A wrapped multi-label classifier for the automatic diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer’s disease

BACKGROUND AD is the most frequent neurodegenerative disease, severely impacting our society. Early diagnosis and prognosis are challenging tasks in the management of AD patients. NEW METHOD We implemented a machine-learning classifier for the automatic early diagnosis and prognosis of AD by means of features extracted, selected and optimized from structural MRI brain images. The classifier was designed to perform multi-label automatic classification into the following four classes: HC, ncMCI, cMCI, and AD. RESULTS From our analyses, it emerged that MMSE and hippocampus-related measures must be included as primary measures in automatic-classification systems for both the early diagnosis and the prognosis of AD. The voting scheme mainly based on the binary-classification performances on the different four groups is the best choice to model the multi-label decision function for AD, when compared with a simple majority-vote scheme or with a scheme aimed at discriminating patients with high vs low risk of conversion to AD and therapy addressing. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) The accuracies of our binary classifications were higher than or comparable to previously published methods. An improvement is needed on the approach we used to combine binary-classification outputs to obtain the final multi-label classification. CONCLUSIONS The performance of multi-label automatic-classification systems strongly depends on the choice of the voting scheme used for combining binary-classification labels.

[1]  Christian Salvatore,et al.  Optimizing Neuropsychological Assessments for Cognitive, Behavioral, and Functional Impairment Classification: A Machine Learning Study , 2017, Behavioural neurology.

[2]  A. Wimo,et al.  The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis , 2013, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[3]  J. Morris,et al.  Recent publications from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Reviewing progress toward improved AD clinical trials , 2017, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[4]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  A review on neuroimaging-based classification studies and associated feature extraction methods for Alzheimer's disease and its prodromal stages , 2017, NeuroImage.

[5]  Vladimir Fonov,et al.  Standardized evaluation of algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis of dementia based on structural MRI: The CADDementia challenge , 2015, NeuroImage.

[6]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Subhash C. Bagui,et al.  Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms , 2005, Technometrics.

[8]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  Richard G Stefanacci,et al.  The costs of Alzheimer's disease and the value of effective therapies. , 2011, The American journal of managed care.

[10]  P. Battista,et al.  Frontiers for the Early Diagnosis of AD by Means of MRI Brain Imaging and Support Vector Machines. , 2016, Current Alzheimer research.

[11]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[12]  J. Morris,et al.  The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[13]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[14]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls , 2017, NeuroImage.

[15]  Marie Chupin,et al.  Automatic classi fi cation of patients with Alzheimer ' s disease from structural MRI : A comparison of ten methods using the ADNI database , 2010 .

[16]  Pradeep Reddy Raamana,et al.  Three-Class Differential Diagnosis among Alzheimer Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, and Controls , 2014, Front. Neurol..

[17]  A. Cerasa,et al.  Machine learning on brain MRI data for differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  Juha Koikkalainen,et al.  Differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases using structural MRI data , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[19]  G. Arbanas Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) , 2015 .

[20]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Prediction as a Humanitarian and Pragmatic Contribution from Human Cognitive Neuroscience , 2015, Neuron.

[21]  Antonio Cerasa,et al.  Biomarkers of Eating Disorders Using Support Vector Machine Analysis of Structural Neuroimaging Data: Preliminary Results , 2015, Behavioural neurology.

[22]  C. Igel,et al.  Differential diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using structural MRI cortical thickness, hippocampal shape, hippocampal texture, and volumetry* , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[23]  M. Gilardi,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a machine learning approach , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[24]  H. Benali,et al.  Support vector machine-based classification of Alzheimer’s disease from whole-brain anatomical MRI , 2009, Neuroradiology.