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification , 2017, Bioinform..

[11]  Noam Levin,et al.  Quantifying urban light pollution — A comparison between field measurements and EROS-B imagery , 2016 .

[12]  C. Limpus,et al.  Temporal changes in artificial light exposure of marine turtle nesting areas , 2014, Global change biology.

[13]  Javier Diéguez Uribeondo,et al.  Leatherback hatchling sea-finding in response to artificial lighting: Interaction between wavelength and moonlight , 2015 .

[14]  Juergen Fischer,et al.  Red is the new black: how the colour of urban skyglow varies with cloud cover , 2012 .

[15]  P. Rich Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. , 1990 .

[16]  F. J. Verheijen,et al.  The photic orientation of hatchling sea turtles during water finding behaviour , 1973 .

[17]  R. H. Garstang Brightness of clouds at night over a city , 2006 .

[18]  A. Jechow,et al.  Imaging and mapping the impact of clouds on skyglow with all-sky photometry , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[19]  K W Riegel,et al.  Light Pollution , 1973, Science.

[20]  C. Limpus,et al.  Artificial lighting and disrupted sea-finding behaviour in hatchling loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on the Woongarra coast, south-east Queensland, Australia , 2013, Australian Journal of Zoology.

[21]  Travis Longcore,et al.  Ecological light pollution , 2004 .

[22]  Christian Wolter,et al.  Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  Jonathan Bennie,et al.  The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  C. Limpus,et al.  The effect of on-shore light pollution on sea-turtle hatchlings commencing their off-shore swim , 2017, Wildlife Research.

[25]  Jordi Torra,et al.  How Clouds are Amplifying (or not) the Effects of ALAN , 2016 .

[26]  Stuart R. Phinn,et al.  A new source for high spatial resolution night time images — The EROS-B commercial satellite , 2014 .

[27]  Andreas Jechow,et al.  Using all-sky differential photometry to investigate how nocturnal clouds darken the night sky in rural areas , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Franz Hölker,et al.  Cloud Coverage Acts as an Amplifier for Ecological Light Pollution in Urban Ecosystems , 2011, PloS one.

[29]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Colour remote sensing of the impact of artificial light at night (I): The potential of the International Space Station and other DSLR-based platforms , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[30]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Can satellite-based night lights be used for conservation? The case of nesting sea turtles in the Mediterranean , 2013 .

[31]  C. Elvidge,et al.  Remote sensing of night lights: A review and an outlook for the future , 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[32]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[33]  Travis Longcore,et al.  High correlation but high scale-dependent variance between satellite measured night lights and terrestrial exposure , 2020, Environmental Research Communications.

[34]  Ned Horning,et al.  Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[35]  M. Salmon,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF LOGGERHEAD SEA TURTLES ON AN URBAN BEACH. I: CORRELATES OF NEST PLACEMENT , 1995 .

[36]  M. Salmon,et al.  Artificial Lighting and Seafinding by Loggerhead Hatchlings: Evidence for Lunar Modulation , 1995 .

[37]  Jesús Gallego,et al.  STARS4ALL Night Sky Brightness Photometer , 2017 .

[38]  Noam Levin,et al.  Analyzing spatial variability in night-time lights using a high spatial resolution color Jilin-1 image – Jerusalem as a case study , 2020 .

[39]  Andreas Jechow,et al.  Measuring night sky brightness: methods and challenges , 2017, 1709.09558.

[40]  Qihao Weng,et al.  A new source of multi-spectral high spatial resolution night-time light imagery—JL1-3B , 2018, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[41]  Richard Inger,et al.  Artificial light alters natural regimes of night-time sky brightness , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[42]  N. Mrosovsky,et al.  Preference for light of short wavelengths in hatchling green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas, tested on their natural nesting beaches. , 1967, Behaviour.

[43]  B. Witherington,et al.  BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES OF NESTING SEA TURTLES TO ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING , 1992 .

[44]  J. Lyytimäki Nature's nocturnal services: Light pollution as a non-recognised challenge for ecosystem services research and management , 2013 .

[45]  John C. Barentine,et al.  Methods for Assessment and Monitoring of Light Pollution around Ecologically Sensitive Sites , 2019, J. Imaging.

[46]  C. Elvidge,et al.  VIIRS night-time lights , 2017, Remote Sensing of Night-time Light.

[47]  Kevin Krisciunas,et al.  A MODEL OF THE BRIGHTNESS OF MOONLIGHT , 1991 .

[48]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The nature, extent, and ecological implications of marine light pollution , 2014 .

[49]  A. Jechow,et al.  Mapping the brightness and color of urban to rural skyglow with all-sky photometry , 2020, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer.

[50]  L. Guanter,et al.  Artificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent , 2017, Science Advances.

[51]  Andreas Jechow,et al.  Beyond All-Sky: Assessing Ecological Light Pollution Using Multi-Spectral Full-Sphere Fisheye Lens Imaging , 2019, J. Imaging.