A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs).

Sustainability reporting has been increasingly adopted by corporations worldwide given the demand of stakeholders for greater transparency on both environmental and social issues. The popularity of such reporting is evidenced by the development of a range of tools in the last two decades - Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), AA1000 and Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) inter alia. These tools, referred to collectively as corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs) are important as they serve to inform the progress of corporations towards achieving sustainability goals. However, the rapid growth of corporate SRTs, with different criteria and methodology has created major complications for stakeholders. This paper makes a genuine contribution by providing a review of some of these major tools, spanning across a wide spectrum - framework, standards, ratings and indices. A critique of SRTs is also given. Institutional investors, governments, practitioners and individuals may find this review useful in terms of understanding the nature of different corporate SRTs. As well, it can serve as a useful reference for the development of the next generation of corporate SRTs.

[1]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2003 .

[2]  Enver Doruk Özdemir,et al.  A confusion of tongues or the art of aggregating indicators—Reflections on four projective methodologies on sustainability measurement , 2011 .

[3]  Elena Escrig-Olmedo,et al.  Socially responsible investing: sustainability indices, ESG rating and information provider agencies , 2010 .

[4]  T. Opler,et al.  Does Coordinated Institutional Activism Work? An Analysis of the Activities of the Council of Institutional Investors , 1996 .

[5]  Howard Davey,et al.  The information gap in annual reports , 2002 .

[6]  J. M. Moneva,et al.  GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability , 2006 .

[7]  Raine Isaksson,et al.  What does GRI‐reporting tell us about corporate sustainability? , 2008 .

[8]  Holger R. Maier,et al.  Reliability-Based Approach to Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Water Resources , 2004 .

[9]  M. Statman,et al.  Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds , 1993 .

[10]  G. O'Donovan,et al.  Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory , 2002 .

[11]  Heinz-Peter Wallner,et al.  Towards sustainable development of industry: networking, complexity and eco-clusters , 1999 .

[12]  W. Laufer.  Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing , 2003 .

[13]  C. Searcy,et al.  An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports , 2012 .

[14]  L. Reijnders,et al.  Environmental performance evaluation and sustainability performance evaluation of organizations: an evolutionary framework , 2001 .

[15]  David L. Levy,et al.  Corporate Responses in an Emerging Climate Regime: The Institutionalization and Commensuration of Carbon Disclosure , 2008 .

[16]  Nigel Finch.  The Motivations for Adopting Sustainability Disclosure , 2005 .

[17]  A. Poelloe.  Is there a trade-off between social responsibility and financial performance? , 2010 .

[18]  A. Hillman,et al.  Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? , 2001 .

[19]  J. K. Woofter,et al.  Non-Financial Disclosure and Strategic Planning: Sustainability Reporting for Good Corporate Governance , 2005 .

[20]  S. Schaltegger,et al.  The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy , 2002 .

[21]  Saurabh Gupta,et al.  An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies , 2009 .

[22]  C. Laszlo,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Ten Principles , 2000 .

[23]  Teun W. Hardjono,et al.  European Corporate Sustainability Framework for Managing Complexity and Corporate Transformation , 2003 .

[24]  Carol A. Adams,et al.  Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising , 2002 .

[25]  Magali A. Delmas,et al.  Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade-offs of sustainability ratings , 2010 .

[26]  S. Morse,et al.  Making ‘dirty’ nations look clean? The nation state and the problem of selecting and weighting indices as tools for measuring progress towards sustainability , 2005 .

[27]  C. Deegan,et al.  An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983‐1997: A test of legitimacy theory , 2002 .

[28]  Markus J. Milne,et al.  Securing organizational legitimacy , 2002 .

[29]  Deborah Leipziger.  Social Accountability 8000 , 2017 .

[30]  F. Székely,et al.  Responsible Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility:: Metrics for Sustainable Performance , 2005 .

[31]  John P. Koeplin,et al.  Sustainability Reporting Practices In Portugal: Greenwashing Or Triple Bottom Line? , 2011 .

[32]  Fang Wan,et al.  The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications , 2012 .

[33]  Cory Searcy,et al.  Corporate sustainability reporting in the apparel industry , 2015 .

[34]  D. Huisingh,et al.  Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting , 2011 .

[35]  Ralitza Nikolaeva,et al.  The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards , 2011 .

[36]  Giuliano Noci,et al.  DEFINING ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK , 1996 .

[37]  C. Deegan,et al.  A Study of the Environmental Disclosure Practices of Australian Corporations , 1996 .

[38]  S. Waddock.  Stakeholder performance implications of corporate responsibility , 2003 .

[39]  Stefan Schaltegger,et al.  The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard as a Framework for Eco‐efficiency Analysis , 2005 .

[40]  Rob Bauer,et al.  The Ethical Mutual Fund Performance Debate: New Evidence from Canada , 2007 .

[41]  P. Bhatia,et al.  The greenhouse gas protocol : a corporate accounting and reporting standard , 2001 .

[42]  A. Rahdari,et al.  Designing a General Set of Sustainability Indicators at the Corporate Level , 2015 .

[43]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Gri Sustainability Reporting Guidelines For Public And Third Sector Organizations , 2010 .

[44]  Constantin Zopounidis.  MCDA methodologies for classification and sorting , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Sharon Beder,et al.  Manipulating public knowledge , 1998 .

[46]  S. Al-Athel,et al.  Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" , 1987 .

[47]  Berit Balfors,et al.  Framework for environmental performance measurement in a Swedish public sector organization , 2009 .

[48]  Michael P. Krzus,et al.  Market Interest in Nonfinancial Information , 2011 .

[49]  David G. Carmichael,et al.  The relationship between sustainability practices and financial performance of construction companies , 2013 .

[50]  John Robinson.  Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development , 2004 .

[51]  C. Deegan,et al.  The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory , 1998 .

[52]  M. V. Marrewijk.  Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion , 2013 .

[53]  Ivan Montiel,et al.  When Are Corporate Environmental Policies a Form of Greenwashing? , 2005 .